docs: reconcile core hub state and intent
Some checks failed
CI Smoke / host-smoke (push) Successful in 0s
CI Smoke / pytest-smoke (push) Failing after 2s

This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-08-21 08:49:15 +02:00
parent a7adc40c2f
commit c7b1ebb560
7 changed files with 239 additions and 23 deletions

View file

@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ It carries forward the lessons from State Hub and Inter-Hub: workplans and progr
## Key Documentation
- [INTENT.md](INTENT.md) - purpose, lineage, principles, and platform direction
- [STATE.md](STATE.md) - current production truth, open work, and known conditions
- [SCOPE.md](SCOPE.md) - repo boundary
- [Research artifact](docs/research/2026-06-27-core-hub-lineage-and-platform-reset.md) - what we learned from State Hub, Inter-Hub, Haskell/IHP, and whynot-design
- [Specs index](docs/specs/README.md) - contract and implementation specification map
@ -40,9 +41,8 @@ It carries forward the lessons from State Hub and Inter-Hub: workplans and progr
## Current Work
The contract, FastAPI/Postgres foundation, Inter-Hub migration, production
cutover, and Haskell/IHP retirement are complete. The immediate continuity
work is to relocate the existing Core Hub service from CoulombCore to
railiance01 before CoulombCore is decommissioned (`CORE-WP-0011`). Future
runtime absorption into hub-core remains a separate architecture proposal
(`CORE-WP-0010`).
The contract, FastAPI/Postgres foundation, Inter-Hub migration, Haskell/IHP
retirement, and relocation from CoulombCore to railiance01 are complete.
`CORE-WP-0011` is finished. The only open local workplan is runtime absorption
and eventual archive (`CORE-WP-0010`); it is blocked on hub-core's runtime
packaging, minimal-port, and joint-plan decisions in `HUB-WP-0004`.