clay-borg/evidence
tegwick c4a8a227c0
Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Failing after 3s
CB-REV-0003: round 3, and three of four FATAL came from round 2's fixes
The pattern is now measured over three rounds: 5 fatal, then 3 (2 from the
previous round's corrections), then 4 (3 from them). The corrections are
not getting safer.

FATAL 1: round 2's short-cell assertion went into regulation.rs only.
attack-value.rs — which produced every number in CB-EV-0030's DARVO table
— still just warned, and the gate registered to close the finding claimed
the property for both.

FATAL 2, the sharpest of the three rounds: counting games proves they
STARTED. Stopping the engine after one round gives 200 games, all-zero
columns and exit 0 — byte for byte the signature CB-EV-0030 says the
instrumentation distinguishes from a real result. Both harnesses now
require every counted game to have reached an outcome over five rounds.

FATAL 3: round 2's `.csv` filter was applied to all three loops, so
catalog.yaml and rules_delta.yaml — whose missing digests were round 1's
finding — were recorded and then never compared, and never checked against
upstream at all. Only the parser loop filters now.

FATAL 4: five of six tiebreak comparators had no coverage. GR-E04's
tiebreak never executes in any scenario. All four are now covered and
mutation-verified; the Blame key needed compensating claims to be
reachable at all, since Blame also lowers the coalition score.

SERIOUS: "peak held" computed the same number as "peak assigned" for every
possible input — the real gap was that START_STRESS was an unchecked
constant, now read off the dealt state; cadence="none" was a pure
loophole, removed; sibling discovery swapped a hand-written list for
hand-written globs and missed metadata.json and VARIANT.md, both named in
the package's own changed_files — now walked, and it found them
immediately; and "~72,000 games" was unsourced, make panels runs 17,600.

Also separated two kinds of number that were presented alike: seats×games
is invariant, 363 and 29 vary 7.1%-11.5% across samples.

Round 4 owed. The conclusion is not that the work is nearly right — it is
that author-made corrections to measurement work should be assumed
defective until a fresh reader has attacked them.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-08 10:26:25 +02:00
..
CB-EV-0001-game-kernel.md CB-WP-0019 T01/T02: AM-4b asks what a contributor acquires 2026-08-03 19:04:54 +02:00
CB-EV-0002-cost-accounting.md CB-WP-0004 T04: fact registry and make facts-check — DFD gets a gate 2026-07-31 10:24:39 +02:00
CB-EV-0003-mechanical-work.md CB-WP-0004 T05: control loop — 6 points recovered, not 25-30 2026-07-31 10:27:09 +02:00
CB-EV-0004-assertion-coverage.md CB-WP-0005 T07/T08: control loop, retrospective, InnerLoop v1.4 2026-07-31 18:05:31 +02:00
CB-EV-0005-instrument-the-table.md CB-WP-0006 T08: control loop — 4 of 14 to 8 of 14, and a cost regression 2026-08-01 13:39:12 +02:00
CB-EV-0007-stage-0.md CB-WP-0008-T04: CB-EV-0007 — stage 0 is shipped, and the spend curve is a V 2026-08-01 15:25:19 +02:00
CB-EV-0008-adaptive-gates.md CB-WP-0009-T04: CB-EV-0008 — the gate changes, measured 2026-08-01 15:45:08 +02:00
CB-EV-0009-inspectable-table.md CB-WP-0011-T03: evidence — the chaos roll fired, and it was right 2026-08-02 02:48:51 +02:00
CB-EV-0010-render-port.md CB-WP-0012-T05: evidence — tier L deleted its own deliverable 2026-08-02 04:30:10 +02:00
CB-EV-0011-instrument-corrections.md CB-WP-0013-T04: evidence — and a rule about quoting your own cost 2026-08-02 07:32:07 +02:00
CB-EV-0012-execute-the-javascript.md CB-WP-0014-T03: hot-seat evidenced; stage 1 open on one human check 2026-08-02 07:58:59 +02:00
CB-EV-0013-the-inert-clauses.md CB-EV-0013: correct the cost table, and the self-quoting rule with it 2026-08-02 14:09:52 +02:00
CB-EV-0014-the-drop-target.md CB-WP-0017: legible interaction, and the chaos window's verdict 2026-08-02 22:42:45 +02:00
CB-EV-0015-legible-interaction.md CB-WP-0017: legible interaction, and the chaos window's verdict 2026-08-02 22:42:45 +02:00
CB-EV-0016-the-browser-is-a-client.md CB-WP-0018 T03/T04: explanations, and window 1's verdict 2026-08-03 02:24:13 +02:00
CB-EV-0017-budgets.md CB-WP-0019 T03/T04: the cost rule written down, and the lifecycle 2026-08-03 19:25:18 +02:00
CB-EV-0018-the-table-you-can-read.md CB-WP-0021: correct the declaration before writing any code 2026-08-03 20:35:39 +02:00
CB-EV-0019-import-the-edition.md CB-WP-0021 T04: evidence -- the endings are tight, and the cost chain snapped 2026-08-05 15:56:31 +02:00
CB-EV-0020-solve-legality.md CB-EV-0020: a gate moved the rule, and the report was wrong 2026-08-04 00:21:21 +02:00
CB-EV-0021-the-design-instrument.md CB-WP-0022 T05/T06/T07: the register, and what its first run found 2026-08-05 15:22:33 +02:00
CB-EV-0022-collect-the-rulings.md CB-WP-0026: collect the rulings -- ten answers that arrived and were never applied 2026-08-05 16:13:37 +02:00
CB-EV-0023-the-table-you-can-watch.md CB-WP-0024: the table you can watch 2026-08-05 17:32:48 +02:00
CB-EV-0024-could-we-have-won.md ADR-0017: window 2's verdict — the mechanism worked, my account of it did 2026-08-07 10:55:54 +02:00
CB-EV-0025-the-commentary-track.md ADR-0017: window 2's verdict — the mechanism worked, my account of it did 2026-08-07 10:55:54 +02:00
CB-EV-0026-the-table-you-sit-at.md ADR-0017: window 2's verdict — the mechanism worked, my account of it did 2026-08-07 10:55:54 +02:00
CB-EV-0027-the-tokens-on-the-table.md ADR-0017: window 2's verdict — the mechanism worked, my account of it did 2026-08-07 10:55:54 +02:00
CB-EV-0028-a-number-that-does-not-move.md CB-WP-0030: a control for the wrong-subject family 2026-08-07 11:35:41 +02:00
CB-EV-0029-the-fourteen-unread-files.md CB-WP-0037 done: T03 classification and T04 evidence 2026-08-08 00:33:24 +02:00
CB-EV-0030-h1-measured.md CB-REV-0002: round 2, and the corrections were not approvable either 2026-08-08 09:44:00 +02:00
CB-EV-0031-a-seat-that-does-not-regulate.md CB-REV-0003: round 3, and three of four FATAL came from round 2's fixes 2026-08-08 10:26:25 +02:00