Run the scan gate; harden the image and stop short of release
glas-harness asked for a scanned immutable image. The scan ran, and it failed on the base we had sanctioned, so no image was pushed. Every finding is inherited from the base image or its distro packages; none is in approval_engine code. Two fixes applied here: The base pin was stale. It named a Debian 13.5 build of python:3.12-slim while upstream is 13.6. Bumping the digest removes 30 HIGH and 47 MEDIUM on its own. Still a digest, not a floating tag. pip is gone from the runtime image. All 10 MEDIUM Python findings were in pip itself, a build-time tool with no business in a running approval service. The build is now two-stage, and pip is removed from both the venv and the base's /usr/local, so command -v pip returns nothing. What remains is a decision rather than a task. Three CRITICALs persist on Debian, all perl-base (CVE-2026-13221, CVE-2026-42496, CVE-2026-8376), none with an upstream fix, in a package this service never invokes and that Debian marks Essential. An Alpine variant carries no perl and scans 0 CRITICAL / 7 HIGH / 1 MEDIUM against Debian's 3 / 51 / 56. Alpine is proven viable rather than asserted: musl wheels resolve with no toolchain, the full suite passes on musl at 111 tests, and non-root uid 10001, schema v3, tenant:platform, fresh-store migrate/verify and both production fail-closed gates all hold in the built image. It is parked in Containerfile.alpine as a candidate; Containerfile remains sanctioned. Nothing was released. Pushing the Debian variant would pin three unfixable CRITICALs into a release digest, and choosing the runtime C library for this service is not a call to make silently. The manifest still carries REPLACE_WITH_RELEASE_DIGEST. Full record in docs/image-scan-2026-09-06.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PM5HnEAhokxdfcPqBNpT7D Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 715850@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: eb557e93-7cb1-45d0-9e57-7d15b3edc60e
This commit is contained in:
parent
6d18f62a90
commit
f88a92fb37
4 changed files with 214 additions and 5 deletions
103
docs/image-scan-2026-09-06.md
Normal file
103
docs/image-scan-2026-09-06.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
|
|||
# Image scan — 2026-09-06
|
||||
|
||||
Scanner: `aquasec/trivy:latest` (`--scanners vuln`), run against locally built
|
||||
images. Requested by `glas-harness` under `GLAS-WP-0015` / `APPROVAL-WP-0002-T03`.
|
||||
|
||||
**No image was pushed.** The scan is why — see "Why nothing was released".
|
||||
|
||||
## Results
|
||||
|
||||
| Image | CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| As pinned before this session (`python:3.12-slim@sha256:d764629c…`, Debian 13.5) | 3 | 81 | 103 |
|
||||
| `slim-hardened` — base bumped to `@sha256:78387bc3…` (Debian 13.6), pip removed | 3 | 51 | 56 |
|
||||
| `alpine` — `python:3.12-alpine@sha256:b64631e0…` (Alpine 3.24.1), pip removed | **0** | **7** | **1** |
|
||||
|
||||
Every finding is inherited from the base image or its distro packages. None is in
|
||||
`approval_engine` code, and after removing pip the Python dependency layer
|
||||
(`cryptography` 50.0.1, `PyJWT` 2.13.0, `waitress` 3.0.2, `cffi`, `pycparser`)
|
||||
reports zero findings at MEDIUM and above in all three.
|
||||
|
||||
## Two fixes applied
|
||||
|
||||
**The base pin was stale.** `Containerfile` pinned a Debian 13.5 build of
|
||||
`python:3.12-slim`; current upstream is Debian 13.6. Bumping the pin removes 30
|
||||
HIGH and 47 MEDIUM findings on its own. The pin is still a digest, not a tag —
|
||||
the fix is a newer immutable pin, not a floating one.
|
||||
|
||||
**pip is gone from the runtime image.** All 10 MEDIUM Python findings were in
|
||||
pip itself, which is a build-time tool with no business in a running approval
|
||||
service. The build is now two-stage: pip installs the venv in the build stage
|
||||
and is deleted from both the venv and the base's `/usr/local` in the runtime
|
||||
stage. `command -v pip pip3 pip3.12` returns nothing in both variants.
