CB-WP-0009-T01: the meta budget measures the pass it governs
ADR-0006 D1. cb-cost gains pass_costs, which buckets responses into workplan windows in a single read of the transcripts — calling collect() once per boundary would re-read every transcript per window, and status is supposed to stay cheap enough that nobody replaces it with ls. make status now reports the share over a trailing three passes with the per-pass breakdown, keeps the lifetime figure labelled NOT the metric, and prints the D2 exemption so the next reader does not re-derive the standoff where the budget blocked its own repair. One pass would be a coin flip: a meta pass reads 100%, a product pass 0%. Three is the smallest window where the ratio means something and still moves. First reading: 36% over the last three passes against 49% lifetime, with CB-WP-0008 at 0%. The first run reported $0.00 for every window. Transcript stamps are UTC Z and git prints a local offset, so the string comparison put every response before the first boundary. Both the fix and a self-test for it are in; reverting the conversion turns four checks red. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f4dccb6f99
commit
38f237fc5c
3 changed files with 194 additions and 26 deletions
|
|
@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
|||
id: CB-WP-0009
|
||||
kind: meta
|
||||
title: "Make control gates experimental: window them, review them, cash them out"
|
||||
status: proposed
|
||||
status: in_progress
|
||||
authorized_above_budget: "maintainer, 2026-08-01 — 'improve our policies where it seems promising; we will experiment our way to sensible task- and context-specific control and review gates'. Meta read 59% at the time."
|
||||
state_hub_workstream_id: "98c0af4a-415c-4cf5-92d0-a722eb70cb90"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
|
@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ prose has not delivered.
|
|||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: CB-WP-0009-T01
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
status: done
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "c6eefacd-5bb9-4640-8356-12e8112bcf11"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
|
@ -53,6 +53,11 @@ it was a pure product pass — against 61% cumulative.
|
|||
**Refuted if** the two land within 20% of each other, in which case D1 is
|
||||
wrong and the machinery should be deleted rather than kept.
|
||||
|
||||
**Done 2026-08-01.** `cb-cost.pass_costs` buckets by pass window in one
|
||||
read of the transcripts; `make status` reports a trailing 3-pass share
|
||||
with the per-pass breakdown and the exemption. First reading **36% over
|
||||
the last 3 passes** against **49% lifetime** — CB-WP-0008 alone reads 0%.
|
||||
|
||||
## Task: `gates.toml` and `make gate-review`
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue