coulomb/clay-borg
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

CB-WP-0022 T03: ADR-0012 -- the register already existed, and the rule was

Browse source 
one clause short

Nine decisions. Two were not on T03's list; both are the review's.

D2: specs/GroundRules.md §Underdetermined IS the register. C4 pointed out
it was never evaluated as a candidate, and against the survey's own five
benchmarks it already delivers four -- including the Magic Oracle property
("a ruling flips the scenario, not the kernel", :231-233) that the survey
travelled to Magic to discover and we had written down ourselves eight
days earlier. What it lacks is reproductions. So this pass extends a
section rather than building a register: no new file, no new schema, and
no second mechanism to disagree with the first.

D3: admissibility is three clauses. It exists; it has the ruled shape
(GROUND-WP-0004 T02's row-level table, never a sum -- promoted from a T04
addendum because two of three wrong premises were sums without tables);
and it CAN FAIL. The third is C1's. GR-E01's scenario went green when the
edition landed, and the finding stayed admissible and stayed queued for
transmission, because nothing in the rule said a passing artifact was a
signal. A green reproduction is an alarm, not a reassurance.

D1 applied: INTENT gains a fourth property, Instrument, worded as a
mechanism rather than an ambition and carrying its own falsifier -- if a
pass tolerates an undecided rule by quietly picking a default, the
property is false.

D4 five kinds, each forced by an existing finding; a sixth during backfill
means the taxonomy was invented. D5 lifecycle where `applied` means the
source changed, the queue empties while the log accumulates, and
withdrawals are reported rather than deleted -- GR-E01 is why. D6 notes
admitted but never reportable, 30-day expiry on the existing age
machinery; refusing them would discard the only class of finding the
engine cannot produce itself, which is CB-WP-0025's whole input. D7 no
engine-evolution register, on an inventory C5 corrected -- narrowed, not
settled. D8 design-baseline.py retired, kept as a dated snapshot because
deleting it erases the evidence for how 33% got in. D9 the artifact stays
here, ground-game gets a generated file under its own workplan.

loop-lint: no findings. facts-check: no findings.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-08-05 15:05:51 +02:00
parent 04c3a4977f
commit 580081ef71
3 changed files with 316 additions and 2 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

35
workplans/CB-WP-0022-the-design-instrument.md
View file

@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ commit — quoted the dead number twice.
```task
id: CB-WP-0022-T03
status: todo
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "a2e85810-e949-4ea0-81fc-36b912af326c"
```
@ -250,6 +250,39 @@ state_hub_task_id: "a2e85810-e949-4ea0-81fc-36b912af326c"
as a note** — and if admitted, how it is prevented from aging into an
apparent finding.
**Done 2026-08-05.**
[ADR-0012](../decisions/ADR-0012-the-design-instrument.md), nine
decisions. The two that were not on this list are the two the review
forced:
- **D2 — `§Underdetermined` *is* the register; nothing parallel is built.**
C4's point, checked and conceded: against the survey's own five
benchmarks the incumbent already delivers four, including the Oracle
property the survey went to Magic to find and we had written down
ourselves eight days earlier (`GroundRules.md:231-233`). What it lacks
is reproductions. So the pass **extends** a section instead of building a
register — no new file, no new schema.
- **D3 — admissibility is three clauses, not one.** Exists, has the ruled
shape (row-level table, never a sum), **and can fail.** The third is
C1's: GR-E01's artifact went green when the edition landed and the
finding stayed admissible and stayed queued, because nothing said a
passing artifact was a signal. **A green reproduction is an alarm.**
The rest: **D1** INTENT gains property 4, *Instrument* — applied, with the
falsifier in the text. **D4** five kinds, each forced by an existing
finding, and a sixth appearing during backfill means the taxonomy was
invented. **D5** lifecycle with `applied` meaning *the source changed*, the
queue emptying while the log accumulates, and **withdrawals reported, not
deleted** — GR-E01 is why. **D6** notes admitted but never reportable, with
a 30-day expiry on the existing age machinery; refusing them would have
thrown away the only class of finding the engine cannot produce itself,
which is CB-WP-0025's entire input. **D7** no engine-evolution register,
on an inventory C5 corrected — argued and narrowed, not settled. **D8**
`design-baseline.py` retired, not extended; kept as a dated snapshot
because deleting it erases the evidence for how 33% got in. **D9** the
finding and its artifact stay here; ground-game gets a generated file
under its own workplan, citing the reproduction by path.
## Task: specify
```task