GROUND-RPT-0007: correct our H1 report — H1-B was never measured
Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Failing after 4s
Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Failing after 4s
Reported to ground-game as a CORRECTION to GROUND-RPT-0004, not a new result. Half of H1 was never measured: every game behind that verdict was played by bots that never attacked, and H1-B acts only on an uncancelled ATTACK at the stress gate. The rejection stands on H1-A, but 'H1-B does nothing' was never established and is false. Also carries the structural finding -- a module can be unreachable because of an aspect it does not name -- with an ask: should a module declare its reachability preconditions, so a consumer reports 'not reachable in this configuration' rather than a number that reads as a null result? Repeats the two unanswered items from RPT-0006: the competitive modes are weakly tested (no bot models a rival), and problem_stress.scoped cannot reach a decision in round one. Left uncommitted in their tree, as with every prior report. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ab6e6e5058
commit
4ec165c991
2 changed files with 9 additions and 3 deletions
|
|
@ -138,6 +138,13 @@ are the whole register and `make design` reads them from here.
|
|||
and at `+55` (module-aware) the module never fires; at `110` it fires
|
||||
in every game. Nothing about the module changed — only whether any seat
|
||||
ever gave it a turn.
|
||||
|
||||
**Reported to ground-game 2026-08-09** as GROUND-RPT-0007, framed as a
|
||||
correction to GROUND-RPT-0004 rather than a new result. Carries one
|
||||
ask: whether a module should declare its **reachability preconditions**
|
||||
— the conditions under which it can act at all — so a consumer can
|
||||
report *"not reachable in this configuration"* instead of a number that
|
||||
reads as a null result.
|
||||
- **F30 — SCN_04 is materially harder at 2 players.** 52/100 group
|
||||
success against 67 and 73, with **every other parameter held by the
|
||||
edition itself**: same deal shape, same 6 available points, same
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -135,9 +135,8 @@ now known to be false.
|
|||
three-dimensional sweep and nothing yet says the modules behave the
|
||||
same under the competitive modes — where, per CB-EV-0033, *who wins*
|
||||
moves even when group success does not.
|
||||
- **ground-game has not been told about F31.** It bears on a verdict we
|
||||
already reported to them (H1's rejection), and a correction we owe is
|
||||
worth more than one we volunteer.
|
||||
- ~~**ground-game has not been told about F31.**~~ Reported 2026-08-09 as
|
||||
GROUND-RPT-0007, as a correction to GROUND-RPT-0004.
|
||||
- **The scope term is inert at round-one positions** (CB-WP-0049 T04), so
|
||||
`problem_stress.scoped`'s measured effect is driven by later rounds.
|
||||
The panel does not report per-round effect, and that is where the
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue