Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Failing after 3s
CB-EV-0030 concluded H1's DARVO arm rate was still 0. That was true of the panel, and the panel was greedy-family throughout. GreedyPolicy ranks `Ground if gated => 100`, so it grounds the instant the stress gate bites, Stress plateaus at 3, and the arm at 5 is unreachable by construction. "H1 does nothing" was really "H1 does nothing to a seat that already manages its Stress" — and H1 was written for the seat that does not. `reactive` is greedy with exactly one preference changed: GROUND demoted below ATTACK. Under it, H1's criteria 1 and 2 are MET — DARVO arms 400 times per cell, ATTACK is chosen 3 times per seat per game. Criterion 3 fails harder: reactive wins nothing at any seat count. The larger finding is about the baseline. Greedy and reactive play IDENTICALLY under baseline, and peak Stress across 3,200 baseline games was 1 — against a starting value of 2. The gate at 4, the DARVO arm at 5 and the Freedom token are all unreachable, and a policy built to be reckless with Stress is indistinguishable from one built to husband it. That is a deeper account of F17 than F17 has. Not raised as a finding yet: it wants the plural panel first. A constant was investigated rather than reported: darvo was exactly 400 in every cell while atk scaled with seats. Six-player final Stress is [5,5,4,4,4,4] every seed — H1-B holds the attacker at 4, below the arm, and pushes its targets to 5. The self-soothe suppresses DARVO in the aggressor and concentrates it in the attacked. The direction follows from H1-B's arithmetic; the number 2 is partly an artifact of reactive's first-legal targeting, and is labelled as such. Still unreviewed: tier L review outstanding on CB-WP-0038, and nothing here reaches ground-game until it runs. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
186 lines
6.3 KiB
Rust
186 lines
6.3 KiB
Rust
//! Does H1 do nothing, or does it do nothing **to a seat that already
|
|
//! manages its Stress**? (CB-WP-0039)
|
|
//!
|
|
//! [`CB-EV-0030`] measured ground-game's H1 with a panel that was
|
|
//! greedy-family throughout, and found DARVO never arms. But
|
|
//! `GreedyPolicy` ranks `Action::Ground if gated => 100`: the moment the
|
|
//! stress gate bites it grounds, Stress plateaus at 3, and the arm at 5
|
|
//! is unreachable **by construction**.
|
|
//!
|
|
//! H1 was written for the seat that does *not* do that. So this varies
|
|
//! **exactly one preference** — GROUND demoted below ATTACK — and holds
|
|
//! every other ranking identical to greedy's.
|
|
//!
|
|
//! [`CB-EV-0030`]: ../../../evidence/CB-EV-0030-h1-measured.md
|
|
|
|
use cb_game_runtime::{ScenarioGame, Setup};
|
|
use cb_kernel::PlayerId;
|
|
use games_ground::bot::{play, Choice, GreedyPolicy, Policy};
|
|
use games_ground::{Action, GroundCommand, GroundState, ScoringMode, Variant};
|
|
|
|
/// Greedy, with GROUND demoted below ATTACK. Nothing else differs.
|
|
///
|
|
/// **The copy is deliberate.** `GreedyPolicy::rank` is private, and the
|
|
/// point is to change one line of it while holding the rest identical —
|
|
/// calling into it would make that impossible to demonstrate.
|
|
struct Reactive;
|
|
|
|
impl Policy for Reactive {
|
|
fn name(&self) -> &'static str {
|
|
"reactive"
|
|
}
|
|
fn choose(
|
|
&mut self,
|
|
state: &GroundState,
|
|
seat: PlayerId,
|
|
legal: &[GroundCommand],
|
|
_may_pass: bool,
|
|
) -> Choice {
|
|
let gated = state
|
|
.players
|
|
.get(&seat)
|
|
.is_some_and(|p| p.stress >= 4 && !p.freedom_gate_lifted);
|
|
let rank = |c: &GroundCommand| -> i32 {
|
|
match c {
|
|
GroundCommand::SelectAction {
|
|
action, problem, ..
|
|
} => match action {
|
|
// THE ONE LINE. Greedy has `Ground if gated => 100`.
