clay-borg/editions/modules/problem_stress/scoped/Problems.csv

22 lines
6.9 KiB
CSV
Raw Normal View History

ADR-0022 + CB-WP-0048 T00: the selector decision, and the mirror held The maintainer's observation decided the design: aspects partition the GAME, strata partition our apparatus, and they are orthogonal. A module is one coordinate change in aspect space with an obligation in every stratum. So aspect identity must NOT be Rust types -- an aspect ground-game adds would make clay-borg fail to parse a configuration rather than fail to run it, welding the two coordinate systems at the one place they must stay independent. Chosen: identity as data (Configuration round-trips anything the catalog names), behaviour exhaustive (Rules, no catch-all), resolve() between. Decisive argument: the catalog ALREADY ships modules with a rules_delta and status: proposed, so a per-aspect enum would report them as "unknown module" -- indistinguishable from a typo, a false statement about the edition, and this project's signature failure shape. Two facts need two errors. Federating design authority is permanent, so the representation must outlive the implementation. Legacy ids alias forever through the catalog's own legacy_experiment_id, on the standard-Np precedent: 26 recordings name them and the expansion is exact, so there is nothing to deprecate. T00 done: the schema-2 mirror had arrived with no digests (19 files) and edition-check was red. Digests are now generated by WALKING editions/, not typed -- two reviews already found hand-written lists that made their own controls vacuous, and a mirror that grows a directory is what breaks a maintained list. PROVENANCE-catalog.md was a file inside the mirrored tree that upstream does not have; folded into our own PROVENANCE.md, since provenance about the mirror does not belong inside the thing it describes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-08 22:07:57 +02:00
problem_id,scenario_id,visibility,stress_scope,hidden_priority,title,problem_text,required_solution,symbol_id,point_value,front_rules,reveal_effect,unresolved_effect,back_design_id
PRB_01_S,SCN_01,Surface,global,0,Deadline Missed,A promised result was not delivered when expected.,Repair,SYM_REPAIR,2,Resolve with Repair. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=global (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM_SURFACE
PRB_01_1,SCN_01,Hidden,personal,1,Unclear Ownership,Responsibility for the commitment and the work was never made explicit.,Clarify,SYM_CLARIFY,2,Resolve with Clarify. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=personal (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM
PRB_01_2,SCN_01,Hidden,personal,2,Unspoken Overload,The work required more capacity than someone could safely or fairly provide.,Boundary,SYM_BOUNDARY,2,Resolve with Boundary. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=personal (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM
PRB_01_3,SCN_01,Hidden,bond,3,Bad News Was Delayed,A warning was withheld until the remaining options became worse.,Repair,SYM_REPAIR,3,Resolve with Repair. Value: 3.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=bond (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM
PRB_01_4,SCN_01,Hidden,personal,4,No Checkpoint Process,The group had no reliable moment for testing progress and changing course.,Change,SYM_CHANGE,3,Resolve with Change. Value: 3.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=personal (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM
PRB_02_S,SCN_02,Surface,global,0,Shared Task Left Undone,"A recurring responsibility was not completed, and others absorbed the impact.",Repair,SYM_REPAIR,2,Resolve with Repair. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=global (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM_SURFACE
Apply ground-game's rulings: mastery in points, four boards, and a vendor tool that covers what the gate checks They ruled on all seven items the same day. Two were actionable here. F28 RULED: points. Modes.csv MODE_COOP clarified upstream to say "penalties apply to points, not card count"; mastery is now total - blame - denied. A recorded scenario went red on it -- gr-e02-shared-ground pinned 0 (2 claimed CARDS - 1 - 1) and now expects 2 (4 POINTS - 1 - 1). The number moved because the rule was decided, not because the engine drifted, and the scenario records both rulings; its schema has no field for a second one, so both live in ruled_note with `ruled` carrying the LATEST date. F29 RULED not-intended and APPLIED upstream: SCN_02's suits re-tuned the same day. The characterisation test is how we found out -- it pinned the duplication, went red on the re-tune, and that red WAS the notification. It now asserts every pair distinct, the stronger statement the duplication had made unavailable. SCN_02 re-measures at 73 at 2p, not 67: its own board now. F26/F30 ruled and recorded. F30's ruling incidentally confirms our reading -- they name priority-2's suit as the first lever, which is the difference we identified without having measured causation. vendor-editions grew twice, both times because it covered less than the gate it exists to satisfy: - It refused to touch ground-darvo-r0/ on the reasoning that the baseline is "a separate record". That was wrong within the hour: ground-game clarified Modes.csv and `make vendor` reported a clean sync while edition-check went red. A sync tool that covers less than its check reports success into a red gate. - Its two-block rewrite DETECTED which fence held which set and preserved the arrangement -- faithfully preserving a swap an earlier write had introduced, leaving each fence under a heading describing the other. edition-check reads every sha256 line flat and passed throughout: a document can be self-consistently wrong and green. Order is now asserted, with a control that goes red on a swap. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-09 00:15:14 +02:00