|
||||
|
||||
## The three CRITICALs, and why the base choice is now open
|
||||
|
||||
The remaining CRITICALs on Debian are all `perl-base` 5.40.1-6:
|
||||
|
||||
- `CVE-2026-13221`
|
||||
- `CVE-2026-42496`
|
||||
- `CVE-2026-8376`
|
||||
|
||||
**All three have no upstream fix** (trivy reports no fixed version), so no base
|
||||
bump or package upgrade clears them. `perl-base` is `Essential: yes` on Debian
|
||||
and is not safely removable. This service does not use perl at any point.
|
||||
|
||||
Alpine carries no perl at all, which is why it reports 0 CRITICAL. That makes
|
||||
the base a real decision rather than a preference:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Alpine** clears all three CRITICALs and drops HIGH from 51 to 7, but changes
|
||||
the C library from glibc to musl.
|
||||
- **Debian slim** keeps glibc and ships three unfixable CRITICALs in a package
|
||||
the service never calls.
|
||||
|
||||
### Evidence that Alpine is viable
|
||||
|
||||
- Image builds with no compiler toolchain: `cryptography` 50.0.1 installs from
|
||||
musllinux wheels.
|
||||
- **The full test suite passes on musl: 111 passed**, the same count as the
|
||||
workstation. (An earlier run showed 102 passed / 1 skipped; the 9-test gap was
|
||||
`tests/test_examples.py` skipping on a missing `jsonschema` test dependency in
|
||||
the throwaway container, not a musl failure.)
|
||||
- Runtime identity `uid=10001(approval) gid=10001(approval)`, non-root.
|
||||
- Carries `LATEST_SCHEMA_VERSION = 3` and `Engine` tenant default
|
||||
`tenant:platform`.
|
||||
- First-install migration on a fresh volume: `migrate` then `verify` both report
|
||||
`schema_version: 3`, `schema_current: true`, `integrity: ["ok"]`,
|
||||
`foreign_key_violations: 0`, `persistent: true`.
|
||||
- Fail-closed gates hold in the image: `serve --production --db :memory:`
|
||||
refuses with "production requires a persistent database"; production without
|
||||
audit configuration refuses with "production requires authenticated audit
|
||||
delivery".
|
||||
|
||||
`Containerfile.alpine` holds this variant. It is a **candidate**, not the
|
||||
sanctioned base — the sanctioned base is still `Containerfile`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Why nothing was released
|
||||
|
||||
`glas-harness` asked for a scanned immutable image and said to deploy only when
|
||||
identity and audit requirements pass. The scan gate is not met by the Debian
|
||||
variant, and pushing it would bake three unfixable CRITICALs into a release
|
||||
digest that the manifest then pins by hash.
|
||||
|
||||
Choosing the runtime C library for a production approval service is also not a
|
||||
call this repo should make silently. So:
|
||||
|
||||
- No push to `forgejo.coulomb.social`.
|
||||
- `deploy/approval-engine.yaml` still carries `REPLACE_WITH_RELEASE_DIGEST` on
|
||||
both image references.
|
||||
- `APPROVAL-WP-0002-T03` stays `wait`.
|
||||
|
||||
Local build digests, recorded for traceability and explicitly **not** release
|
||||
digests: `slim-hardened` `sha256:78b87e68e520…`, `alpine` `sha256:736647294706…`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Open questions for owners
|
||||
|
||||
1. Is Alpine/musl acceptable as the sanctioned base for this service? If yes,
|
||||
`Containerfile.alpine` becomes `Containerfile` and the release is scanned
|
||||
clean of CRITICALs.
|
||||
2. If glibc is required, is a documented exception for the three unfixable
|
||||
`perl-base` CVEs acceptable, given the service never invokes perl? A
|
||||
distroless glibc base is the third option and was not evaluated here.
|
||||
3. Which scanner is sanctioned for the gate? This used trivy because it needed
|
||||
no install; the estate may have a different standard.
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue