T03: correct stale targets in the workplan ($92.87, AC-1)

T05 still named $248.46 as its acceptance test and the Purpose total
still omitted the subagent tree. Both corrected in place, with the
error sequence recorded rather than overwritten.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-07-31 08:46:36 +02:00
parent b96cd94a64
commit 900467017f

View file

@ -39,7 +39,9 @@ repeatable acceptance target:
| Cache read | 80,453,702 | **$59.59** |
| Cache write (1h) | 1,672,854 | $21.95 |
| Input | 676 | $0.00 |
| **Total** (339 responses: 206 opus-5, 118 fable-5, 14 sonnet-5) | | **$92.21** |
| Main transcript (339 responses: 213 opus-5, 118 fable-5, 14 sonnet-5) | | $92.21 |
| Subagent tree (adversarial review, ran inside the pin) | | $0.66 |
| **TRUE TOTAL** | | **$92.87** |
The headline finding survives the correction and gets sharper:
**88.4% of the cost is cache, against 314k tokens of output — a 256:1
@ -166,10 +168,16 @@ state_hub_task_id: "bea4cc0a-e4d0-4077-9dc7-df7726a48f86"
```
Run the collector over the CB-WP-0001 session and commit
`evidence/CB-EV-0002-cost-accounting.md`. Reconciliation against the
totals in this workplan's Purpose section is the acceptance test: the
tool must reproduce $248.46 (Fable 5) from the same transcript, or
explain the difference.
`evidence/CB-EV-0002-cost-accounting.md`. The acceptance test is
`specs/CostAccounting.md` AC-1: reproduce **$92.87 pinned at `fc76445`,
as its two components** ($92.21 main transcript + $0.66 subagent tree),
plus AC-2's zero reconciliation residual.
*(Originally written as "must reproduce $248.46". That figure was wrong
by 2.7×, and the first corrected target — $92.21 — was itself reachable
only by a collector carrying the subagent blind spot the survey had just
documented. Both errors are recorded rather than quietly overwritten;
the sequence is the point.)*
Then use it to answer at least one question that could not be answered
before, and record the answer. Candidates: which of T01T09 cost most