PRB_02_1,SCN_02,Hidden,personal,1,Different Standards,"Players were using different definitions of complete, timely, or fair.",Change,SYM_CHANGE,2,Resolve with Change. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=personal (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM
PRB_02_2,SCN_02,Hidden,personal,2,Invisible Workload,Some contributions and constraints were not visible to the group.,Clarify,SYM_CLARIFY,2,Resolve with Clarify. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=personal (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM
PRB_02_3,SCN_02,Hidden,bond,3,Resentment Never Raised,Frustration accumulated without a direct request or acknowledgement.,Boundary,SYM_BOUNDARY,3,Resolve with Boundary. Value: 3.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=bond (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM
PRB_02_4,SCN_02,Hidden,personal,4,No Ownership Routine,The group relied on goodwill instead of a dependable allocation method.,Repair,SYM_REPAIR,3,Resolve with Repair. Value: 3.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=personal (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM
ADR-0022 + CB-WP-0048 T00: the selector decision, and the mirror held The maintainer's observation decided the design: aspects partition the GAME, strata partition our apparatus, and they are orthogonal. A module is one coordinate change in aspect space with an obligation in every stratum. So aspect identity must NOT be Rust types -- an aspect ground-game adds would make clay-borg fail to parse a configuration rather than fail to run it, welding the two coordinate systems at the one place they must stay independent. Chosen: identity as data (Configuration round-trips anything the catalog names), behaviour exhaustive (Rules, no catch-all), resolve() between. Decisive argument: the catalog ALREADY ships modules with a rules_delta and status: proposed, so a per-aspect enum would report them as "unknown module" -- indistinguishable from a typo, a false statement about the edition, and this project's signature failure shape. Two facts need two errors. Federating design authority is permanent, so the representation must outlive the implementation. Legacy ids alias forever through the catalog's own legacy_experiment_id, on the standard-Np precedent: 26 recordings name them and the expansion is exact, so there is nothing to deprecate. T00 done: the schema-2 mirror had arrived with no digests (19 files) and edition-check was red. Digests are now generated by WALKING editions/, not typed -- two reviews already found hand-written lists that made their own controls vacuous, and a mirror that grows a directory is what breaks a maintained list. PROVENANCE-catalog.md was a file inside the mirrored tree that upstream does not have; folded into our own PROVENANCE.md, since provenance about the mirror does not belong inside the thing it describes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-08 22:07:57 +02:00
PRB_03_S,SCN_03,Surface,global,0,Decision Announced as Settled,A group-affecting choice was presented as final before meaningful agreement.,Boundary,SYM_BOUNDARY,2,Resolve with Boundary. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=global (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM_SURFACE
PRB_03_1,SCN_03,Hidden,personal,1,Mandate Was Ambiguous,"It was unclear who could decide, advise, consent, or veto.",Clarify,SYM_CLARIFY,2,Resolve with Clarify. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=personal (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM
PRB_03_2,SCN_03,Hidden,personal,2,Contributions Were Dismissed,Relevant input was ignored or treated as less legitimate.,Repair,SYM_REPAIR,2,Resolve with Repair. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=personal (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM
PRB_03_3,SCN_03,Hidden,bond,3,One Voice Spoke for Others,A player claimed authority to represent people who had not agreed.,Boundary,SYM_BOUNDARY,3,Resolve with Boundary. Value: 3.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=bond (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM
PRB_03_4,SCN_03,Hidden,personal,4,No Decision Rule,The group had no shared method for turning discussion into a legitimate choice.,Change,SYM_CHANGE,3,Resolve with Change. Value: 3.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=personal (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM
PRB_04_S,SCN_04,Surface,global,0,Private Information Spread,Information moved beyond the circle in which it was originally shared.,Repair,SYM_REPAIR,2,Resolve with Repair. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=global (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM_SURFACE
PRB_04_1,SCN_04,Hidden,personal,1,Confidentiality Was Assumed,The players never made the scope of confidentiality explicit.,Clarify,SYM_CLARIFY,2,Resolve with Clarify. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=personal (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM
PRB_04_2,SCN_04,Hidden,personal,2,Exposure Caused Harm,"The sharing changed another player's safety, reputation, or freedom to choose.",Repair,SYM_REPAIR,2,Resolve with Repair. Value: 2.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=personal (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM
PRB_04_3,SCN_04,Hidden,bond,3,Consent Boundary Was Ignored,A clear or reasonably expected limit on sharing was crossed.,Boundary,SYM_BOUNDARY,3,Resolve with Boundary. Value: 3.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=bond (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM
PRB_04_4,SCN_04,Hidden,personal,4,No Sharing Protocol,"The group lacked a repeatable rule for consent, need-to-know, and escalation.",Change,SYM_CHANGE,3,Resolve with Change. Value: 3.,None in the core set.,"H2: while unclaimed, +1 Stress at Round End to stress_scope=personal (personal=owner; bond=owner's Bond network; global=all).",BACK_PROBLEM