Settle commercial identity nuances with consolidated enums and linking rules
Add commercial-identity-nuance-settlement.md resolving control_basis, binding_trigger, cross-registry Synonymity strengths, OPI branch modeling, escrow commitment type, reputation portability, payment edge cases, CRM renewal rules, Person Account adapters, and eIDAS wallet scope. Update canon, OpenQuestions, and all commercial-identity source notes.
This commit is contained in:
parent
6ea582cd9e
commit
08361f6fb7
18 changed files with 403 additions and 64 deletions
|
|
@ -90,12 +90,12 @@ high-stakes counterparty records**.
|
|||
|
||||
## Open Questions
|
||||
|
||||
- Standard `control_basis` enum across US CDD and EU AMLD wording.
|
||||
- How to model BOI registry volatility in lifecycle without canon becoming legal advice?
|
||||
*(none — settled in `commercial-identity-nuance-settlement.md`)*
|
||||
|
||||
## Resolved (see beneficial-ownership-kyc-boi.md)
|
||||
## Settled
|
||||
|
||||
- Beneficial Owner → **Beneficial Ownership Relationship** (dedicated type, not Ownership subtype).
|
||||
- Beneficial Owner → **Beneficial Ownership Relationship**; `control_basis` enum;
|
||||
CDD vs. BOI filing layered separately.
|
||||
|
||||
## References
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue