informed-decision is the browser-facing approver surface; GH-DEC-2026-012 limit 3 makes its evidence copy the one that must reach audit-core independently of the emitter, because there the actor being audited and the evidence source are the same component. Registration accepted on every proposed field — exact source, ["tenant:platform"], write true, read false, load-bearing, secret_policy redact. Prepared and inert: the scope overlay applies only to a sender the Secret already carries, asserted by test rather than by reading. Ingress ANDs namespace and pod label in one peer, following approval-engine rather than user-engine's older breadth. Gate House asked whether the record shape can carry a source-held-content declaration with a retrieval expectation, and asked for a straight answer rather than a rule the storage cannot meet. Both halves, which must travel together: It CAN carry the declaration. data is stored verbatim into details.data and hash-chained, so content_exists and custody need no schema change and become as tamper-evident as the commitment they accompany. It CANNOT detect non-production. audit-core performs no retrieval and its egress permits Postgres and DNS only. Detection happens at retrieval, by the reviewer; the stored declaration is what turns a blank into a failure attributable to the named custodian. Residual stated rather than left to be found: a custodian that never held the content can emit a false content_exists. audit-core validates the declaration's shape, never its truth — the same class as omission at source, and not closed by the chain, by attestation, or by T04/T06. A test asserts no egress to the emitter exists, because that claim silently stops being true if one appears. Cadence: reconciliation plus heartbeat is right for a mixed-volume source, with both scoped per class rather than per source — a per-source heartbeat is satisfied by the high-volume presentation stream and says nothing about a quiet month of dispositions. Bound: a compromised emitter suppresses the event and its own count together. Also recorded: commitment-only satisfies non-alteration and never reconstructability, in this repo's documents as in theirs; and tenant provenance under GH-DEC-2026-013 lands in the registration record, not the envelope, since audit-core checks a value the credential may write rather than resolving an identity claim. No secret was created and no production manifest applied. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Nb7Q6ZmXppNDkTWytfYqfv Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 2069992@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 167dd7f8-2a25-4be1-aa46-3b6f1a5f94c6
171 lines
5.4 KiB
YAML
171 lines
5.4 KiB
YAML
# Default-deny plus the narrowest set of exceptions (AUDIT-WP-0005-T03).
|
|
#
|
|
# The receiver holds the audit trail, so reachability is part of its threat
|
|
# model: only the declared sender may write, and only the declared operator
|
|
# path may read.
|
|
---
|
|
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
|
|
kind: NetworkPolicy
|
|
metadata:
|
|
name: audit-core-default-deny
|
|
namespace: audit-core
|
|
spec:
|
|
podSelector: {}
|
|
policyTypes: [Ingress, Egress]
|
|
# No rules: everything not permitted below is denied.
|
|
---
|
|
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
|
|
kind: NetworkPolicy
|
|
metadata:
|
|
name: audit-core-sender-ingress
|
|
namespace: audit-core
|
|
spec:
|
|
podSelector:
|
|
matchLabels:
|
|
app.kubernetes.io/name: audit-core
|
|
policyTypes: [Ingress]
|
|
ingress:
|
|
# user-engine is the only sender. A second sender is a deliberate change
|
|
# here and a matching entry in AUDIT_CORE_SENDERS — the network rule and
|
|
# the credential binding must move together.
|
|
- from:
|
|
- namespaceSelector:
|
|
matchLabels:
|
|
kubernetes.io/metadata.name: user-engine
|
|
ports:
|
|
- {protocol: TCP, port: 8080}
|
|
---
|
|
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
|
|
kind: NetworkPolicy
|
|
metadata:
|
|
name: audit-core-whitehat-ingress
|
|
namespace: audit-core
|
|
spec:
|
|
podSelector:
|
|
matchLabels:
|
|
app.kubernetes.io/name: audit-core
|
|
policyTypes: [Ingress]
|
|
ingress:
