CANP-WP-0002 T02: registry-scoped identity and namespace ownership
Section 17 already defined what a registry does when the same id@version is republished; nothing defined what a *consumer* does. That is where namespace conflict actually bites — in the catalog, after installing from two registries. Identity is now registry-scoped: an id names a package within a registry, the way a path names a file within a repository. A local-first format with no signing, no federation and no central authority cannot enforce global uniqueness, and an unenforceable guarantee is worse than none — it invites consumers to conflate two packages that merely share a name. A qualified `<registry>:<id>` reference distinguishes them, and `:` is now barred from ids so the separator stays available. Installing the same id from two registries is therefore not a conflict. The catalog is namespaced by registry and keeps both. Ownership is registry policy, not package data. An optional `registry.yaml` names a registry and records namespace claims. Those claims are explicitly descriptive — a filesystem registry cannot authenticate a publisher, and `publish` says so rather than implying it checked. Keeping the claim out of packages leaves artifacts free of unverifiable assertions of authority, and means package semantics do not change when a hosted registry appears later. Spec: 3.2 (registry-scoped identity, qualified references), 17 (immutability scoped to a registry), 20.1 and 20.2 (new), 18 (registry-manifest validation), 21 (qualified references, reserved `local` name). Reference CLI: parse_reference, check_registry_name, read_registry_manifest, registry_name, namespace_policy; registry_package_path and catalog_package_path split; resolve_installed reports ambiguity and returns the source registry; iter_catalog; `add --as`; closed-namespace warning on publish. Tests 11 -> 21. The catalog layout changed. An existing catalog is detected and reported with instructions rather than failing as "package not found". Signing, trust scoring and federation remain non-goals and were not touched. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bjefh8NUiEiahN4JLwoSKM Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 388925@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 3507023f-e0fd-4a1e-9d90-a0d4217d1502
This commit is contained in:
parent
4a8422e1aa
commit
ea70a59610
6 changed files with 533 additions and 45 deletions
27
README.md
27
README.md
|
|
@ -39,6 +39,15 @@ python canned_prompts.py publish ../examples/pqrst-estimate
|
|||
python canned_prompts.py install practice/pqrst-estimate --version 0.1.0
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Packages added from a path are filed under the registry name `local`; packages
|
||||
installed from a registry are filed under that registry's name. `search` prints
|
||||
qualified references:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
house:practice/pqrst-estimate@0.1.0 PQRST Estimate
|
||||
local:practice/pqrst-estimate@0.1.0 PQRST Estimate
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
By default the reference tool uses:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
|
|
@ -67,6 +76,24 @@ This reference tool never calls a model, so it resolves supplied values and
|
|||
static defaults only, and reports anything it cannot derive instead of
|
||||
rendering a prompt with a silent hole in it.
|
||||
|
||||
## Registries and identity
|
||||
|
||||
An id names a package *within a registry* (`CannedPromptFormat-v0.1.md`
|
||||
§ 3.2). The same id obtained from two registries may be two different
|
||||
packages, so the catalog keeps them apart and a bare id that matches more than
|
||||
one is reported as ambiguous rather than guessed. Qualify it when you need to:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
python canned_prompts.py render house:practice/pqrst-estimate --set ...
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
A registry may describe itself with an optional `registry.yaml` naming it and
|
||||
recording which namespaces are claimed and under what policy. Those claims are
|
||||
descriptive: a filesystem registry cannot authenticate a publisher, and
|
||||
signing and trust scoring are explicit non-goals. Ownership lives with the
|
||||
registry rather than in the package, so no package carries an unverifiable
|
||||
assertion of authority.
|
||||
|
||||
## Deliberate limitations
|
||||
|
||||
This seed has no hosted registry, model execution, authentication, network access, dependency resolver, or social features. `publish` and `install` operate on a filesystem registry so that the package semantics can be tested before infrastructure is built around them.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue