---
id: CB-WP-0050
kind: product
title: "Every configuration, faceted by aspect"
status: done
---

# Purpose

```
structural tier  S   (a new panel; no rule, no state, no artifact
                      contract moved)
declared tier    S
```

CB-RES-0010 §5.4: *"hold all aspects fixed, vary one."* The selector
(CB-WP-0048) made configurations selectable and the policies (CB-WP-0049)
made them judgeable. This measures them.

## Task: sweep the points, and say what could not be measured

```task
id: CB-WP-0050-T01
status: done
priority: high
```

**Controls:**
- **one module at a time first**, every other aspect held at its default,
  so a row measures a module rather than a bundle;
- **profiles after**, where an interaction is the hypothesis — and a
  single-module profile is skipped, because it is the row above;
- **nothing is omitted**: a module with no kernel path prints as such;
- **a module that never acted is reported UNMEASURED**, by name.

**Done 2026-08-08.** `make panels` gained `module-panel`.

## What it found

**1. `attack_relief.self_soothe_ge4` has never fired. Not once.**

Zero ATTACKs in every cell, at every seat band, under both bots. The
module acts only on an uncancelled ATTACK by a seat at Stress ≥ 4, and
`GreedyPolicy` ranks `Ground` at 100 when the gate bites against
`Attack`'s 10 — so at exactly the position where self-soothe would pay,
GROUND wins. `ModuleAwarePolicy` adds 55 and **that is still not
enough**.

Filed as **F31, `unplayed`**. This also reaches backwards:
**CB-EV-0030's H1 verdict rests on its flat-pressure half alone**, since
H1's other half never had an opportunity in any of those games either.

**2. `problem_stress.scoped` is the only module with a measured effect.**
3p group success 85 → 60 (greedy) and 86 → 63 (module-aware); peak Stress
2 → 4. `problem_stress.flat_any_open` drives group success to **0** at
every seat band, which is the H1 rejection reproduced from the module
side rather than the package side.

**3. `scoped_plus_attack_soothe` is exactly `problem_stress.scoped`.**
Identical in every cell — necessarily, given (1). The first intentional
multi-aspect combination in the catalog **cannot currently be evaluated
as a combination**, and the panel says so on its own row rather than
letting the equality read as "no interaction".

## The defect the panel had, on its first run

It printed `85 / 86` for `attack_relief.self_soothe_ge4` — real-looking
numbers that invite the reading *"measured, no effect"*, when the truth
is that no seat ever created the precondition. **Its own docstring said
it would not do this**, which is the same shape as CB-WP-0046's wrong
reason for an open item: the claim was written before the behaviour was.

Two iterations to get the reporting honest:

- first, whole rows marked `never fired — unmeasured` — which **threw away
  a real result**, because `h1`'s flat-pressure half fires in every game
  and drives group success to 0;
- then, the **specific module** named, with the row's numbers kept:
  `0  0  4  0  0  ← attack_relief.self_soothe_ge4 never fired: UNMEASURED`.

The numbers in such a row are real for the modules that did fire. Saying
which one did not is what stops the row being read as a verdict on all of
them.

## Not done here

- **The panel measures SHARED GROUND only.** Mode × module is a
  three-dimensional sweep and nothing yet says the modules behave the
  same under the competitive modes — where, per CB-EV-0033, *who wins*
  moves even when group success does not.
- **F31 has no falsifier running.** A seat that attacks at the gate would
  settle whether `attack_relief.self_soothe_ge4` is real or merely
  unreachable; until one exists, no claim about that module is supported
  in either direction.
- **The scope term is inert at round-one positions** (CB-WP-0049 T04), so
  `problem_stress.scoped`'s measured effect is driven by later rounds.
  The panel does not report per-round effect, and that is where the
  module actually lives.