tegwick c7a0ce9557 Review security layer model v0.4 — assent, three findings ... gate-house incorporated all of audit-core's AUDIT-IN-0001 corrections and generalized the omission bound into §9.6 as estate-wide doctrine. Findings: (1) §9.4's emission MUST is safe only if the outbox is local; "or equivalent" admits a synchronous emit to audit-core inside the state transaction, which would make an audit outage an inability to revoke — recommend one sentence requiring the queue live in approval-engine's own store. (2) §11's new who-must-declare rule is not mechanically checkable despite §11 claiming it is; recommend a canonical frontmatter form. (3) §14 says "seven of fifteen" and "remaining eight" but enumerates nine; the catalog has 16 estate-authored rows. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WpeL68AWHqtqPQZEXY5kFe Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 4040362@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 4fd0fd24-2ee8-4413-bd67-43bd79ca73f1		2026-08-28 23:06:27 +02:00
..
2026-08-28-approval-evidence-assent.md	Assent to AUDIT-IN-0001 — approval evidence half, with conditions	2026-08-28 22:46:13 +02:00
2026-08-28-security-layer-model-v0.4-review.md	Review security layer model v0.4 — assent, three findings	2026-08-28 23:06:27 +02:00