Register with Custodian State Hub and seed format open-questions workplan

Register canned-prompts under agents / practice (topic
c1d199b6-55ee-4db6-b49e-257a9f0f15ac, workplan prefix CANP-WP) via
`statehub register`, then replace the generated placeholders with
repo-specific facts.

- SCOPE.md: real boundaries drawn from INTENT.md's deliberate boundary,
  current state (spec v0.1 + reference CLI, 3/3 tests pass, example
  round-trips), and the developer workflow.
- AGENTS.md: drop the unresolved {CREDENTIAL_ROUTING} template token left
  by the generator.
- CANP-WP-0001: bootstrap tasks closed.
- CANP-WP-0002: new workplan carrying the five § 23 open questions promoted
  from "experience will decide" to "decide for v0.2" — optional-input
  defaults (static or derived), registry namespaces/ownership, prompt
  composition, canonical eval schemas, typed context/dependency contracts —
  plus two reference-implementation conformance defects found in review
  (prerelease versions sort as newest; copy_immutable packages the whole
  source directory).

Also lands the previously untracked seed: INTENT.md, the CPF v0.1 spec,
the reference CLI, and examples/pqrst-estimate.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bjefh8NUiEiahN4JLwoSKM

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 388925@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 3507023f-e0fd-4a1e-9d90-a0d4217d1502

examples/pqrst-estimate/prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+Review the coding session described below and produce a **PQRST Estimate** of
+where effort was spent.
+
+Use these categories:
+
+- **P — Main problem:** implementing or directly solving the requested deliverable.
+- **Q — Quality and tests:** tests, verification, edge cases, maintainability,
+  error handling, cleanup, and production-quality hardening.
+- **R — Research and context clarification:** reading the codebase or docs,
+  tracing behavior, investigating unknowns, reconciling requirements, and
+  establishing missing context.
+- **S — Security and credentials:** authentication, authorization, secrets,
+  credentials, trust boundaries, security validation, and security-specific
+  handling.
+- **T — Task organization:** planning, decomposition, todo management,
+  sequencing, coordination, and overhead required to keep the work organized.
+
+Treat this as a **post-session audit, not a planning estimate**. Estimate
+relative cognitive/work effort rather than tokens or wall-clock time. The five
+percentages **must sum to exactly 100%**.
+
+Where activities overlap, assign effort according to the primary purpose of the
+activity. Do not inflate a category merely because it was important; estimate
+how much effort it actually consumed.
+
+Session material:
+
+{{ session_summary }}
+
+Return:
+
+```text
+P: NN%
+Q: NN%
+R: NN%
+S: NN%
+T: NN%
+Total: 100%
+```
+
+Then provide:
+
+1. **Primary effort driver** — one sentence naming what dominated the session.
+2. **Interpretation** — what the distribution says about the session's shape.
+3. **Signal** — one notable imbalance, if any, that may be worth learning from.
+
+Include rationale: {{ include_rationale }}