|
Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Failing after 4s
CB-EV-0012. Stage 1, deliverable by deliverable: relationship-graph visualization emitted and gated, NEVER SEEN drag-to-propose evidenced end to end debug inspector evidenced (CB-WP-0011) hot-seat play evidenced here Hot-seat was the one closest to being claimed on the strength of the code path existing. SeatPolicy hands every human seat a handle on one shared Server, so turn-taking "obviously" worked — and nothing drove more than one seat until now. The property that matters is not that two turns happen but that the same tab, asked twice, shows two different hands. Mutating the projection to serve P1's view to every seat turns it red. The stage stays open on ONE named blocker rather than a vague reservation: no browser is available to this loop, so the visualization is evidenced only as correctly emitted. Everything testable from here has been tested. What remains is `cb-play --serve 0`, open the URL, confirm the table reads and a drag works. INTENT carries that note now. The self-quoting rule from CB-EV-0011 §4 is ADOPTED: an evidence file quotes the previous pass's final cost and never its own. CB-WP-0013 reported itself at $5.78/34 mid-flight; final is $8.26/47, under by 43%. Four for four, always low. Meta budget 29% [OVER] soft 25%, driven by CB-WP-0013 in a trailing three with two cheap product passes; it was an instrument repair, which ADR-0006 D2 exempts. SH-1 at 347,720 [HARD] against a 300,000 ceiling. Compaction is the remedy and this session cannot do it for itself. CB-EV-0009's standing prediction is now live and testable for the first time in three passes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| cb-play | ||
| cb-sim | ||
| cb-cost.py | ||
| dep-weight.py | ||
| facts.py | ||
| gate-review.py | ||
| loop-lint.py | ||
| mutation-check.py | ||
| replay-test.py | ||
| repo.py | ||
| rule-coverage.py | ||
| runtime-metrics.py | ||
| size-metrics.py | ||
| status.py | ||
| task-done.py | ||