clay-borg/tools
tegwick 69c1658d20
Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Has been cancelled
CB-WP-0019 T03/T04: the cost rule written down, and the lifecycle
T03: InnerLoop v1.7 plus loop-lint's own-cost check. Six passes
under-reported themselves by 30-45%, never once high, and the rule lived
only in evidence files having been re-derived three times. The READING
is load bearing, not the boundary: CB-WP-0018 T04 applied 're-run the
instrument at the moment of quoting' alone and its figure was correct.
So the operative instruction is re-run when you quote, and loop-lint
fails an evidence file naming its own workplan beside a dollar amount
without marking it provisional.

It binds forward from this pass. The check fires on seven historical
files which ARE the evidence for the rule; making them comply would edit
the record to remove the thing it proves -- the same category error as a
live fact: tag on a dated measurement, which this pass also hit.

Lifecycle, at the maintainer's instruction: ready -> active -> done,
where ready means declared and not started. loop-lint fails a workplan
that has started and still says ready, one that is active with
everything closed, and one that is done with an open task. The first
version of that check was WRONG and its own self-test caught it: it
stripped the leading status: assuming frontmatter, which silently
dropped a real task once the frontmatter said ready or active.

Both new checks then fired on this pass's own artifacts and both were
right to.

T04: CB-EV-0017. The new meta budget's first reading is a breach it
caused -- 27% against the 20% line, because this pass cost $31.18
against product passes averaging ~$21. Reported rather than exempted:
ADR-0006 D2 covers the instrument repairs but not the rule-writing, and
the honest reading is that this should have been two passes.

CB-WP-0018 settled at $36.53/95 against $28.08/82 last reported, 30%
higher. Seven for seven.

make all exits 0.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-03 19:25:18 +02:00
..
cb-play CB-WP-0018 T03/T04: explanations, and window 1's verdict 2026-08-03 02:24:13 +02:00
cb-sim CB-WP-0015: the two inert clauses, AM-7 scaling and AM-8 N=10 2026-08-02 14:07:08 +02:00
cb-cost.py CB-WP-0013-T02/T03: retire SH-3 as a gate; correct AM-4a and its target 2026-08-02 07:30:14 +02:00
dep-weight.py CB-WP-0019 T01/T02: AM-4b asks what a contributor acquires 2026-08-03 19:04:54 +02:00
facts.py CB-WP-0006 T07: implement K18, amend K14 2026-08-01 12:47:16 +02:00
gate-review.py CB-WP-0009-T02: gates.toml and make gate-review 2026-08-01 15:42:13 +02:00
loop-lint.py CB-WP-0019 T03/T04: the cost rule written down, and the lifecycle 2026-08-03 19:25:18 +02:00
mutation-check.py CB-WP-0019 T01/T02: AM-4b asks what a contributor acquires 2026-08-03 19:04:54 +02:00
replay-test.py CB-WP-0006 T06: K10 replay bundles, --replay, and AM-7 re-earned 2026-08-01 11:05:37 +02:00
repo.py CB-WP-0004 T01: fix environment friction at the root 2026-07-31 10:13:52 +02:00
rule-coverage.py CB-WP-0006 T07: implement K18, amend K14 2026-08-01 12:47:16 +02:00
runtime-metrics.py Fix the AM-5 instrument to measure quietly; the breach was not real 2026-08-01 10:37:25 +02:00
size-metrics.py CB-WP-0006 T02: instrument AM-2; report AM-3 blocked, with the argument 2026-07-31 18:38:15 +02:00
status.py status: a cancelled task is a closed one 2026-08-03 18:55:11 +02:00
task-done.py chore: mark T01/T02 done (measured: $2.33 + $1.68, 46 responses, opus-5) 2026-07-31 10:18:34 +02:00