CB-WP-0038: variant selection, H1 implemented, and H1 measured
ground-game packages hypotheses as selectable rules variants — a catalog,
a rules_delta.yaml, and prose — and their note is explicit that CSV text
alone is not executable here. So the kernel gains a Variant in game state:
in the state, therefore in the hash, therefore in the recording, because a
scenario replayed under a different variant would diverge silently.
Baseline is bit-for-bit what it was, asserted across seat counts and
seeds. A variant system that perturbs the baseline invalidates every
measurement this repo has.
H1-A and H1-B implemented from rules_delta.yaml and mutation-proven on
their own defects: "unclaimed" misread as face-up-and-unsolved, and the
attacker's Stress read after the attack's effects. Their `unchanged:` list
is asserted rather than trusted — that list is their claim about their own
experiment.
Measured, and three of their four criteria fail. DARVO arm rate is still
0 under greedy; ATTACK selection does not rise and falls for the rank-75
policy; group success collapses from 165/190/200 to 0 at 3/4/6 seats.
The mechanism is not the assumed one: greedy answers the pressure by
regulating, Stress plateaus at 3, so it never reaches the gate at 4 or the
arm at 5 — H1-A acts as a solve-rate tax and H1-B is unreachable under
competent play.
A harness defect was caught before the claim: sweep discarded refused
games silently and never reported its count, so "nobody won" and "nothing
played" printed identically. Reporting H1 as unwinnable on that basis
would have been the ADR-0018 family aimed at another repo's design. All
200 games ran in every cell; the zeros are real.
Chaos d8 = 8 — the window's first override, redrew L against a structural
L, so it changed nothing. Window 3 recorded in ChaosRollHistory.
NOT REVIEWED: tier L owes a separate-agent adversarial review, and no H1
result may reach ground-game until it has run.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-08 00:50:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
# Selectable GROUND edition / rules packages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Schema docs: CATALOG.md
|
|
|
|
|
|
# clay-borg: pin by variant_id → path (+ optional git_pin).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
schema_version: 1
|
2026-08-08 11:43:13 +02:00
|
|
|
|
updated: "2026-08-08"
|
CB-WP-0038: variant selection, H1 implemented, and H1 measured
ground-game packages hypotheses as selectable rules variants — a catalog,
a rules_delta.yaml, and prose — and their note is explicit that CSV text
alone is not executable here. So the kernel gains a Variant in game state:
in the state, therefore in the hash, therefore in the recording, because a
scenario replayed under a different variant would diverge silently.
Baseline is bit-for-bit what it was, asserted across seat counts and
seeds. A variant system that perturbs the baseline invalidates every
measurement this repo has.
H1-A and H1-B implemented from rules_delta.yaml and mutation-proven on
their own defects: "unclaimed" misread as face-up-and-unsolved, and the
attacker's Stress read after the attack's effects. Their `unchanged:` list
is asserted rather than trusted — that list is their claim about their own
experiment.
Measured, and three of their four criteria fail. DARVO arm rate is still
0 under greedy; ATTACK selection does not rise and falls for the rank-75
policy; group success collapses from 165/190/200 to 0 at 3/4/6 seats.
The mechanism is not the assumed one: greedy answers the pressure by
regulating, Stress plateaus at 3, so it never reaches the gate at 4 or the
arm at 5 — H1-A acts as a solve-rate tax and H1-B is unreachable under
competent play.
A harness defect was caught before the claim: sweep discarded refused
games silently and never reported its count, so "nobody won" and "nothing
played" printed identically. Reporting H1 as unwinnable on that basis
would have been the ADR-0018 family aimed at another repo's design. All
200 games ran in every cell; the zeros are real.
Chaos d8 = 8 — the window's first override, redrew L against a structural
L, so it changed nothing. Window 3 recorded in ChaosRollHistory.
NOT REVIEWED: tier L owes a separate-agent adversarial review, and no H1
result may reach ground-game until it has run.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-08 00:50:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
default_variant: ground-darvo-r0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
packages:
|
|
|
|
|
|
- variant_id: ground-darvo-r0
|
|
|
|
|
|
path: editions/ground-darvo-r0
|
|
|
|
|
|
kind: baseline
|
|
|
|
|
|
base: null
|
|
|
|
|
|
selectable: true
|
|
|
|
|
|
status: baseline
|
|
|
|
|
|
dataset_id: GROUND-DARVO-CORE-0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
title: "GROUND DARVO Edition — core r0"
|
|
|
|
|
|
summary: >
|
|
|
|
|
|
Playtest baseline. Surface + hidden 1..k deal; available 6/9/12;
|
|
|
|
|
|
thresholds 5/7/9. Stress ledger has no problem pressure; ATTACK
|
|
|
|
|
|
does not self-soothe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
hypothesis_ref: null
|
|
|
|
|
|
workplan_ref: null
|
|
|
|
|
|
rules_delta: null
|
|
|
|
|
|
changed_files: []
|
|
|
|
|
|
utility_estimate: >
|
2026-08-08 11:43:13 +02:00
|
|
|
|
Ship-default. RPT-0003 + CB-EV-0031: under non-attacking competent
|
|
|
|
|
|
policies, peak Stress held never exceeds start 2 — ATTACK is the
|
|
|
|
|
|
sole inbound pressure. Keep pinned until a successor is accepted.
|
CB-WP-0038: variant selection, H1 implemented, and H1 measured
ground-game packages hypotheses as selectable rules variants — a catalog,
a rules_delta.yaml, and prose — and their note is explicit that CSV text
alone is not executable here. So the kernel gains a Variant in game state:
in the state, therefore in the hash, therefore in the recording, because a
scenario replayed under a different variant would diverge silently.
