---
id: CB-WP-0037
kind: product
title: "The fourteen unread files"
status: done
state_hub_workstream_id: "c8425c0e-51e9-445f-802c-9ff38935fd5a"
---

# Purpose

```
structural tier  M   (imports more of an external dataset under AM-4's
                      budgets, and gives an open register row its first
                      reproduction)
chaos            d8 = 1  → no override
declared tier    M
```

**Declaration 9 of chaos window 3.**

## Why this, and why now

**F18 is the only open finding clay-borg owns**, the only row in the
register lacking a reproduction, and the only metric off target
(`open, lacking a reproduction: 1, target 0`). F17 is with `ground-game`.

**And F18 is understated.** Its prose describes display data — *"the cards
cannot say what they do"* — and calls itself fixed by CB-WP-0028. Measured
now: **5 of 19 files vendored**, and among the 14 unread are

| file | what is in it |
|---|---|
| `DARVO.csv` | `mandatory_effect`, `target_memory`, `advance` — **the DARVO sequence, as rules** |
| `Relations.csv` | `formation`, `breaking`, `rules_text` — **how Bonds and Rivalries form and break** |
| `Scenarios.csv` | four scenarios with their setups — **the engine hardcodes one** |
| `Rules_Text.csv` | 21 sections of the rules themselves |
| `Player_Mats.csv` | includes `choice_rule` and `stress_track` |

**The engine implements DARVO and relation behaviour without ever having
read the edition's statement of them.** That is not inert display data; it
is rules taken from a secondary source and never checked against the
primary one.

A spot check is reassuring — REVERSE's engine path flips Focus to Blame,
gives the target +1 Stress, takes a Protection and reduces the owner's
Stress by 2, exactly as `DARVO.csv` states. **Reassuring is not checked**,
and the whole point of this repo is the difference.

## Task: give F18 a reproduction

```task
id: CB-WP-0037-T01
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "5ff5cbda-0deb-4078-a552-f5e757abb95c"
```

An artifact that measures the gap instead of asserting it: **per edition
file, columns present against columns the engine reads.**

**Controls:**
- **it can go red and green** — improving coverage must move it, or it is
  not measuring coverage (ADR-0006 D3);
- it reports **per file**, never a single ratio: *"5 of 19"* is the sum
  shape GameDesign §1.2 exists to refuse;
- **an absent upstream is reported absent, never as a pass** — the shape
  `edition-check` already uses.

**Done 2026-08-07.** `the_engine_reads_only_part_of_what_it_vendored`.
**F18 has a reproduction**, and the register's one off-target metric —
`open, lacking a reproduction: 1` — is now **0**.

**Recorded at the accessor, not counted from the source.** A list of
column names beside the code would be a second copy of a fact the `get`
calls already carry; grepping the source would over-count, because six
column names are shared between vendored files.

**And the first version was wrong in this repo's signature way.** It
watched `Table::at` only, so it reported `visibility`, `required_solution`
and `point_value` as unread when the engine reads all three —
`problems_of` predates `Table` and resolves its own indices. Correct about
the accessor, wrong about the engine: **the ADR-0018 family, committed
inside the artifact built to measure it.** Problems.csv went 7/13 → 10/13
once the manual reader was recorded too.

Measured, per file, never as a ratio:

| file | read | unread |
|---|---|---|
| Problems.csv | 10/13 | `problem_id`, `symbol_id`, `back_design_id` |
| Actions.csv | 4/9 | `symbol_id`, **`resolution_order`**, **`target`**, **`stress_restriction`**, `designer_note` |
| Solutions.csv | 4/8 | **`suit`**, `symbol_id`, **`quantity`**, `back_design_id` |
| Modes.csv | 5/7 | `mode_type`, `back_design_id` |
| Tokens.csv | 6/9 | `shape`, `size`, `symbol_id` |

**`resolution_order`, `target` and `stress_restriction` are rules**, and
the engine implements all three from `GroundRules.md` without reading the
edition's statement of them. That is T02's work.

**F24 raised**: `solution_deck()` is a Rust literal — six of each suit,
never opening `Solutions.csv`. **It agrees today** (24 rows, six per
suit), which is why it is `inert` with role `default` rather than a
counterexample: right by maintenance coincidence, not by reading.
`the_hardcoded_deck_still_matches_the_edition` is the guard until T02
deletes the literal, and it turns red the moment either side moves.

## Task: vendor what carries rules, and check it against the engine

```task
id: CB-WP-0037-T02
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "625b51fd-8af1-46bf-8b91-087760259dd6"
```

`DARVO.csv`, `Relations.csv`, `Scenarios.csv` first — they carry
mechanism.

