Admit named-recipient discovery for lifecycle reviews

Assistant: codex
Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra
Assistant-Session: 01a10780-6d41-7952-9718-dfbc1f41236f

examples/informed-decision-lifecycle-review/pin.json

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 {
   "package": "informed-decision.compact-sitting",
-  "version": "v12",
+  "package_digest": "sha256:31be5985c0c1e6b0c3a039ed7310d1e94daf523a94f6d926e6e8d759d3711873",
-  "package_digest": "sha256:c5387f7d198dc39ab5967e0c218ce05cc779693565c8875e3035e45ec002a2db"
+  "version": "v13"
 }

examples/informed-decision-lifecycle-review/policy.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 id: informed-decision.compact-sitting
 name: Compact sitting exact-record human review
 namespace: informed-decision:decision-memo
-version: v12
+version: v13
 status: ready
 package: flexauth.informed_decision.compact_sitting
 allow_ttl: 30s
@@ -129,6 +129,13 @@ route; it does not assert directory membership in tenant:platform.
 Only a real human uses accept. This package neither issues nor consumes
 approval. Native pins: `docs/evidence/2026-09-15-sitting-approval-creates.json`.
 
+v13 adds attribute-based `list` for the retained named recipient. The consumer
+supplies `review_recipient` from the immutable memo and verifies the live native
+approval requester, human-control flag and binding digest before asking the PDP.
+Listing has the existing twelve-hour MFA window; read and all acts retain 900
+seconds. Existing exact-record branches retain precedence. A list allow exposes
+only overview metadata and cannot stand in for a read or act decision.
+
 ```rego
 import rego.v1
 
@@ -265,7 +272,7 @@ exact_id if {
 
 attribute_attempt if {
   not exact_id
-  input.action in {"read", "acknowledge", "accept", "return", "discuss", "decline"}
+  input.action in {"read", "acknowledge", "accept", "return", "discuss", "decline", "list"}
   ctx := object.get(input, "context", {})
   some key in {"review_group", "memo_class", "intake_submitter", "approval_requester", "approval_human_control"}
   object.get(ctx, key, null) != null
@@ -288,17 +295,26 @@ identity_core if {
   assurance.at > 0
 }
 
+mfa_window := 43200 if input.action == "list" else := 900
+
 mfa_fresh if {
   identity_core
   age := time.now_ns() / 1000000000 - input.subject.attributes.assurance.at
   age >= -30
-  age <= 900
+  age <= mfa_window
 }
 
 stale_mfa if {
   identity_core
   age := time.now_ns() / 1000000000 - input.subject.attributes.assurance.at
-  age > 900
+  age > mfa_window
+}
+
+recipient_ok if input.action != "list"
+
+recipient_ok if {
+  input.action == "list"
+  input.context.review_recipient == input.subject.id
 }
 
 resource_ok if {
@@ -433,6 +449,7 @@ decision := {"effect": "allow", "reason": "operator_admitted_compact_sitting"} i
 } else := {"effect": "allow", "reason": "attribute_eligible"} if {
   attribute_attempt
   mfa_fresh
+  recipient_ok
   resource_ok
   review_group_ok
   class_ok
@@ -451,6 +468,9 @@ decision := {"effect": "allow", "reason": "operator_admitted_compact_sitting"} i
 } else := {"effect": "deny", "reason": "identity_refused"} if {
   attribute_attempt
   not mfa_fresh
+} else := {"effect": "deny", "reason": "recipient_refused"} if {
+  attribute_attempt
+  not recipient_ok
 } else := {"effect": "deny", "reason": "resource_refused"} if {
   attribute_attempt
   not resource_ok
@@ -671,10 +691,34 @@ test_bad_memo_id_refused if {
   eligible(object.union(attribute_input, {"resource": object.union(attribute_input.resource, {"id": "memo:NO"})})).reason == "resource_refused"
 }
 
-test_list_does_not_use_attribute_admission if {
+test_list_requires_explicit_recipient if {
   got := eligible(object.union(attribute_input, {"action": "list"}))
   got.effect == "deny"
-  got.reason == "compact_sitting_scope_or_identity_refused"
+  got.reason == "recipient_refused"
+}
+
+list_input := patched_context(object.union(attribute_input, {"action": "list"}), {"review_recipient": "test-human"})
+
+test_list_admits_recipient_with_twelve_hour_mfa if {
+  eligible(with_at(list_input, time.now_ns() / 1000000000 - 3600)).effect == "allow"
+  eligible(with_at(list_input, time.now_ns() / 1000000000 - 43201)).reason == "stale_mfa"
+}
+
+test_list_refuses_other_recipient if {
+  eligible(patched_context(list_input, {"review_recipient": "other-human"})).reason == "recipient_refused"
+}
+
+test_list_does_not_relax_read_or_accept if {
+  every action in {"read", "accept"} {
+    eligible(with_at(object.union(list_input, {"action": action}), time.now_ns() / 1000000000 - 3600)).reason == "stale_mfa"
+  }
+}
+
+test_list_retains_approval_and_group_guards if {
+  eligible(patched_context(list_input, {"approval_human_control": false})).reason == "human_control_false"
+  eligible(patched_context(list_input, {"approval_requester": "other"})).reason == "requester_mismatch"
+  eligible(patched_context(list_input, {"review_group": "other"})).reason == "review_group_not_verified"
+  eligible(patched_context(list_input, {"memo_class": "other"})).reason == "unknown_class"
 }
 
 test_exact_record_ignores_attribute_context if {

workplans/FLEX-WP-0034-informed-decision-review-discovery.md

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+---
+id: FLEX-WP-0034
+type: workplan
+title: "Named-recipient discovery for lifecycle reviews"
+domain: infotech
+repo: access-engine
+status: active
+owner: codex
+topic_slug: netkingdom
+created: "2026-10-05"
+updated: "2026-10-05"
+origin: demand
+origin_ref: INFD-WP-0007-T05
+---
+
+## Implement and verify recipient-scoped list admission
+
+```task
+id: FLEX-WP-0034-T01
+status: done
+priority: high
+```
+
+Compact-sitting v13 extends the admitted lifecycle attribute branch to list.
+It requires the carried immutable review recipient to equal the authenticated
+human subject, existing class/submitter/group admission and live native approval
+checks in the consumer. Existing exact records retain precedence. Listing uses
+the existing twelve-hour assurance window; read/acts retain fifteen minutes.
+32 embedded policy tests and owner InformedDecision regressions pass. Consumer
+integration covers list/read separation, another recipient and engine outage.
+Attribution remains unsigned; no new control claim is made.
+
+## Release through the owning Helm workflow
+
+```task
+id: FLEX-WP-0034-T02
+status: progress
+priority: high
+```
+
+Founder requested deploying the authoring increment and implementing the rest of
+INFD-WP-0007. Authority for its continuation: ADMINISTER @
+realm:kubernetes/railiance01, activation=APPROVED. Build immutable owner artifact,
+scan, dry-run/diff, then update the existing review Helm release. The consumer's
+pinned version/digest must match. Retain the previous artifact/config as rollback.
+No anonymous publication, additional workload identity or non-approval bind is
+admitted by this change.