Baseline is bit-for-bit what it was, asserted across seat counts and
seeds. A variant system that perturbs the baseline invalidates every
measurement this repo has.
H1-A and H1-B implemented from rules_delta.yaml and mutation-proven on
their own defects: "unclaimed" misread as face-up-and-unsolved, and the
attacker's Stress read after the attack's effects. Their `unchanged:` list
is asserted rather than trusted — that list is their claim about their own
experiment.
Measured, and three of their four criteria fail. DARVO arm rate is still
0 under greedy; ATTACK selection does not rise and falls for the rank-75
policy; group success collapses from 165/190/200 to 0 at 3/4/6 seats.
The mechanism is not the assumed one: greedy answers the pressure by
regulating, Stress plateaus at 3, so it never reaches the gate at 4 or the
arm at 5 — H1-A acts as a solve-rate tax and H1-B is unreachable under
competent play.
A harness defect was caught before the claim: sweep discarded refused
games silently and never reported its count, so "nobody won" and "nothing
played" printed identically. Reporting H1 as unwinnable on that basis
would have been the ADR-0018 family aimed at another repo's design. All
200 games ran in every cell; the zeros are real.
Chaos d8 = 8 — the window's first override, redrew L against a structural
L, so it changed nothing. Window 3 recorded in ChaosRollHistory.
NOT REVIEWED: tier L owes a separate-agent adversarial review, and no H1
result may reach ground-game until it has run.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-08 00:50:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
decision: none
|
|
|
|
|
|
git_pin: null
|
|
|
|
|
|
clay_borg_notes: >
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vendor CSVs as today (Problems, Actions, Solutions, Modes, Tokens).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kernel implements printed r0 rules.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- variant_id: h1-problem-stress
|
|
|
|
|
|
path: editions/experiments/h1-problem-stress
|
|
|
|
|
|
kind: experiment
|
|
|
|
|
|
base: ground-darvo-r0
|
|
|
|
|
|
selectable: true
|
2026-08-08 11:43:13 +02:00
|
|
|
|
status: measured
|
CB-WP-0038: variant selection, H1 implemented, and H1 measured
ground-game packages hypotheses as selectable rules variants — a catalog,
a rules_delta.yaml, and prose — and their note is explicit that CSV text
alone is not executable here. So the kernel gains a Variant in game state:
in the state, therefore in the hash, therefore in the recording, because a
scenario replayed under a different variant would diverge silently.
Baseline is bit-for-bit what it was, asserted across seat counts and
seeds. A variant system that perturbs the baseline invalidates every
measurement this repo has.
H1-A and H1-B implemented from rules_delta.yaml and mutation-proven on
their own defects: "unclaimed" misread as face-up-and-unsolved, and the
attacker's Stress read after the attack's effects. Their `unchanged:` list
is asserted rather than trusted — that list is their claim about their own
experiment.
Measured, and three of their four criteria fail. DARVO arm rate is still
0 under greedy; ATTACK selection does not rise and falls for the rank-75
policy; group success collapses from 165/190/200 to 0 at 3/4/6 seats.
The mechanism is not the assumed one: greedy answers the pressure by
regulating, Stress plateaus at 3, so it never reaches the gate at 4 or the
arm at 5 — H1-A acts as a solve-rate tax and H1-B is unreachable under
competent play.
A harness defect was caught before the claim: sweep discarded refused
games silently and never reported its count, so "nobody won" and "nothing
played" printed identically. Reporting H1 as unwinnable on that basis
would have been the ADR-0018 family aimed at another repo's design. All
200 games ran in every cell; the zeros are real.
Chaos d8 = 8 — the window's first override, redrew L against a structural
L, so it changed nothing. Window 3 recorded in ChaosRollHistory.
NOT REVIEWED: tier L owes a separate-agent adversarial review, and no H1
result may reach ground-game until it has run.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-08 00:50:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
dataset_id: GROUND-DARVO-EXP-H1-0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
title: "H1 — problem pressure + high-stress ATTACK self-soothe"
|
|
|
|
|
|
summary: >
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two deltas only: (A) +1 Stress each player at Round End if any
|
|
|
|
|
|
Problem remains unclaimed; (B) uncancelled ACT_ATTACK by a seat
|
|
|
|
|
|
at Stress ≥4 gives that seat −1 Stress. Thresholds/deal unchanged.
|
|
|
|
|
|
hypothesis_ref: history/260807-attack-darvo-stress-design.md
|
|
|
|
|
|
workplan_ref: workplans/GROUND-WP-0006-h1-problem-stress-experiment.md
|
2026-08-08 11:43:13 +02:00
|
|
|
|
measurement_ref: reports/260808-clay-borg-h1-measured.md
|
CB-WP-0038: variant selection, H1 implemented, and H1 measured
ground-game packages hypotheses as selectable rules variants — a catalog,
a rules_delta.yaml, and prose — and their note is explicit that CSV text
alone is not executable here. So the kernel gains a Variant in game state:
in the state, therefore in the hash, therefore in the recording, because a
scenario replayed under a different variant would diverge silently.