**Controls:**
- **every divergence between the edition's text and the engine is a
  finding**, raised, not quietly fixed: the edition is `ground-game`'s to
  rule on;
- **agreement is recorded too.** A survey that finds nothing and leaves no
  trace cannot be told apart from one never run (CB-EV-0027 §3);
- AM-4's dependency and size budgets hold, or the pass says what it cost.

**Done 2026-08-08.** `DARVO.csv`, `Relations.csv` and `Scenarios.csv`
vendored with digests; `make edition-check` green both ways.

**Every checkable clause agrees.** Recorded rather than merely noted,
because a survey that finds nothing and leaves no trace cannot be told
from one never run:

| the edition says | the engine does |
|---|---|
| Bond Support: −2 Stress, ready Freedom, **cancel the target's DARVO stage** | −2, `FreedomReadied`, `DarvoEnded` |
| Bond Attack: +2 and **flip** to Rivalry | +2, `RelationFormed(Rivalry)` |
| Rivalry Support: −1, **target chooses** flip or break | −1, `FlipToBond` / `BreakRivalry` |
| Rivalry Attack: +2 and **break** | +2, `RelationBroken` |
| no-relation Attack forms a Rivalry **automatically** | forms without consent, both slots free |
| DARVO ATTACK places Focus **even if the Attack was cancelled** | `FocusPlaced` after `resolve_attack` regardless |
| **remove Focus if the sequence ends before REVERSE** | `focus.remove` on `DarvoEnded` |
| REVERSE: flip to Blame, +1 to target, take a Protection, −2 to self | exactly that, with GROUND—ND rejection |

**The two hardest clauses to notice were already right**, which is the
part worth saying: nobody had read the file, and they were right anyway.

**These are tripwires, not derivations.** The match was made by a person
reading prose, and that reading goes stale in silence when the prose
changes. Each behaviour pins the phrase it was read from, so a reworded
edition turns the test red and asks for a human — mutation-proven by
rewording *"even if the Attack was cancelled"*, which fails naming the
exact engine branch that depends on it.

**F25 raised, and it is the real yield.** `Scenarios.csv` carries
`threshold_2_players/3_4/5_6`, `starting_stress` and `round_track` — and
the engine **hardcodes all three**: a `match` returning 5/7/9, `stress: 2`
at setup, five rounds. They agree on all four scenarios. **These are the
most contested numbers in the project** — the entire 4/6/9 versus 5/7/9
episode turned on them — and the engine has been right about them by
maintenance coincidence rather than by reading the file that owns them.
Same shape as F24; `inert`, role `default`.

**A second pair that could drift silently**: `Problems.csv` and
`Scenarios.csv` both state the deal, and the engine reads only the first.
`the_two_files_that_state_the_deal_agree` checks all four scenarios; they
match today, and nothing was checking.

**Coverage, re-measured** — the earlier figure would otherwise have
understated the gap by three files: `DARVO.csv` 5/6, `Relations.csv` 4/6,
`Scenarios.csv` 4/13.

## Task: classify the rest

```task
id: CB-WP-0037-T03
status: done
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "a09c8738-f38f-414a-a986-ba224396903e"
```

`Symbols`, `Design_Tokens`, `Back_Designs`, `BOM`, `Print_Manifest` are
production and visual identity.

**Control:** each becomes either a vendored file or an **ornament
declaration with a falsifier** ([`OrnamentRegister.md`](../specs/OrnamentRegister.md)).
**O4 already says nothing may be declared about `Player_Mats` or
`Glossary` until they are read** — so read them or leave O4 alone.

**Done 2026-08-08.** Read them, and **O4 was wrong**: `Player_Mats.csv`
carries GR-R03 in `choice_rule`. Both files are vendored as mechanism, the
stress gate has a tripwire, and O4 is rewritten and re-grounded from
`provisional` to `rule`.

**O5, O6, O7 declared** with falsifiers — symbols and glyphs, colours and
design tokens, card backs / BOM / print manifest. O7's falsifier is not
theoretical: `back_design_id` is unread in four vendored files and hidden
information is what card backs are *for*.

**`Ornamentation.md` §1.3 added**: the unit is a column, not a file.
Discovered by doing the work rather than predicted by the plan.

## Task: evidence

```task
id: CB-WP-0037-T04
status: done
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "e15a9ada-263a-4fce-8975-b5d88b9ac08a"
```

`evidence/CB-EV-*.md`. **Did the engine's rules match the edition's?**
Say so either way, per rule, not as a count.

**Done 2026-08-08.**
[CB-EV-0029](../evidence/CB-EV-0029-the-fourteen-unread-files.md).
**Yes, every checkable clause** — stated per rule, and with the reading
that result does *not* support said out loud: it shows `GroundRules.md`
was a faithful secondary source for the clauses that have behaviour to
check, not that the engine is correct.