Settle commercial identity nuances with consolidated enums and linking rules
Add commercial-identity-nuance-settlement.md resolving control_basis, binding_trigger, cross-registry Synonymity strengths, OPI branch modeling, escrow commitment type, reputation portability, payment edge cases, CRM renewal rules, Person Account adapters, and eIDAS wallet scope. Update canon, OpenQuestions, and all commercial-identity source notes.
This commit is contained in:
parent
6ea582cd9e
commit
08361f6fb7
18 changed files with 403 additions and 64 deletions
|
|
@ -88,8 +88,12 @@ persons** carrying verifiable credentials for B2B and B2G exchange.
|
|||
|
||||
## Open Questions
|
||||
|
||||
- Should qualified electronic seal be Credential subtype tied to Legal Entity only?
|
||||
- How should EUDI organizational wallet Scope relate to Tenant vs. Commercial Record?
|
||||
*(none — settled in `commercial-identity-nuance-settlement.md`)*
|
||||
|
||||
## Settled
|
||||
|
||||
- Qualified seal → **Credential** `credential_type: qualified_seal` via Representation.
|
||||
- Org wallet → **Scope** `wallet_scope`, linked to Commercial Record — not Tenant.
|
||||
|
||||
## References
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue