Answer flex-auth B3: the emitter is the section 4 source, not the archive
AUDIT-IN-0005. flex-auth produces the decision record, declares no §11 emission guarantee, and declined to take the reading that moves the obligation to audit-core. audit-core declines it too, on its own authority: class, cadence and detection surface are properties of emitting; audit-core cannot detect non-production; the obligations already sit on each sender registration; archive-as-source would make §11's check vacuous; and no access-engine sender is registered at all. Binds audit-core, does not rule §11 — gate-house still owns that, so flex-auth's G2 stays open. Reflexive half: audit-core's own chain-head attestation emission is now declared in layer.yaml rather than only in docs/integrity.md prose, and asserted against the CronJob and the contract by test. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 63291@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 8bd77868-ca68-4f49-bb1e-d539ecc0d703
This commit is contained in:
parent
5dc70afe64
commit
40fc7d694c
5 changed files with 338 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ flavor: implementation
|
|||
owner: claude
|
||||
topic_slug: railiance
|
||||
created: "2026-08-29"
|
||||
updated: "2026-09-15"
|
||||
updated: "2026-09-21"
|
||||
depends_on:
|
||||
- AUDIT-WP-0007
|
||||
state_hub_workstream_id: "46a96b03-bc08-53b5-9c93-4071adabf734"
|
||||
|
|
@ -672,3 +672,38 @@ Service/domain-transaction/human and factory runtime/spend admission remain
|
|||
separate; factory attempts and paid model calls remain zero.
|
||||
|
||||
Receipt: [native readback](../docs/evidence/2026-09-11-factory-native-readback.json).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Answer flex-auth's B3: which repository is the §4 source of evidence
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: AUDIT-WP-0009-T13
|
||||
status: done
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
`AUDIT-IN-0005`. flex-auth (access-engine) produces the decision record,
|
||||
declares no §11 emission guarantee, and raised B3 / G2 rather than take the
|
||||
reading that puts the obligation on audit-core. Answered 2026-09-21:
|
||||
**audit-core is not the source; the emitter is.** Class, cadence and detection
|
||||
surface are properties of emitting, audit-core cannot detect non-production
|
||||
(`AUDIT-IN-0003`, `GH-DEC-2026-014` limit 3), the obligations already sit on
|
||||
each sender registration, archive-as-source would make §11's check vacuous, and
|
||||
no `access-engine` sender is registered — the record never reaches this custody.
|
||||
|
||||
Ruling: `docs/section-4-source-of-evidence.md`. It binds audit-core and does not
|
||||
rule §11; gate-house still owns that, so **G2 stays open** on flex-auth's list.
|
||||
|
||||
Reflexive half, taken rather than avoided: audit-core's own chain-head
|
||||
attestation had its class, cadence and detection surface stated only in
|
||||
`docs/integrity.md` prose. Now declared in `layer.yaml` under
|
||||
`emission_guarantee` — load-bearing, rare, rate monitoring forbidden, daily
|
||||
`17 3 * * *`, 168h freshness window degrading `tamper_evidence` to `False` with
|
||||
the reason recorded — and asserted against the CronJob and the contract by
|
||||
`tests/test_layer_conformance.py`, so the declaration cannot drift from what is
|
||||
deployed.
|
||||
|
||||
Not done here: the INTENT.md `Engine` versus layer.yaml `engine` split
|
||||
(flex-auth's corrected B1). Precedence and case-sensitivity are gate-house's to
|
||||
rule, and aligning on a guess would be authoring a declaration §11 says only
|
||||
this repository may author.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue