diff --git a/WORK-RECORDS.md b/WORK-RECORDS.md index 87ffb48..c832170 100644 --- a/WORK-RECORDS.md +++ b/WORK-RECORDS.md @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | workplan | CB-WP-0001 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0001-inner-loop.md | | workplan | CB-WP-0002 | proposed | — | workplans/CB-WP-0002-cost-accounting.md | +| workplan | CB-WP-0003 | proposed | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md | | task | CB-WP-0001-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0001-inner-loop.md | | task | CB-WP-0001-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0001-inner-loop.md | | task | CB-WP-0001-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0001-inner-loop.md | @@ -26,3 +27,13 @@ | task | CB-WP-0002-T05 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0002-cost-accounting.md | | task | CB-WP-0002-T06 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0002-cost-accounting.md | | task | CB-WP-0002-T07 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0002-cost-accounting.md | +| task | CB-WP-0003-T01 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md | +| task | CB-WP-0003-T02 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md | +| task | CB-WP-0003-T03 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md | +| task | CB-WP-0003-T04 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md | +| task | CB-WP-0003-T05 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md | +| task | CB-WP-0003-T06 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md | +| task | CB-WP-0003-T07 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md | +| task | CB-WP-0003-T08 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md | +| task | CB-WP-0003-T09 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md | +| task | CB-WP-0003-T10 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md | diff --git a/workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md b/workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md index 65b8c1e..a7ee57c 100644 --- a/workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md +++ b/workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ id: CB-WP-0003 title: "Harden the inner loop: executable rules, session economics, dead policy" status: proposed +state_hub_workstream_id: "39d61dc0-870d-45c1-a595-bcf91f289dce" --- # Purpose @@ -36,6 +37,7 @@ deleted. id: CB-WP-0003-T01 status: todo priority: high +state_hub_task_id: "3d5d45fb-f931-407a-be71-d2d727279d5e" ``` Go through `specs/InnerLoop.md` v1.0 rule by rule and classify each: @@ -60,6 +62,7 @@ added in v1.0 are currently prose. id: CB-WP-0003-T02 status: todo priority: high +state_hub_task_id: "f861e67f-ed09-489d-963d-06697da9c08e" ``` `cargo bench -- --test` now covers benchmarks. The same error class @@ -80,6 +83,7 @@ convention nobody can verify. id: CB-WP-0003-T03 status: todo priority: medium +state_hub_task_id: "1365b35d-4539-489a-beff-c072221e4702" ``` The review step is specified for tier-L *research*. All four real errors @@ -102,6 +106,7 @@ identify what the harness would report if the work silently stopped). id: CB-WP-0003-T04 status: todo priority: high +state_hub_task_id: "382724e6-efd5-4ef8-a438-9d31a65dacdb" ``` Measured from the CB-WP-0001 session: **592 assistant turns, mean @@ -131,6 +136,7 @@ policy. id: CB-WP-0003-T05 status: todo priority: medium +state_hub_task_id: "26c920ee-2c09-4b45-a908-4d343532db09" ``` The global 8k soft / 10k hard per-task token budget was never @@ -152,6 +158,7 @@ restating it. id: CB-WP-0003-T06 status: todo priority: low +state_hub_task_id: "8f3a6147-54e8-48f9-8543-c13b0e0b0278" ``` The d10 tier roll never fired across the whole pass — roughly 0.2 @@ -170,6 +177,7 @@ to reject. id: CB-WP-0003-T07 status: todo priority: medium +state_hub_task_id: "2f702821-7e64-4981-9885-82fa07f638aa" ``` AM-4's new targets were measured at 246,250 and set at 250,000 **in the @@ -189,6 +197,7 @@ and AM-4b — either ratify them by ADR or change them. id: CB-WP-0003-T08 status: todo priority: low +state_hub_task_id: "c2ee91ee-e551-48a7-b1a9-477c34c0690c" ``` Ten U-items plus GR-E02's "successes" are marked `provisional: true` @@ -206,6 +215,7 @@ file must list them, not that the build breaks. id: CB-WP-0003-T09 status: todo priority: low +state_hub_task_id: "69ccc9ec-dc35-481c-8065-cef040f07f50" ``` `make coverage` compares rule IDs in the spec against `covers:` lists. @@ -225,6 +235,7 @@ scenario that claims it?) and cost it before adopting. id: CB-WP-0003-T10 status: todo priority: low +state_hub_task_id: "f43de208-92b1-4f0e-9236-a9d27f3ec451" ``` Revise `specs/InnerLoop.md` to v1.1 from this pass. The question to