T11: dated rates and staleness become data, ahead of the 2026-08-31 flip
The price sheet had two defects of one shape -- a schema that could not
hold the fact it needed, the same criticism the cost survey levelled at
the State Hub.
CA-16 time-boxed rates are DATA. Sonnet's intro price lived in a
`# intro ...` comment and was invisible to the collector that
reads the file. Now promo_input/promo_output/promo_until,
applied per response at its own timestamp.
CA-17 the 90-day staleness rule was prose in MetricsAndScenarios 1a
that every M-D2-CST verdict silently inherited. Now `recorded`
+ `max_age_days` in the sheet, and a stale sheet ABORTS.
Both are exercised by make cost-test: the promo rate must apply before
2026-08-31 and lapse after, and a 102-day-old sheet must trip.
Applying CA-16 moved AC-1 from $93.32 to $93.15 -- the $0.17 CB-EV-0002
predicted, now collected rather than noted. That is a legitimate
retarget under T07's distinction: the instrument disproved the target,
and its output is in this commit. The number has now been stated five
times ($248.46, $92.21, $92.87, $93.32, $93.15), each correction from a
different mechanism.
Evidence tables regenerated from the tool rather than hand-patched,
per CA-15 -- which is the rule that exists because hand-typed tables
were the only thing the adversarial review found wrong.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-31 09:23:29 +02:00
|
|
|
# USD per million tokens. Source: Anthropic pricing.
|
|
|
|
|
# Governed by specs/CostAccounting.md §9 — a stale sheet invalidates new
|
|
|
|
|
# M-D2-CST `better` verdicts. Staleness is enforced by `make cost-test`,
|
|
|
|
|
# not by this comment.
|
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
|
# Dated rates are DATA, not comments. A promotional rate written as a
|
|
|
|
|
# comment is invisible to the collector that reads this file: the sonnet
|
|
|
|
|
# intro price sat in a `#` remark and was silently ignored, costing $0.17
|
|
|
|
|
# on a $93.32 pass and heading for a sign flip on 2026-08-31.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
recorded = 2026-07-31
|
|
|
|
|
max_age_days = 90
|
2026-07-31 00:53:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[claude-fable-5]
|
|
|
|
|
input = 10.00
|
|
|
|
|
output = 50.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[claude-opus-5]
|
|
|
|
|
input = 5.00
|
|
|
|
|
output = 25.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[claude-sonnet-5]
|
T11: dated rates and staleness become data, ahead of the 2026-08-31 flip
The price sheet had two defects of one shape -- a schema that could not
hold the fact it needed, the same criticism the cost survey levelled at
the State Hub.
CA-16 time-boxed rates are DATA. Sonnet's intro price lived in a
`# intro ...` comment and was invisible to the collector that
reads the file. Now promo_input/promo_output/promo_until,
applied per response at its own timestamp.
CA-17 the 90-day staleness rule was prose in MetricsAndScenarios 1a
that every M-D2-CST verdict silently inherited. Now `recorded`
+ `max_age_days` in the sheet, and a stale sheet ABORTS.
Both are exercised by make cost-test: the promo rate must apply before
2026-08-31 and lapse after, and a 102-day-old sheet must trip.
Applying CA-16 moved AC-1 from $93.32 to $93.15 -- the $0.17 CB-EV-0002
predicted, now collected rather than noted. That is a legitimate
retarget under T07's distinction: the instrument disproved the target,
and its output is in this commit. The number has now been stated five
times ($248.46, $92.21, $92.87, $93.32, $93.15), each correction from a
different mechanism.
Evidence tables regenerated from the tool rather than hand-patched,
per CA-15 -- which is the rule that exists because hand-typed tables
were the only thing the adversarial review found wrong.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-31 09:23:29 +02:00
|
|
|
input = 3.00
|
|
|
|
|
output = 15.00
|
|
|
|
|
# Promotional rate in force through `until` (inclusive); the collector
|
|
|
|
|
# applies it to any response whose timestamp falls on or before that date.
|
|
|
|
|
promo_input = 2.00
|
|
|
|
|
promo_output = 10.00
|
|
|
|
|
promo_until = 2026-08-31
|
2026-07-31 00:53:22 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[claude-haiku-4-5]
|
|
|
|
|
input = 1.00
|
|
|
|
|
output = 5.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[cache] # multipliers on the input price
|
|
|
|
|
read = 0.1
|
|
|
|
|
write_5m = 1.25
|
|
|
|
|
write_1h = 2.0
|