coulomb/clay-borg
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

CB-WP-0010-T01: close CB-WP-0007

Browse source 
Both remaining tasks were overtaken and are cancelled with pointers. T05's
control loop was answered by CB-EV-0008 §1 and §4, which measured the
windowed metric and the budget firing on real passes. T06 asked whether
there is a fourth way a number can fail to bind; there is, and CB-EV-0007
§3 recorded it — the meta budget, aggregated over a window that could not
move it, two tasks after the same defect was fixed for session shape. The
tier-taxonomy gap T06 also carried was closed by ADR-0006 D5.

A workplan left in_progress makes `make status` name a stale next task,
which it had been doing for two passes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-08-02 02:15:08 +02:00
parent 4b7bdaca16
commit d07caca22b
3 changed files with 29 additions and 11 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
WORK-RECORDS.md
View file

@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
| workplan | CB-WP-0007 | in_progress | — | workplans/CB-WP-0007-session-shape.md |
| workplan | CB-WP-0008 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0008-ship-stage-0.md |
| workplan | CB-WP-0009 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0009-adaptive-gates.md |
| workplan | CB-WP-0010 | proposed | — | workplans/CB-WP-0010-consolidation.md |
| task | CB-WP-0001-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0001-inner-loop.md |
| task | CB-WP-0001-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0001-inner-loop.md |
| task | CB-WP-0001-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0001-inner-loop.md |
@ -81,3 +82,6 @@
| task | CB-WP-0009-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0009-adaptive-gates.md |
| task | CB-WP-0009-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0009-adaptive-gates.md |
| task | CB-WP-0009-T04 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0009-adaptive-gates.md |
| task | CB-WP-0010-T01 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0010-consolidation.md |
| task | CB-WP-0010-T02 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0010-consolidation.md |
| task | CB-WP-0010-T03 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0010-consolidation.md |

24
workplans/CB-WP-0007-session-shape.md
View file

@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
id: CB-WP-0007
kind: meta
title: "Make session shape measurable in the window that matters, then enforce it"
status: in_progress
status: done
state_hub_workstream_id: "bee19b76-fb60-4dcf-94d0-9242b43e0e42"
---
@ -175,11 +175,18 @@ the pass and report the rate the instrument measures.
## Phase C — measure, and say what it cost
## Task: control loop — did windowing change what fires?
## Task: control loop — did windowing change what fires? (CANCELLED)
> **Cancelled 2026-08-02 (CB-WP-0010 T01), overtaken.** Both questions
> were answered with measurements two passes later:
> [CB-EV-0008](../evidence/CB-EV-0008-adaptive-gates.md) §1 compares the
> windowed metric against cumulative on real passes, and §4 records the
> shape budget firing. Writing CB-EV-0006 now would re-derive them from
> the same transcripts.
```task
id: CB-WP-0007-T05
status: todo
status: cancel
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "2f78b272-e1f9-4530-bc8c-3a9d82833546"
```
@ -201,11 +208,18 @@ Four tests, all reported:
the loop cannot detect this. Record the judgment explicitly rather than
letting the cost number imply it.
## Task: retrospective
## Task: retrospective (CANCELLED)
> **Cancelled 2026-08-02 (CB-WP-0010 T01), answered elsewhere.** The
> question was whether there is a *fourth* way a number can fail to bind.
> There is, and it is on record: CB-EV-0007 §3 found a number **aggregated
> over a window that cannot move it** — the meta budget, reintroducing the
> defect two tasks after the same one was fixed for session shape. The
> tier-taxonomy gap this task also carried was closed by ADR-0006 D5.
```task
id: CB-WP-0007-T06
status: todo
status: cancel
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "93fbd2bb-403b-4be9-a5ff-d6142b916aba"
```

12
workplans/CB-WP-0010-consolidation.md
View file

@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
id: CB-WP-0010
kind: product
title: "Close the open ends before stage 1"
status: proposed
state_hub_workstream_id: ""
status: in_progress
state_hub_workstream_id: "071a2da8-cb95-4dda-a711-7173434bdc3c"
---
# Purpose
@ -23,9 +23,9 @@ three against a soft 25%, and this pass is how it comes back down.
```task
id: CB-WP-0010-T01
status: todo
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: ""
state_hub_task_id: "88bafc24-eeac-4aa0-9c40-f15307dee120"
```
CB-WP-0007 sits at 2/6 with T05 and T06 `todo`. Both were overtaken:
@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ is what it has been doing for two passes.
id: CB-WP-0010-T02
status: todo
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: ""
state_hub_task_id: "89355b0a-9fc7-4d69-a27e-d3c94ff0730f"
```
CB-EV-0007 §1: **COMMON PROBLEM (GR-E03) is implemented, referenced by no
@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ is the first execution of that code path.
id: CB-WP-0010-T03
status: todo
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: ""
state_hub_task_id: "1da2c1de-e098-440e-8cff-7c30817d1d2b"
```
`CommitWindow` is PROVISIONAL with a delete-by of 2026-12-31, on the