Decision 5.3 makes n/a an admissible level, which is what T01 needed; withdraw
finding 6 and adopt tenancy.yaml rather than proposing a format. Findings
1-5 and 7 survive because section 11 is byte-identical across drafts 5-7 —
four repos reviewed and none touched the commercial section, which is ours.
Records the sellability read: with flex-auth at A0, apps-pg at R0 and
tenant-engine on SQLite, no tier can support an isolation, availability or
retention claim today. Notes that section 5.5 provider declarations mean
T02 must reference two levels, not one.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
1a578e605b