Add repo classification and record workplan review context
- .repo-classification.yaml: experimental / agents (secondary infotech), validated against canon repo-classification.allowed.yaml v1.1. Clears consistency checks C-24 and C-35. - CANP-WP-0002: status proposed (not ready) with reviewed_at/reviewed_by and context_paths. The promoted open questions carry stated leanings that want your sign-off before the workplan claims DoR-Ok; clears C-34. - WORK-RECORDS.md and workplan state_hub ids as written by fix-consistency. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bjefh8NUiEiahN4JLwoSKM Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 388925@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 3507023f-e0fd-4a1e-9d90-a0d4217d1502
This commit is contained in:
parent
1963e4b335
commit
7d278e28b7
4 changed files with 62 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ owner: codex
|
|||
topic_slug: practice
|
||||
created: "2026-09-06"
|
||||
updated: "2026-09-06"
|
||||
state_hub_workstream_id: "721dffbd-d0dd-531e-ae08-253da6d08562"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Bootstrap State Hub integration
|
||||
|
|
@ -21,6 +22,7 @@ Portable package format, spec and reference CLI for reusable prompt artifacts (C
|
|||
id: CANP-WP-0001-T01
|
||||
status: done
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "5ae59afa-917b-5d56-8393-d8cc60b41066"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Review `INTENT.md`, `SCOPE.md`, `AGENTS.md`, and `.custodian-brief.md`.
|
||||
|
|
@ -32,6 +34,7 @@ Replace generated placeholders with repo-specific facts where needed.
|
|||
id: CANP-WP-0001-T02
|
||||
status: done
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "5d3ed4f5-7d72-5058-ae71-606ee69ee32a"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Identify the repo's install, test, lint, build, and run commands. Add or refine
|
||||
|
|
@ -44,6 +47,7 @@ changes confidently.
|
|||
id: CANP-WP-0001-T03
|
||||
status: done
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "6342c0c9-d15e-5675-bf35-1b7c9f6850ff"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Done: `workplans/CANP-WP-0002-format-open-questions.md`.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -4,11 +4,19 @@ type: workplan
|
|||
title: "Resolve CPF v0.1 open questions promoted for v0.2"
|
||||
domain: agents
|
||||
repo: canned-prompts
|
||||
status: ready
|
||||
status: proposed
|
||||
owner: codex
|
||||
topic_slug: practice
|
||||
created: "2026-09-06"
|
||||
updated: "2026-09-06"
|
||||
reviewed_at: "2026-09-06"
|
||||
reviewed_by: "claude"
|
||||
context_paths:
|
||||
- "INTENT.md"
|
||||
- "CannedPromptFormat-v0.1.md"
|
||||
- "reference/canned_prompts.py"
|
||||
- "examples/pqrst-estimate/"
|
||||
state_hub_workstream_id: "c87c8e27-8b11-5306-b687-86779ef3f1be"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Resolve CPF v0.1 open questions promoted for v0.2
|
||||
|
|
@ -34,6 +42,7 @@ or execution engine that satisfies it.
|
|||
id: CANP-WP-0002-T01
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "e49bf036-0aee-5bb2-abbd-3d3f683df298"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Gap found in review.** Rendering rule § 5.1(4) makes any unresolved
|
||||
|
|
@ -76,6 +85,7 @@ Work:
|
|||
id: CANP-WP-0002-T02
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "a52cd41e-2bcc-50ee-96a1-d645a06df922"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
An id like `practice/pqrst-estimate` has a namespace prefix with no owner. Two
|
||||
|
|
@ -95,6 +105,7 @@ Signing and trust scoring stay out of scope (§ 23, INTENT non-goals).
|
|||
id: CANP-WP-0002-T03
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "0505c790-e57e-568c-9c8c-376957c9b08e"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Largest gap between `INTENT.md` and the spec. Principle 9 ("composition without
|
||||
|
|
@ -114,6 +125,7 @@ the INTENT boundary. Do not introduce range resolution (INTENT non-goal).
|
|||
id: CANP-WP-0002-T04
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "0daf1097-6599-563f-8965-739cbc874ddf"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Cheapest item to pin down. `evals/` is a reserved path and `evals:` is a
|
||||
|
|
@ -133,6 +145,7 @@ eval files that declare the schema, and add one eval to
|
|||
id: CANP-WP-0002-T05
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "5beec7ba-e6c9-58b1-a065-b06aba015034"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
`dependencies.context` and `dependencies.capabilities` appear in the § 4
|
||||
|
|
@ -151,6 +164,7 @@ the two mechanisms must not describe the same thing twice.
|
|||
id: CANP-WP-0002-T06
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "06032689-fc19-5fcd-a76e-5dbc87d02cd4"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
After T01–T05 land, replace § 23's flat twelve-item list with two sections:
|
||||
|
|
@ -165,6 +179,7 @@ the format revision warrants it.
|
|||
id: CANP-WP-0002-T07
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: low
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "f642abe6-8222-5958-88ee-7a53454f2344"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Two defects found in the same review, independent of the format questions:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue