tegwick
564534dbcb
Gate House confirmed all three requested dispositions as GH-DEC-2026-005 (GH-IN-0002, closed); flex-auth accepted as FLEX-DEC-2026-006. The approval-claim is the step-1 artifact, ActionAuthorization is not required and MUST NOT be served from the claim endpoint, and a PEP validates across the claim and the step-2 DecisionEnvelope. Gate House recorded the split as doctrine rather than convenience -- a PIP must not republish the PDP's decision -- and struck the provenance.authority == state-hub requirement explicitly. This engine's claim schema is unchanged. Correct the deferred option D trigger list. The G3 trigger was written conditional on G3 being settled by composition; flex-auth reports FLEX-WP-0019 closed it by adding a lifetime field to DecisionEnvelope on 2026-09-02, so a decision now states its own end without borrowing ActionAuthorizationValidity. That was the one structural thing the bundle did that the split does not, so the trigger is not merely spent -- it resolved against ratification. Struck with reasons; a future revisit needs a fresh argument. The trigger came from a stale row in a dated 2026-08-29 review record that flex-auth does not rewrite. Also record the root cause of the bad authority constant: it came from a flex-auth fixture, not prose. A contract whose examples contradict its prose will be implemented as its examples. Close APPROVAL-IN-0002. Docs only; 84 tests pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TvyJPAaVCGsVheVhcCwNND Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 411227@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: d566f6d3-bcaf-43c3-bc5e-3ddd0f64b535 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| approval-claim.md | ||
| approval-consumption.md | ||
| caller-authentication.md | ||
| emission-cadence.md | ||
| flex-auth-handoff.md | ||
| gate-house-decision-request-claim-envelope.md | ||
| keycape-service-registrations.md | ||
| outbox-contract.md | ||
| pep-integration.md | ||
| storage-operations.md | ||