CB-WP-0036 done: the pace flag and the first ornament declarations
Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Failing after 4s

--pace speed|interactive, defaulting to Speed. Nothing reads it yet, and
that is the point: it is the seam clay-animate attaches to, and a seam is
cheap now where a retrofit would not be. A misspelt pace is refused rather
than defaulting, because quietly falling back to Speed would look exactly
like the renderer being broken.

I3 is asserted rather than intended: the same scripted game at both paces
must produce a byte-identical serialised recording and the same end state
hash. Mutation-proven — leak the pace into the seed and it fails with "the
recording differs by pace, so a renderer has become mechanism".

specs/OrnamentRegister.md carries four declarations. This reverses the
reasoning written in T03 earlier, which said the first declarations would
come from F18's unvendored files: instances already existed. Hand order is
what prompted the category, and "who deals" was the maintainer's own
example. O3 is the interesting one — seat ORDER is mechanism because
GR-R08 rotates Lead, while where a seat is drawn is not.

I5 is executable: check_ornament_falsifier fails any row still declared
that names no falsifier, mutation-proven red on O1. Presence, never
adequacy, and the finding text says so.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-08-07 22:15:38 +02:00
parent b231c1b5e2
commit bd9e168af5
7 changed files with 315 additions and 9 deletions

View file

@ -306,6 +306,51 @@ def check_gate_registry(root=REPO):
return out
def check_ornament_falsifier(root=REPO):
"""Ornamentation I5 — an open declaration names what would refute it.
**A declaration is a claim that something does not matter**, and this
project's finding register is largely a list of times that claim was
wrong. One that cannot be wrong is not a claim, it is a preference
with a table row.
Presence, never adequacy -- the same split as ADR-0018 D5.
"""
out = []
reg = os.path.join(root, "specs", "OrnamentRegister.md")
if not os.path.exists(reg):
return out
with open(reg) as fh:
text = fh.read()
m = re.search(r"<!-- ornament-register:begin -->(.*?)"
r"<!-- ornament-register:end -->", text, re.S)
if not m:
return out
for line in m.group(1).splitlines():
line = line.strip()
if not line.startswith("|") or line.startswith("|---"):
continue
cells = [c.strip() for c in line.strip("|").split("|")]
if len(cells) != 5 or cells[0] == "id":
continue
oid, state = cells[0], cells[3]
# A refuted or withdrawn row is history; the rule binds a claim
# that is still being made.
if state != "declared":
continue
body = re.search(rf"^- \*\*{re.escape(oid)} [^\n]*(?:\n(?!- \*\*O\d).*)*",
text, re.M)
if not body or "Falsifier:" not in body.group(0):
out.append(Finding(
"ornament",
"specs/OrnamentRegister.md",
f"{oid} is declared ornamentation and names no falsifier "
f"(Ornamentation.md I5). Say what would make it mechanism. "
f"NOTE: this checks presence, not adequacy.",
))
return out
def check_sensitivity_stated(root=REPO):
"""GameDesign §1.4 / ADR-0018 — a finding whose claim is arithmetic
must name the variable it depends on.
@ -384,6 +429,7 @@ CHECKS = (
check_reporting_tools_self_test,
check_gate_registry,
check_sensitivity_stated,
check_ornament_falsifier,
)
@ -473,6 +519,29 @@ def self_test():
check("sensitivity: a note has no measurement to be sensitive about",
not check_sensitivity_stated(tmp), "GameDesign §3.1")
# Ornamentation I5. Same shape: it must say NO and it must say YES.
def orn(state, prose):
body = ("<!-- ornament-register:begin -->\n\n"
"| id | ornaments | grounded | state | raised |\n"
"|---|---|---|---|---|\n"
f"| O9 | a thing | provisional | {state} | 2026-01-01 |\n"
"\n<!-- ornament-register:end -->\n\n"
f"- **O9 — a thing.** {prose}\n")
with open(os.path.join(tmp, "specs", "OrnamentRegister.md"), "w") as fh:
fh.write(body)
orn("declared", "It does not matter.")
check("ornament: a declaration with no falsifier is caught",
len(check_ornament_falsifier(tmp)) == 1,
"a claim that cannot be wrong is not a claim")
orn("declared", "It does not matter. **Falsifier:** a rule naming it.")
check("ornament: naming a falsifier clears it",
not check_ornament_falsifier(tmp),
"without this it would fire on everything")
orn("refuted", "It does not matter.")
check("ornament: a refuted row is history, not a live claim",
not check_ornament_falsifier(tmp))
wp("ready", ["done", "todo"])
f = check_workplan_lifecycle(tmp)
check("lifecycle detects `ready` after work has started",