|
|
Action::Ground if gated => 5,
|
|
Action::Solve
|
|
if problem
|
|
.and_then(|p| state.problems.get(&p))
|
|
.is_some_and(|p| p.claimed_by.is_some()) =>
|
|
{
|
|
20
|
|
}
|
|
Action::Solve => 90,
|
|
Action::Investigate => 80,
|
|
Action::Support => 70,
|
|
Action::Ground => 5,
|
|
Action::Attack => 10,
|
|
},
|
|
GroundCommand::SpendFreedom => 95,
|
|
GroundCommand::ChooseGroundMode { .. } => 50,
|
|
GroundCommand::RespondToSupport { .. } => 90,
|
|
GroundCommand::ChooseDarvoTarget { .. } => 50,
|
|
GroundCommand::Reveal | GroundCommand::Resolve | GroundCommand::EndRound => -1,
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
let mut best = 0;
|
|
for (i, c) in legal.iter().enumerate() {
|
|
if rank(c) > rank(&legal[best]) {
|
|
best = i;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
Choice::Command(best)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
struct Cell {
|
|
games: u32,
|
|
won: u32,
|
|
atk: u32,
|
|
darvo: u32,
|
|
peak_stress: u8,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fn sweep(mode: ScoringMode, variant: Variant, players: u8, reactive: bool) -> Cell {
|
|
let mut c = Cell {
|
|
games: 0,
|
|
won: 0,
|
|
atk: 0,
|
|
darvo: 0,
|
|
peak_stress: 0,
|
|
};
|
|
for seed in 0..200u64 {
|
|
let Ok(mut st) = GroundState::setup(
|
|
&Setup {
|
|
players,
|
|
preset: format!("standard-{players}p"),
|
|
patch: Default::default(),
|
|
},
|
|
seed,
|
|
) else {
|
|
continue;
|
|
};
|
|
st.mode = mode;
|
|
st.variant = variant;
|
|
let mut ps: Vec<Box<dyn Policy>> = (0..players)
|
|
.map(|_| {
|
|
if reactive {
|
|
Box::new(Reactive) as Box<dyn Policy>
|
|
} else {
|
|
Box::new(GreedyPolicy) as Box<dyn Policy>
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
.collect();
|
|
// A refused game is not a lost game (CB-EV-0030 §3).
|
|
let g = match play(st, &mut ps) {
|
|
Ok(g) => g,
|
|
Err(e) => {
|
|
eprintln!(" !! {players}p seed {seed}: {e:?}");
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
c.games += 1;
|
|
if g.state.outcome.as_ref().is_some_and(|o| o.group_success) {
|
|
c.won += 1;
|
|
}
|
|
for (_, cmd) in &g.steps {
|
|
if let GroundCommand::SelectAction {
|
|
action: Action::Attack,
|
|
..
|
|
} = cmd
|
|
{
|
|
c.atk += 1;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
for e in &g.events {
|
|
if matches!(e, games_ground::GroundEvent::DarvoTriggered { .. }) {
|
|
c.darvo += 1;
|
|
}
|
|
// How close does Stress actually get to the arm at 5? That is
|
|
// the number H1's whole mechanism turns on, and CB-EV-0030
|
|
// had to infer it from a single game.
|
|
if let games_ground::GroundEvent::StressSet { stress, .. } = e {
|
|
c.peak_stress = c.peak_stress.max(*stress);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
c
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fn main() {
|
|
println!("CB-WP-0039 — does H1 reach a seat that does not regulate?\n");
|
|
println!("`reactive` is greedy with ONE preference changed: GROUND is");
|
|
println!("demoted below ATTACK, so the seat never grounds to shed Stress.");
|
|
println!("SHARED GROUND; `won` is group success; 200 games per cell.\n");
|
|
|
|
for (vlabel, variant) in [
|
|
("BASELINE ground-darvo-r0", Variant::Baseline),
|
|
("H1 h1-problem-stress", Variant::H1ProblemStress),
|
|
] {
|
|
println!("{vlabel}");
|
|
println!(" greedy (regulates) reactive (does not)");
|
|
println!("seats games won atk darvo peak games won atk darvo peak");
|
|
for players in [2u8, 3, 4, 6] {
|
|
let g = sweep(ScoringMode::SharedGround, variant, players, false);
|
|
let r = sweep(ScoringMode::SharedGround, variant, players, true);
|
|
println!(
|
|
" {players}p {:>4} {:>4} {:>4} {:>5} {:>4} {:>4} {:>4} {:>4} {:>5} {:>4}",
|
|
g.games,
|
|
g.won,
|
|
g.atk,
|
|
g.darvo,
|
|
g.peak_stress,
|
|
r.games,
|
|
r.won,
|
|
r.atk,
|
|
r.darvo,
|
|
r.peak_stress
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
println!();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|