ASSEMBLY-WP-0006-T06: scope sectors and goods; add ASSEMBLY-WP-0007

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 1494246@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: caf6de6f-f9e4-47ce-a584-49baa271fa4b
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-10-12 08:41:25 +02:00
parent ee7b17da5e
commit 6462040a15
6 changed files with 162 additions and 6 deletions

View file

@ -2,16 +2,15 @@
# Custodian Brief — assembly-economics
**Domain:** communication
**Last synced:** 2026-10-12 06:24 UTC
**Last synced:** 2026-10-12 06:27 UTC
**State Hub:** http://127.0.0.1:8000 *(adjust if running on a remote machine)*
## Active Workstreams
### GADM-0.4: durable capability, cohort agency, estimated parameters
Progress: 1/6 done | workplan_id: `0016caec-fec5-5943-b565-a2c3d66b750f`
Progress: 2/6 done | workplan_id: `0016caec-fec5-5943-b565-a2c3d66b750f`
**Open tasks:**
- · Ground key parameters `d4603db8`
- · Global sensitivity on GADM-0.3 `c33dd30b`
- · Equilibrium initialisation `16c2bb94`
- · Agency per cohort `788c4143`

View file

@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
| task | ASSEMBLY-WP-0005-T05 | done | — | workplans/ASSEMBLY-WP-0005-gadm-0.3.md |
| task | ASSEMBLY-WP-0005-T06 | done | — | workplans/ASSEMBLY-WP-0005-gadm-0.3.md |
| task | ASSEMBLY-WP-0006-T01 | done | — | workplans/ASSEMBLY-WP-0006-gadm-0.4.md |
| task | ASSEMBLY-WP-0006-T02 | todo | — | workplans/ASSEMBLY-WP-0006-gadm-0.4.md |
| task | ASSEMBLY-WP-0006-T02 | done | — | workplans/ASSEMBLY-WP-0006-gadm-0.4.md |
| task | ASSEMBLY-WP-0006-T03 | todo | — | workplans/ASSEMBLY-WP-0006-gadm-0.4.md |
| task | ASSEMBLY-WP-0006-T04 | todo | — | workplans/ASSEMBLY-WP-0006-gadm-0.4.md |
| task | ASSEMBLY-WP-0006-T05 | todo | — | workplans/ASSEMBLY-WP-0006-gadm-0.4.md |

View file

@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
<!--
Created 2026-10-12 under ASSEMBLY-WP-0006-T06: scoping of the GADM-0.1 § 26
"GADM-0.4" items (sectors, rival vs. non-rival goods, ecological resource
classes, institutional selection mechanisms). Implementation is planned in
ASSEMBLY-WP-0007.
-->
# GADM Sectors and Goods — Scoping Note v0.1
**Status:** scoping only. Nothing here is implemented.
GADM up to 0.4 has a single production sector, one undifferentiated output Y*,
one ecological headroom stock E, and selection quality σ as a fixed-weight
mix of channels. GADM-0.1 § 26 plans four extensions. This note fixes their
scope and order, and names the questions each is meant to answer, so they do
not become structure for its own sake.
---
## 1. Rival versus non-rival goods (first)
**Question.** The program's core hypothesis rests on reuse of non-rival
assemblies (commons X), while ecological limits bind rival, physical output.
GADM currently mixes both in Y*. How much of the generative effect comes from
the non-rival share?
**Minimal structure.**
- Split output into a rival part Y_r (physical throughput, draws on E) and a
non-rival part Y_n (information, knowledge, software, organism services:
near-zero marginal cost, feeds X).
- Information organisms K_Ω produce mainly Y_n. K_phys produces mainly Y_r.
- Demand and claims B apply to both. Only Y_r enters the ecological draw.
**Tests.** Throughput decoupling (GADM-0.1 § 14): can VFAC rise while physical
throughput falls? Does the generative regime's ecological cost (the lowest E
in GADM-0.2) shrink when its growth is mostly non-rival?
## 2. Ecological resource classes (second)
**Question.** Is the single E stock hiding trade-offs between renewable
flows, non-renewable stocks and sinks?
**Minimal structure.** Three classes: renewable flows (regenerate), depletable
stocks (no regeneration, recycling slows depletion) and sinks (pollution
absorption capacity). Each has its own floor, following the planetary-boundaries
logic: no aggregation across classes.
**Tests.** Which class binds first in each scenario? Does compute-intensive
organism growth (`e2`) bind energy and sinks rather than materials?
## 3. Multiple sectors (third, only if 1–2 need it)
**Question.** Are there results that depend on sector composition, such as
care versus production, or infrastructure versus consumer goods?
**Minimal structure.** At most four sectors: production (rival), information
and organism services (non-rival), care (labour- and attention-intensive,
links to cohort care need), infrastructure (feeds X and the infrastructure
channel). Shares of K and of labour by sector.
**Scope guard.** Only add sectors if a concrete question from §§ 1–2 or from
the cohort model needs them. A full input–output model is out of scope.
## 4. Institutional selection mechanisms (fourth)
**Question.** σ weights market, science, community, public and organism
selection with fixed weights. Do outcomes depend on *who sets* those weights,
and can institutions shift them over time?
**Minimal structure.** Make the selection weights a slow state variable,
pushed by domination channels (for example, discovery control raises the
organism/market weight) and by governance levers (public investment raises
the public weight).
**Tests.** Does domination capture selection itself (a meta-governance
failure, WS-11)? Does a plural selection mix make the generative regime more
stable?
---
## Order and dependencies
1. Rival vs. non-rival goods, because it tests the core hypothesis.
2. Ecological classes, because it builds on the Y_r / Y_n split.
3. Sectors, only if needed.
4. Endogenous selection weights, which is independent and can go in parallel
with 2.
Every extension follows the practices established so far: a separate module
so earlier versions stay reproducible; calibration to the previous baseline;
a robustness check of the key readings; an entry in `ParameterGrounding.md`.

