diff --git a/WORK-RECORDS.md b/WORK-RECORDS.md
index 790cd3c..06f02af 100644
--- a/WORK-RECORDS.md
+++ b/WORK-RECORDS.md
@@ -8,7 +8,11 @@
 
 | Kind | ID | Status | Lane | Source |
 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
-| workplan | DECISION-WP-0001 | ready | — | workplans/DECISION-WP-0001-statehub-bootstrap.md |
-| task | DECISION-WP-0001-T01 | todo | — | workplans/DECISION-WP-0001-statehub-bootstrap.md |
-| task | DECISION-WP-0001-T02 | todo | — | workplans/DECISION-WP-0001-statehub-bootstrap.md |
-| task | DECISION-WP-0001-T03 | todo | — | workplans/DECISION-WP-0001-statehub-bootstrap.md |
+| workplan | DECISION-WP-0001 | finished | — | workplans/DECISION-WP-0001-statehub-bootstrap.md |
+| workplan | DECISION-WP-0002 | ready | — | workplans/DECISION-WP-0002-schema-probe.md |
+| task | DECISION-WP-0001-T01 | done | — | workplans/DECISION-WP-0001-statehub-bootstrap.md |
+| task | DECISION-WP-0001-T02 | done | — | workplans/DECISION-WP-0001-statehub-bootstrap.md |
+| task | DECISION-WP-0001-T03 | done | — | workplans/DECISION-WP-0001-statehub-bootstrap.md |
+| task | DECISION-WP-0002-T01 | todo | — | workplans/DECISION-WP-0002-schema-probe.md |
+| task | DECISION-WP-0002-T02 | todo | — | workplans/DECISION-WP-0002-schema-probe.md |
+| task | DECISION-WP-0002-T03 | todo | — | workplans/DECISION-WP-0002-schema-probe.md |
diff --git a/workplans/DECISION-WP-0002-schema-probe.md b/workplans/DECISION-WP-0002-schema-probe.md
index d9e1732..cbf1b1d 100644
--- a/workplans/DECISION-WP-0002-schema-probe.md
+++ b/workplans/DECISION-WP-0002-schema-probe.md
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ quality_dor: DoR-Ok
 quality_dor_at: "2026-10-04"
 quality_dor_by: "grok"
 quality_dor_note: "Bounded documentation probe. Verification is the review note. No production lane."
+state_hub_workstream_id: "71d141a3-696f-500a-923c-e9c4428a9772"
 ---
 
 # Probe the schema draft with a diverse decision set
@@ -44,6 +45,7 @@ Verification: each example file exists and uses only the schema-draft sections t
 id: DECISION-WP-0002-T01
 status: todo
 priority: high
+state_hub_task_id: "ed427f4f-ddd1-535b-9c48-b4f4636a2ba9"
 ```
 
 Add `examples/README.md` stating the file shape: one Markdown decision per file, an identity id of the form `DEC-EX-NNN`, and only the schema-draft sections the situation needs. Name the six situations this workplan covers, taken from ResearchProgram M1: a trivial engineering choice, an architecture decision, an incident-response decision, a security exception, a deployment policy, and a constitutional governance rule. Do not add a JSON Schema.
@@ -54,6 +56,7 @@ Add `examples/README.md` stating the file shape: one Markdown decision per file,
 id: DECISION-WP-0002-T02
 status: todo
 priority: high
+state_hub_task_id: "3f325298-6d04-5913-8100-a7d8dd37ca88"
 ```
 
 Write one example file for each situation named in T01. Keep the trivial choice to the question, the choice, and the reason. Let the constitutional example carry governance and effects on later decisions. Leave unknown fields absent.
@@ -64,6 +67,7 @@ Write one example file for each situation named in T01. Keep the trivial choice
 id: DECISION-WP-0002-T03
 status: todo
 priority: medium
+state_hub_task_id: "18808c39-4b81-57df-892b-c3b2fddbb0bb"
 ```
 
 Write `reviews/schema-pressure.md`. For each example, record which schema sections were necessary, which were awkward, and which questions from ResearchProgram section 7 the example raises. Stop when that note exists. Leave the schema draft unchanged unless an example cannot be written without one named clarification, and record that clarification in the note.