coulomb/audit-core
5
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

AUDIT-WP-0016: wave-2 resource right-sizing receiving workplan

Browse source 
Receiving workplan for the 2026-10-21 node allocation review
(RESOURCE-WP-0008-T03 / CUST-WP-0071-T03). Wave-2 apply is human-gated;
no manifest changes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 8340@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 2e192b3d-b3e8-4403-94d4-d55a2c8b476c
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-10-21 08:47:32 +02:00
parent 64509d2c40
commit a57783aa96
1 changed files with 54 additions and 0 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

54
workplans/AUDIT-WP-0016-wave2-resource-right-sizing.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
---
id: AUDIT-WP-0016
type: workplan
title: "Wave-2 resource right-sizing from the 2026-10-21 allocation review"
domain: infotech
repo: audit-core
status: ready
flavor: implementation
owner: claude
topic_slug: audit-evidence-dependencies
created: "2026-10-21"
updated: "2026-10-21"
related:
- CUST-WP-0071
- RESOURCE-WP-0008
---
# AUDIT-WP-0016 — Wave-2 resource right-sizing from the 2026-10-21 allocation review
Receiving workplan in `audit-core` for the wave-2 request changes below.
Origin: the 2026-10-21 node allocation review (`RESOURCE-WP-0008-T03`, feeding `CUST-WP-0071-T03`). Per the founder's 2026-10-21 delivery interview (`the-custodian/docs/decisions/2026-10-21-cust-wp-0071-delivery-interview.md`) the small adjustments form wave 2: one receiving task per owner repo, applied later in a batch. Applying wave 2 needs a separate founder approval, so every cluster-write task here is a human-gated `wait`. This file changes no manifest.
## Apply the reviewed request changes
```task
id: AUDIT-WP-0016-T01
status: wait
priority: medium
needs_human: true
blocking_reason: "Wave-2 cluster write; founder approval for wave 2 not yet given (2026-10-21 interview)"
```
Values are pod-aggregate figures from the budget file (7-day window ending 2026-10-21T06:08Z). Limits stay unchanged unless stated.
| Workload (ns/name) | Pods | CPU request | CPU limit | CPU p95/peak 7d (m) | Memory request | Memory limit | Mem p95/peak (Mi) | Throttle | Action |
|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|---|
| `audit-core/audit-core` | 1 | 50m → **10m** | 500m | 1.5/12.2 | 64Mi → **64Mi** | 256Mi | 26.4/26.6 | 0.001 | decrease |
Source and container detail:
- `audit-core/audit-core`: Deployment `audit-core`, container `audit-core`, `deploy/audit-core.yaml` (50m/64Mi, limits 500m/256Mi).
Evidence: resource-control `docs/evidence/2026-10-21-node-allocation-review/2026-10-21-node-budget.md` (+ `.json`, commit `3d9b1bd`). Rule: CPU = max(floor, p95x1.5, peakx0.5) rounded up to 5m; memory request = 7d p95 working set x1.15 (only when the change is at least 64Mi).
Steps:
1. Map the pod-aggregate proposal onto the named container(s) in the source file; where a workload has several containers or pods, split by the per-pod figures in `2026-10-21-workload-usage.json` and keep the sum at the proposed value.
2. Prepare the source change as a reviewed commit (no push, no sync) and record the before values here.
3. Apply only inside the batched wave-2 rollout, after founder approval, through the owner's normal deploy path (ArgoCD sync or documented helm/kubectl apply).
Verification: `kubectl -n <ns> get pod -o jsonpath='{..resources}'` shows the new requests; pods Ready with no new restarts or OOMKilled over 24h; for CPU decreases the throttle ratio and request latency stay at or below the 7d baseline; node request total drops by the expected delta.
Rollback: revert the source commit and re-sync/re-apply; the before values in the table above are the rollback target. Keep before/after `kubectl get -o yaml` captures as the receipt.