coulomb/commerce-canon
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Model reputation as counterparty assurance gradient across four tiers

Browse source 
Add research on the journey from gamable opinion signals (reviews, ratings)
through observed metrics (PAYDEX, SLA stats), financial commitments (bonds,
escrow), and adjudicated outcomes (arbitration, courts). Resolve OpenQuestions:
no Reputation entity; use Reputation Signal, Performance Evidence, Commercial
Commitment, and Adjudication Outcome with Counterparty Assurance Gradient pattern.
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-06-21 22:57:28 +02:00
parent 0741a2e3a5
commit bd272151af
10 changed files with 383 additions and 11 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
research/commercial-identity/duns-commercial-credit-identity.md
View file

@ -77,7 +77,11 @@ interest among counterparties.
## Open Questions
- Should credit scores be canonical metadata or strictly downstream risk signals?
- Numeric score vs. assurance_tier band mapping in downstream risk engines.
## Resolved (see reputation-assurance-gradient.md)
- PAYDEX and credit scores → **Performance Evidence** (observed tier), not opinion-tier Reputation Signal.
## References