coulomb/clay-borg
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Sync hub IDs for CB-WP-0006; T04-T06 cancel not deferred
Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Failing after 3s
Details

Browse source 
The hub's task status vocabulary is wait|todo|progress|done|cancel, so
'deferred' was rejected by fix-consistency. 'cancel' is the accurate one:
these task records are superseded and equivalents live in CB-WP-0006
T05-T07. The work is deferred, not abandoned, and the workplan says so.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-07-31 17:56:55 +02:00
parent 74d9b8ef73
commit 56c0c34d2c
3 changed files with 34 additions and 9 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

10
workplans/CB-WP-0006-instrument-the-table.md
View file

@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
id: CB-WP-0006
title: "Instrument the acceptance table, then implement what it exposes"
status: proposed
state_hub_workstream_id: "8a6327cc-fd5c-4e2c-a29b-b437c27d1e71"
---
# Purpose
@ -39,6 +40,7 @@ Per InnerLoop §Step 4, no target moves in the commit that measures it.
id: CB-WP-0006-T01
status: todo
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "a4513794-2f5f-480c-be30-56658711796f"
```
The sharpest single finding of CB-WP-0005. **Nothing in the workspace
@ -67,6 +69,7 @@ to `red`.
id: CB-WP-0006-T02
status: todo
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "d1572a4f-46e5-49dd-b1ec-7c371a780bb7"
```
AM-2 (≤40 spec lines per rule) and AM-3 (≤50 LOC for the synthetic
@ -88,6 +91,7 @@ restated or withdrawn with an argument rather than left unmeasured.
id: CB-WP-0006-T03
status: todo
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "6c84a220-cab3-40f1-b35f-b8df79106f6e"
```
AM-5 (clean build ≤60 s) is `recorded not gated` — and not recorded
@ -106,6 +110,7 @@ leaving them blank while the scoreboard reports elsewhere.
id: CB-WP-0006-T04
status: todo
priority: low
state_hub_task_id: "a2571314-4c02-41cf-9473-96d3ae2d7b2b"
```
`reported, not targeted`, so there is no property to invert and it counts
@ -135,6 +140,7 @@ threshold *after* seeing that movement would be the retarget InnerLoop
id: CB-WP-0006-T05
status: todo
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "2a357dbf-3861-499d-a12e-f7682b7332f6"
```
Inherited from CB-WP-0005 T04. K9's acceptance property (snapshot at N +
@ -153,6 +159,7 @@ exists and the suite does not.
id: CB-WP-0006-T06
status: todo
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "d459444d-41be-40c5-9101-7a8420b42fb6"
```
Inherited from CB-WP-0005 T05. INTENT design decision 8 of 10,
@ -171,6 +178,7 @@ about.
id: CB-WP-0006-T07
status: todo
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "d76ad893-520b-44bd-9b77-07dbfb651ce3"
```
Inherited from CB-WP-0005 T06. `CommitWindow` has zero non-test users;
@ -187,6 +195,7 @@ right for K18.
id: CB-WP-0006-T08
status: todo
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "1d4455c3-c642-47d8-916b-ab35bc512207"
```
Commit `evidence/CB-EV-0004`. The baseline is **4 of 14**, committed and
@ -210,6 +219,7 @@ Three tests, all reported:
id: CB-WP-0006-T09
status: todo
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "4f291d5a-90f0-4f1f-bcaf-7ec28856bfcf"
```
The question CB-WP-0005 T08 raised and this pass is positioned to answer.