tegwick
704b99975b
Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Failing after 4s
vendor tool that covers what the gate checks
They ruled on all seven items the same day. Two were actionable here.
F28 RULED: points. Modes.csv MODE_COOP clarified upstream to say
"penalties apply to points, not card count"; mastery is now
total - blame - denied. A recorded scenario went red on it --
gr-e02-shared-ground pinned 0 (2 claimed CARDS - 1 - 1) and now expects
2 (4 POINTS - 1 - 1). The number moved because the rule was decided, not
because the engine drifted, and the scenario records both rulings; its
schema has no field for a second one, so both live in ruled_note with
`ruled` carrying the LATEST date.
F29 RULED not-intended and APPLIED upstream: SCN_02's suits re-tuned the
same day. The characterisation test is how we found out -- it pinned the
duplication, went red on the re-tune, and that red WAS the notification.
It now asserts every pair distinct, the stronger statement the
duplication had made unavailable. SCN_02 re-measures at 73 at 2p, not
67: its own board now.
F26/F30 ruled and recorded. F30's ruling incidentally confirms our
reading -- they name priority-2's suit as the first lever, which is the
difference we identified without having measured causation.
vendor-editions grew twice, both times because it covered less than the
gate it exists to satisfy:
- It refused to touch ground-darvo-r0/ on the reasoning that the
baseline is "a separate record". That was wrong within the hour:
ground-game clarified Modes.csv and `make vendor` reported a clean
sync while edition-check went red. A sync tool that covers less than
its check reports success into a red gate.
- Its two-block rewrite DETECTED which fence held which set and
preserved the arrangement -- faithfully preserving a swap an earlier
write had introduced, leaving each fence under a heading describing
the other. edition-check reads every sha256 line flat and passed
throughout: a document can be self-consistently wrong and green.
Order is now asserted, with a control that goes red on a swap.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
61 lines
2.2 KiB
YAML
61 lines
2.2 KiB
YAML
scenario: ground/gr-e02-shared-ground
|
||
description: >
|
||
SHARED GROUND scoring after Round 5 (GR-R09, GR-E01, GR-E02): one
|
||
shared total against the player-count threshold, with a Mastery
|
||
rating reduced by each Blame token and each Denied Problem.
|
||
covers: [GR-R09, GR-E01, GR-E02, GR-P03]
|
||
ruled: 2026-08-08
|
||
ruled_by: ground-game
|
||
ruled_note: >
|
||
GROUND-WP-0002 T03, 2026-08-03 — confirm: encode Modes.csv MODE_COOP as printed. Encodes no U-item; it was provisional on the mode data, not on an undetermined rule.
|
||
RE-RULED 2026-08-08 (F28 / GROUND-RPT-0006 §5(a)): mastery penalties apply to POINTS, not card count. Modes.csv MODE_COOP was clarified upstream and this scenario's expectation moved from 0 to 2. The schema has no field for a second ruling, so both are recorded here; the `ruled` date is the LATEST, because that is the one a reader must check the edition against.
|
||
seed: 42
|
||
setup:
|
||
players: 3
|
||
preset: standard-3p
|
||
patch:
|
||
"lead": 0
|
||
"round": 5
|
||
"mode": SharedGround
|
||
# 3p threshold is 7; claimed values 1+3 fall short.
|
||
"problems.1.claimed_by": 0
|
||
"problems.3.claimed_by": 1
|
||
"problems.2.denied": true
|
||
"players.2.blame_from": [0]
|
||
commands:
|
||
- actor: P1
|
||
cmd: select_action
|
||
args: { action: INVESTIGATE, problem: 2 }
|
||
- actor: P2
|
||
cmd: select_action
|
||
args: { action: INVESTIGATE, problem: 2 }
|
||
- actor: P3
|
||
cmd: select_action
|
||
args: { action: INVESTIGATE, problem: 2 }
|
||
- actor: SYSTEM
|
||
cmd: reveal
|
||
- actor: SYSTEM
|
||
cmd: resolve
|
||
- actor: SYSTEM
|
||
cmd: end_round
|
||
expect:
|
||
events:
|
||
- kind: GameEnded
|
||
state:
|
||
"outcome.total": 4
|
||
"outcome.threshold": 7
|
||
"outcome.group_success": false
|
||
# POINTS, not card count (F28, ruled by ground-game 2026-08-08):
|
||
# start from the shared point total (4), −1 point per Blame token,
|
||
# −1 point per Denied Problem.
|
||
#
|
||
# **This scenario asserted 0** — 2 claimed CARDS − 1 − 1 — which is
|
||
# the reading the clarified Modes.csv now rules out. The number moved
|
||
# because the rule was decided, not because the engine drifted, and
|
||
# the gate went red on exactly this line.
|
||
"outcome.mastery": 2
|
||
"outcome.winners": []
|
||
# GR-R09: the game ended rather than advancing to Round 6.
|
||
"round": 5
|
||
"step": End
|
||
rejects: []
|