Baseline is bit-for-bit what it was, asserted across seat counts and
seeds. A variant system that perturbs the baseline invalidates every
measurement this repo has.
H1-A and H1-B implemented from rules_delta.yaml and mutation-proven on
their own defects: "unclaimed" misread as face-up-and-unsolved, and the
attacker's Stress read after the attack's effects. Their `unchanged:` list
is asserted rather than trusted — that list is their claim about their own
experiment.
Measured, and three of their four criteria fail. DARVO arm rate is still
0 under greedy; ATTACK selection does not rise and falls for the rank-75
policy; group success collapses from 165/190/200 to 0 at 3/4/6 seats.
The mechanism is not the assumed one: greedy answers the pressure by
regulating, Stress plateaus at 3, so it never reaches the gate at 4 or the
arm at 5 — H1-A acts as a solve-rate tax and H1-B is unreachable under
competent play.
A harness defect was caught before the claim: sweep discarded refused
games silently and never reported its count, so "nobody won" and "nothing
played" printed identically. Reporting H1 as unwinnable on that basis
would have been the ADR-0018 family aimed at another repo's design. All
200 games ran in every cell; the zeros are real.
Chaos d8 = 8 — the window's first override, redrew L against a structural
L, so it changed nothing. Window 3 recorded in ChaosRollHistory.
NOT REVIEWED: tier L owes a separate-agent adversarial review, and no H1
result may reach ground-game until it has run.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-08 00:50:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
rules_delta: editions/experiments/h1-problem-stress/rules_delta.yaml
|
|
|
|
|
|
changed_files:
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Actions.csv
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Rules_Text.csv
|
|
|
|
|
|
- metadata.json
|
|
|
|
|
|
utility_estimate: >
|
2026-08-08 11:43:13 +02:00
|
|
|
|
Measured 2026-08-08 (CB-EV-0030/0031; instrument caveat applies).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direction right, magnitude wrong: H1-A is a solve-rate tax that
|
|
|
|
|
|
competent seats absorb with GROUND (Stress ~3); H1-B never fires
|
|
|
|
|
|
for them. DARVO arms for unregulated seats; group wins collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
to 0 at 3p+ under greedy SHARED GROUND. Do not promote as-is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
decision: reject-as-baseline
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Package stays selectable for regression compare; not a ship pin.
|
CB-WP-0038: variant selection, H1 implemented, and H1 measured
ground-game packages hypotheses as selectable rules variants — a catalog,
a rules_delta.yaml, and prose — and their note is explicit that CSV text
alone is not executable here. So the kernel gains a Variant in game state:
in the state, therefore in the hash, therefore in the recording, because a
scenario replayed under a different variant would diverge silently.
Baseline is bit-for-bit what it was, asserted across seat counts and
seeds. A variant system that perturbs the baseline invalidates every
measurement this repo has.
H1-A and H1-B implemented from rules_delta.yaml and mutation-proven on
their own defects: "unclaimed" misread as face-up-and-unsolved, and the
attacker's Stress read after the attack's effects. Their `unchanged:` list
is asserted rather than trusted — that list is their claim about their own
experiment.
Measured, and three of their four criteria fail. DARVO arm rate is still
0 under greedy; ATTACK selection does not rise and falls for the rank-75
policy; group success collapses from 165/190/200 to 0 at 3/4/6 seats.
The mechanism is not the assumed one: greedy answers the pressure by
regulating, Stress plateaus at 3, so it never reaches the gate at 4 or the
arm at 5 — H1-A acts as a solve-rate tax and H1-B is unreachable under
competent play.
A harness defect was caught before the claim: sweep discarded refused
games silently and never reported its count, so "nobody won" and "nothing
played" printed identically. Reporting H1 as unwinnable on that basis
would have been the ADR-0018 family aimed at another repo's design. All
200 games ran in every cell; the zeros are real.
Chaos d8 = 8 — the window's first override, redrew L against a structural
L, so it changed nothing. Window 3 recorded in ChaosRollHistory.
NOT REVIEWED: tier L owes a separate-agent adversarial review, and no H1
result may reach ground-game until it has run.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-08 00:50:08 +02:00
|
|
|
|
git_pin: null
|
|
|
|
|
|
clay_borg_notes: >
|
2026-08-08 11:43:13 +02:00
|
|
|
|
Kernel implements H1-A/H1-B. Keep for A/B against successors (H2…).
|