|
Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Failing after 4s
CB-EV-0011. Three instruments were wrong; the pass found the third defect itself and committed the fourth. The rule this pass should leave behind: an evidence file quotes the PREVIOUS pass's final cost, not its own. Three for three, all low by a strikingly consistent ~2/3: CB-WP-0009 $6.73 reported -> $11.31 final CB-WP-0011 $4.23 reported -> $7.02 final CB-WP-0012 $8.82 reported -> $14.52 final And this time it changed a conclusion. CB-EV-0010 reported the first priced tier comparison as "0.123 at L against 0.099 at S — 24% more". The final figures are 0.150 against 0.099 — 51% more. Tier L costs twice what that comparison claimed. It still deleted a port that would have been rewritten and found errors of 25x and 85x, so it still looks worth it, but the price doubled and the file that made the argument could not have known. Also closed rather than deferred again: cb-play's "third mode" never arrived. --serve is a play flag selecting which Policy fills a human seat; the binary still has two modes, and CB-EV-0010 §6 was wrong. Carried for two passes, resolved, stopped. Recorded as a near-miss: an instrument reading that looked impossible (53 tool calls in 53 responses) turned out to be correct. One independent re-derivation before writing anything stopped a false accusation — in the pass whose whole subject is instruments reporting things that are not so. gate-review: 0 due, 0 silent, 0 drifted. Every gate in the registry has a caught entry for the first time. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| CB-EV-0001-game-kernel.md | ||
| CB-EV-0002-cost-accounting.md | ||
| CB-EV-0003-mechanical-work.md | ||
| CB-EV-0004-assertion-coverage.md | ||
| CB-EV-0005-instrument-the-table.md | ||
| CB-EV-0007-stage-0.md | ||
| CB-EV-0008-adaptive-gates.md | ||
| CB-EV-0009-inspectable-table.md | ||
| CB-EV-0010-render-port.md | ||
| CB-EV-0011-instrument-corrections.md | ||