tegwick
4a72420e01
Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Failing after 4s
GateAttackPolicy ranks ATTACK above GROUND at the stress gate and delegates everything else. A PROBE, not a better bot: it wins 12/100 where greedy wins 60/100 under the same module, and the panel's banner says so, because a column that looks like a policy comparison will be read as one. (a) THE MODULE IS UNREACHABLE IN THE PRINTED GAME. Selected alone it still never fires: peak Stress never exceeds 2, so the gate never bites and no ATTACK is ever gated. A module can be unreachable because of an aspect it does not name -- attack_relief needs a problem_stress module before it can act at all, and nothing in its own declaration says so. (b) ONCE REACHABLE IT IS REAL. Holding the probe fixed and varying only the module: group wins 12->21, 19->28, 50->57 at 3/4/6p, and DARVO arms 299->221, 294->213, 334->164. Under flat pressure the same shape appears in DARVO alone: h1 arms 200 against flat_any_open's 300/400/600. Stated as the conditional it is: GIVEN seats that attack at the gate. Not advice to attack, and not evidence against F17. AND IT CHANGES WHAT WE TOLD GROUND-GAME. CB-EV-0030 rejected H1 with policies that never attacked, so H1-B was inert for every game behind that verdict. The rejection stands on flat pressure alone -- wins are 0 either way -- but "H1-B does nothing" was never established and is now known to be false. We owe them that correction. Sensitivity: vary only the ATTACK rank. At 10 (greedy) and +55 (module-aware) the module never fires; at 110 it fires in every game. Nothing about the module changed -- only whether any seat gave it a turn. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| benches | ||
| examples | ||
| src | ||
| Cargo.toml | ||