test: enforce the presentation exclusion contract for approval digests
Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a07ff8-19d0-7820-b4d0-1353833cb7fc
This commit is contained in:
parent
62233c7c52
commit
adb5cb0a9a
4 changed files with 109 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ status: active
|
|||
owner: codex
|
||||
topic_slug: netkingdom
|
||||
created: "2026-09-01"
|
||||
updated: "2026-09-06"
|
||||
updated: "2026-09-10"
|
||||
reviewed_at: "2026-09-01"
|
||||
reviewed_against_commit: "ebce5abb276c01ab29ce2526f3b8abb332dc9e90"
|
||||
reviewed_note: >-
|
||||
|
|
@ -237,6 +237,15 @@ here because this engine stores that object verbatim as the only downstream
|
|||
record that MFA happened. T01 stays `progress`; the human client cannot be
|
||||
registered until the tenant source is settled by its owner.
|
||||
|
||||
2026-09-10: GH-DEC-2026-016 supplies the previously missing NC-03 doctrine.
|
||||
Approvals explicitly declared as discharging human-in-the-loop or dual-control
|
||||
requirements must refuse non-human binds at issue. T01 owns the declaration,
|
||||
engine/API enforcement, predecessor inheritance and negative legacy migration,
|
||||
verified human identity provenance, tests and subsequent deployed proof. This
|
||||
return changes neither existing rows nor production admission. The new rule is
|
||||
not satisfied merely by the already-recorded principal_type field. The separate
|
||||
R3 digest-exclusion condition is completed in T06 below.
|
||||
|
||||
## Harden durable storage and migrations
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
|
|
@ -600,3 +609,27 @@ not the evidence of publication; the successful push and remote index lookup are
|
|||
|
||||
No StatefulSet rollout yet: live KeyCape registrations and audit sender/token
|
||||
admission remain outstanding. APPROVAL-WP-0002-T03 stays wait for those gates.
|
||||
|
||||
## Make presentation exclusion a tested binding contract
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: APPROVAL-WP-0002-T06
|
||||
status: done
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
GH-DEC-2026-015 §4 conditions informed-decision's nested binding.digest on an
|
||||
explicit normative presentation exclusion and a regression that exposes widening.
|
||||
The native digest MUST cover exactly the five act fields and MUST NOT acquire
|
||||
presentation fields. Callers keep presentation outside effect scope; arbitrary
|
||||
nested target scope is preserved, not silently filtered.
|
||||
|
||||
Completed 2026-09-10: docs/approval-claim.md states the rule. The durable issue/claim
|
||||
regression varies view_hash, brief, packet, highlights, locale, UI release and a
|
||||
presentation wrapper while proving the stored act/digest remain unchanged. It
|
||||
also varies all five act fields independently and requires the digest to change.
|
||||
A deliberate whole-binding canonicalization mutation fails the regression; the
|
||||
production algorithm is unchanged. Evidence: docs/evidence/2026-09-10-presentation-exclusion.json.
|
||||
This supplies the engine condition for INFD-IN-0004; actual informed-decision
|
||||
adoption remains its existing work. T01 retains GH-DEC-2026-016 and native identity,
|
||||
T03/T05 deployment/real consumption remain open. No live approval was issued.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue