Model reputation as counterparty assurance gradient across four tiers
Add research on the journey from gamable opinion signals (reviews, ratings) through observed metrics (PAYDEX, SLA stats), financial commitments (bonds, escrow), and adjudicated outcomes (arbitration, courts). Resolve OpenQuestions: no Reputation entity; use Reputation Signal, Performance Evidence, Commercial Commitment, and Adjudication Outcome with Counterparty Assurance Gradient pattern.
This commit is contained in:
parent
0741a2e3a5
commit
bd272151af
10 changed files with 383 additions and 11 deletions
|
|
@ -126,4 +126,9 @@ later explicit package is extracted.
|
|||
- Link registry identifiers for the same entity via Synonymity Assertion when
|
||||
multiple registries describe one Organization/Legal Entity.
|
||||
- Separate CRM Account and Stripe Customer as Commercial Records; never merge with login Account.
|
||||
- Use qualified credentials (eIDAS seal, VC) as Evidence for Commercial Commitment where applicable.
|
||||
- Use qualified credentials (eIDAS seal, VC) as Evidence for Commercial Commitment where applicable.
|
||||
- Map reviews and star ratings to Reputation Signal (opinion tier); never merge with credit scores or legal outcomes.
|
||||
- Map PAYDEX, SLA metrics, and credit bureau data to Performance Evidence (observed tier).
|
||||
- Map bonds, escrow, and signed SLAs to Commercial Commitment (committed tier).
|
||||
- Map arbitration awards and court judgments to Adjudication Outcome (adjudicated tier).
|
||||
- Trust Relationship projections must cite assurance_basis tier; weight opinion weak by default.
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue