coulomb-social/docs/adr/ADR-0001-netkingdom-identity.md

86 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

---
id: ADR-0001
title: NetKingdom identity for coulomb.social
status: accepted
date: 2026-08-09
workplan: CSOC-WP-0002
task: CSOC-WP-0002-T01
---
# ADR-0001 — NetKingdom identity for coulomb.social
## Status
Accepted (2026-08-09).
## Context
coulomb.social is being reestablished as a standalone business application
(DR-2 B) on the Railiance delivery lane. The business-app service contract
v0.1 defaults to **app-local accounts** (DR-3 A) with a bounded auth module
for a later OIDC switch.
A social product with many members is a poor fit for a private password
database inside the app: credential lifecycle, MFA, and user-domain profiles
already exist (or are governed) in the NetKingdom landscape.
## Decision
1. **Authentication** uses only the **NetKingdom IAM Profile** (OIDC + PKCE).
The app depends on the profile contract, not on KeyCape vs Keycloak
implementation details.
2. **User-domain facts** (account, profile, memberships, identity links) are
owned by **user-engine**. This app maps `(issuer, sub)` to a local
`Member` row for session convenience and never stores passwords.
3. **Authorization** for protected actions is decided by **flex-auth** (PDP).
The app is a PEP only (fail-closed when the PDP is unavailable for
sensitive actions). Dev may use a local deny-by-default stub until the
protected system is registered.
4. **Browser session** after successful OIDC is an application session
(Django session / signed cookie). Tokens are not treated as long-lived
API credentials in the browser.
5. **Tenant model**: all client-owned data is keyed by `tenant_id` from the
first migration (Binky Hedgehog = client #1 / reference tenant).
6. **Relationship to DR-3 A**: the contracts “app-local baseline” remains
valid for simple single-tenant tools (e.g. vergabe-teilnahme v1). This ADR
**specializes** coulomb.social onto NetKingdom identity as a product
decision; the auth code still lives in one module (§2.3) so issuer mode
can change without rewriting the product.
### Issuer modes
| Mode | When |
|------|------|
| Dev mock claims (`DEBUG` + `OIDC_ENABLED=false`) | Local unit/integration tests and offline shell work |
| local-identity / KeyCape | Bootstrap and lightweight platform environments |
| Keycloak expanded | Production / enterprise MFA & federation when platform provides it |
### Non-goals
- App-local password / MFA store
- Bubble as identity provider
- Content migration from Bubble in this identity track
- Owning KeyCape, Keycloak, user-engine, or flex-auth codebases
## Consequences
- Scaffold uses Django aligned with the business delivery lane, with a
dedicated `identity` app as the sole OIDC/session boundary.
- OpenBao (or local 0600 files) holds OIDC client secrets; nothing secret
in Git.
- Content re-claim is a separate workplan after the authenticated shell
works.
## References
- `workplans/CSOC-WP-0002-netkingdom-user-management-reestablish.md`
- `net-kingdom/canon/standards/iam-profile_v0.2.md` (and v0.3)
- `net-kingdom/canon/standards/user-engine-boundary-contract_v0.1.md`
- `the-custodian/canon/standards/business-app-service-contract_v0.1.md`
- `the-custodian/docs/business-platform-decision-records.md` (DR-2, DR-3)