Sync hub IDs for CB-WP-0007
Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Failing after 3s

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-08-01 13:49:47 +02:00
parent 0e394ccb3f
commit 98e09c4394
2 changed files with 14 additions and 0 deletions

View file

@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
| workplan | CB-WP-0004 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0004-mechanical-work.md |
| workplan | CB-WP-0005 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0005-assertion-coverage.md |
| workplan | CB-WP-0006 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0006-instrument-the-table.md |
| workplan | CB-WP-0007 | proposed | — | workplans/CB-WP-0007-session-shape.md |
| task | CB-WP-0001-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0001-inner-loop.md |
| task | CB-WP-0001-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0001-inner-loop.md |
| task | CB-WP-0001-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0001-inner-loop.md |
@ -64,3 +65,9 @@
| task | CB-WP-0006-T07 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0006-instrument-the-table.md |
| task | CB-WP-0006-T08 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0006-instrument-the-table.md |
| task | CB-WP-0006-T09 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0006-instrument-the-table.md |
| task | CB-WP-0007-T01 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0007-session-shape.md |
| task | CB-WP-0007-T02 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0007-session-shape.md |
| task | CB-WP-0007-T03 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0007-session-shape.md |
| task | CB-WP-0007-T04 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0007-session-shape.md |
| task | CB-WP-0007-T05 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0007-session-shape.md |
| task | CB-WP-0007-T06 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0007-session-shape.md |

View file

@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
id: CB-WP-0007
title: "Make session shape measurable in the window that matters, then enforce it"
status: proposed
state_hub_workstream_id: "bee19b76-fb60-4dcf-94d0-9242b43e0e42"
---
# Purpose
@ -40,6 +41,7 @@ currently unmet by wide margins and the temptation is obvious.
id: CB-WP-0007-T01
status: todo
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "7e036db4-d97a-45bd-a70a-20fe68225402"
```
`cb-cost`'s session-shape block reports over every response in scope. With
@ -62,6 +64,7 @@ the aggregation was not the problem and this pass should re-plan.
id: CB-WP-0007-T02
status: todo
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "1d5a32ef-4086-4021-b874-24ed2160c4dd"
```
A ceiling catches a bad pass. It does not catch a slow slide, which is how
@ -85,6 +88,7 @@ is not a trend, and the first run has nothing to compare against.
id: CB-WP-0007-T03
status: todo
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "126a6313-b1f7-462c-8771-5100d38f9429"
```
Per CB-RES-0005 D2, modelled on CB-01/CB-02, which measures spend since
@ -121,6 +125,7 @@ abort instead.
id: CB-WP-0007-T04
status: todo
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "c284db6f-2e16-40fb-be8b-83ae5391c058"
```
SH-3 is **0.0%** across two consecutive passes. The target is 20%. Nobody
@ -146,6 +151,7 @@ the pass and report the rate the instrument measures.
id: CB-WP-0007-T05
status: todo
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "2f78b272-e1f9-4530-bc8c-3a9d82833546"
```
Commit `evidence/CB-EV-0006-session-shape.md`. Four tests, all reported:
@ -168,6 +174,7 @@ Commit `evidence/CB-EV-0006-session-shape.md`. Four tests, all reported:
id: CB-WP-0007-T06
status: todo
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "93fbd2bb-403b-4be9-a5ff-d6142b916aba"
```
The question: **three passes have now found three different ways a number