View file

@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ exploratory: they generate hypotheses and are not established results.
| [GADM-0.2.md](GADM-0.2.md) | GADM-0.2 | extensions decision, equations, scenario and sensitivity findings (ASSEMBLY-WP-0004) |
| [GADM-0.3.md](GADM-0.3.md) | GADM-0.3 | power channels (P1/P2) wealth separated from power (P3), attention recalibration, organism grid, life-cycle cohorts (ASSEMBLY-WP-0005) |
| [GADM-0.4.md](GADM-0.4.md) | in development | durable human capability, grounded organism depreciation (ASSEMBLY-WP-0006) |
| [GADM-Sectors-Scope.md](GADM-Sectors-Scope.md) | scoping | rival/non-rival goods, ecological classes, sectors, selection mechanisms (ASSEMBLY-WP-0006-T06 → ASSEMBLY-WP-0007) |
| [ParameterGrounding.md](ParameterGrounding.md) | v0.1 | which parameters are grounded, bracketed, assumed or calibrated |
| [GADM-0.3-Candidates.md](GADM-0.3-Candidates.md) | outline | life-cycle and power extensions, deferred items (ASSEMBLY-WP-0004-T08) |

View file

@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ literature- or data-based ranges. Re-run the affected readings.
```task
id: ASSEMBLY-WP-0006-T03
status: todo
status: progress
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "c33dd30b-a015-55d6-ba75-61dc3d7a1b49"
```
@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ by age).
```task
id: ASSEMBLY-WP-0006-T06
status: todo
status: done
priority: low
state_hub_task_id: "a0a25ecb-0958-5aea-a919-ecd218f646f9"
```

View file

@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
---
id: ASSEMBLY-WP-0007
type: workplan
title: "GADM: rival/non-rival goods, ecological classes, selection mechanisms"
domain: communication
repo: assembly-economics
status: proposed
flavor: implementation
depends_on: [ASSEMBLY-WP-0006]
owner: claude-code
topic_slug: coulomb-social
created: "2026-10-12"
updated: "2026-10-12"
---
# GADM: rival/non-rival goods, ecological classes, selection mechanisms
Implements the scope fixed in `models/GADM-Sectors-Scope.md`
(ASSEMBLY-WP-0006-T06). Not to be started until it is promoted to `ready`.
## Rival and non-rival output
```task
id: ASSEMBLY-WP-0007-T01
status: todo
priority: high
```
Split Y* into rival Y_r (draws on E) and non-rival Y_n (feeds X). Test
throughput decoupling and the generative regime's ecological cost (scoping
note § 1).
## Ecological resource classes
```task
id: ASSEMBLY-WP-0007-T02
status: todo
priority: medium
```
Replace E with renewable flows, depletable stocks and sinks, each with its own
floor. Find which class binds first per scenario (scoping note § 2).
## Endogenous selection weights
```task
id: ASSEMBLY-WP-0007-T03
status: todo
priority: medium
```
Make the selection-channel weights a slow state pushed by domination channels
and governance levers. Test capture of selection (scoping note § 4).
## Sectors, if needed
```task
id: ASSEMBLY-WP-0007-T04
status: wait
priority: low
```
Only if T01–T03 raise a question that needs sector composition (scoping
note § 3).