Record the Forgejo synthetic suite result.
All checks were successful
synthetic / suite (push) Successful in 48s

Assistant: grok
Assistant-Session: 01a1531b-6698-7732-8587-f28ea604bcdf
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-10-19 11:00:39 +02:00
parent 9ab74290ee
commit 70054ee7cc
2 changed files with 4 additions and 1 deletions

View file

@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
#!/bin/sh
# Synthetic suite. It does not fetch or require the OnCo corpus.
# The Forgejo job installs requirements.txt first. Node comes from the runner image.
set -eu
cd "$(dirname "$0")/.."
python3 scripts/validate_fixtures.py

View file

@ -4,7 +4,9 @@ Date: 2026-10-19
T01–T08 are done. The public suite is `.forgejo/workflows/synthetic.yaml`, which runs `sh scripts/ci-synthetic.sh` and does not fetch OnCo data.
Local CI result: `/tmp/grok-goal-60054ed6e434/implementer/ci-local.txt` runs the workflow commands (`pip install -r requirements.txt`, `npm ci` in `ui/`, then `sh scripts/ci-synthetic.sh`). The same suite was run twice before that and both exited 0 (`tests-1.txt`, `tests-2.txt`): 26 unittest tests, 34 Vitest tests. Fixture validation and the third-party notice check are in `fixtures.txt`.
Local CI result: `/tmp/grok-goal-60054ed6e434/implementer/ci-local.txt` runs the workflow commands (`pip install -r requirements.txt`, `npm ci` in `ui/`, then `sh scripts/ci-synthetic.sh`) and exits 0. The same suite was run twice before that and both exited 0 (`tests-1.txt`, `tests-2.txt`): 26 unittest tests, 34 Vitest tests. Fixture validation and the third-party notice check are in `fixtures.txt`.
Remote CI result: Forgejo check `synthetic / suite` on `9ab74290eee20b10223d06946d934967eaf7b9d5` is success (`Successful in 1m19s`). Recorded in `/tmp/grok-goal-60054ed6e434/implementer/ci-remote.txt`. The runner image already has Node, so the workflow installs the pinned Python packages with pip and does not download a separate toolchain.
Both example dataspaces pass browse, search, record open, neighbour follow, source and license, and graph focus. The keyboard pass in `a11y.txt` reached search, a result, the record, a relation link, and return at 1280×800 and 390×844, with page errors 0. Screenshots `wide.png` and `narrow.png` show the software-architecture concept index. They are not blank. Their pixels differ, and OnCo pixel equality was not measured (`screenshot-compare.txt`).