|
|
# Governed E2 evidence plane. Both selectors belong to one peer and are
|
|
# therefore ANDed: only the registered audit-core probe in the dedicated
|
|
# whitehat namespace reaches this port. Application sender authentication
|
|
# and tenant scope remain the inner boundary.
|
|
- from:
|
|
- namespaceSelector:
|
|
matchLabels:
|
|
kubernetes.io/metadata.name: whitehat
|
|
podSelector:
|
|
matchLabels:
|
|
whitehat.security/plane: "true"
|
|
whitehat.security/target: audit-core
|
|
ports:
|
|
- {protocol: TCP, port: 8080}
|
|
---
|
|
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
|
|
kind: NetworkPolicy
|
|
metadata:
|
|
name: audit-core-approval-engine-ingress
|
|
namespace: audit-core
|
|
spec:
|
|
podSelector:
|
|
matchLabels:
|
|
app.kubernetes.io/name: audit-core
|
|
policyTypes: [Ingress]
|
|
ingress:
|
|
# AUDIT-WP-0009-T09 / AUDIT-IN-0001. Load-bearing approval evidence
|
|
# (§9.4). Both selectors belong to one peer and are therefore ANDed:
|
|
# only the approval-engine workload in its own namespace reaches this
|
|
# port. Splitting them into two list items would turn AND into OR and
|
|
# admit every pod in either set.
|
|
#
|
|
# Narrower than user-engine's namespace-only rule on purpose: this is a
|
|
# new sender, and a new rule should not inherit an older rule's breadth.
|
|
# user-engine's policy is deliberately left unchanged.
|
|
- from:
|
|
- namespaceSelector:
|
|
matchLabels:
|
|
kubernetes.io/metadata.name: approval-engine
|
|
podSelector:
|
|
matchLabels:
|
|
app.kubernetes.io/name: approval-engine
|
|
ports:
|
|
- {protocol: TCP, port: 8080}
|
|
---
|
|
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
|
|
kind: NetworkPolicy
|
|
metadata:
|
|
name: audit-core-informed-decision-ingress
|
|
namespace: audit-core
|
|
spec:
|
|
podSelector:
|
|
matchLabels:
|
|
app.kubernetes.io/name: audit-core
|
|
policyTypes: [Ingress]
|
|
ingress:
|
|
# AUDIT-WP-0009-T11 / AUDIT-IN-0003. Load-bearing presentation evidence
|
|
# under GH-DEC-2026-012 limit 3 and GH-DEC-2026-014. Both selectors belong
|
|
# to one peer and are therefore ANDed, following the approval-engine rule
|
|
# rather than user-engine's older namespace-only breadth.
|
|
#
|
|
# Note what this rule does NOT create: no egress from audit-core to
|
|
# informed-decision. The commitment-only record's custody declaration is
|
|
# carried, never dereferenced from here — audit-core makes no retrieval
|
|
# call, and the egress policy below is the proof.
|
|
- from:
|
|
- namespaceSelector:
|
|
matchLabels:
|
|
kubernetes.io/metadata.name: informed-decision
|
|
podSelector:
|
|
matchLabels:
|
|
app.kubernetes.io/name: informed-decision
|
|
ports:
|
|
- {protocol: TCP, port: 8080}
|
|
---
|
|
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
|
|
kind: NetworkPolicy
|
|
metadata:
|
|
name: audit-core-operator-ingress
|
|
namespace: audit-core
|
|
spec:
|
|
podSelector:
|
|
matchLabels:
|
|
app.kubernetes.io/name: audit-core
|
|
policyTypes: [Ingress]
|
|
ingress:
|
|
# Operator read path: lookup, dead letters, secret findings, stats.
|
|
# Namespace-scoped rather than open, and still gated on a credential
|
|
# carrying may_read — the network rule is the outer of two checks, not the
|
|
# only one.
|
|
- from:
|
|
- namespaceSelector:
|
|
matchLabels:
|
|
railiance.io/audit-core-reader: "true"
|
|
ports:
|
|
- {protocol: TCP, port: 8080}
|
|
---
|
|
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
|
|
kind: NetworkPolicy
|
|
metadata:
|
|
name: audit-core-egress
|
|
namespace: audit-core
|
|
spec:
|
|
podSelector:
|
|
matchLabels:
|
|
app.kubernetes.io/name: audit-core
|
|
policyTypes: [Egress]
|
|
egress:
|
|
# PostgreSQL custody store. This is the only destination the receiver needs;
|
|
# it calls no other service.
|
|
- to:
|
|
- namespaceSelector:
|
|
matchLabels:
|
|
kubernetes.io/metadata.name: databases
|
|
ports:
|
|
- {protocol: TCP, port: 5432}
|
|
- to:
|
|
- namespaceSelector:
|
|
matchLabels:
|
|
kubernetes.io/metadata.name: kube-system
|
|
ports:
|
|
- {protocol: UDP, port: 53}
|
|
- {protocol: TCP, port: 53}
|