Record the 0.2.6 role-token rerun.

Codex, Claude, and Grok use session-owner and zone-engine on the two cases. The unsigned draft names that rerun and stays unsubmitted. RISK-F-0015 stays open.

Assistant: grok
Assistant-Session: 01a10286-9185-7bb2-b411-89cf6ab4c0c6
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-10-03 23:14:31 +02:00
parent cd9602c9d9
commit d8ec3c00a7
10 changed files with 303 additions and 12 deletions

View file

@ -52,12 +52,14 @@ booleans. No listener, submitter grant, custody, or live route is claimed.
A creating approval without a retained receipt is not retried.
0.2.6 names the session owner as the recipient of a provider switch or
compaction reload. glas-harness owns that session boundary. A live
zone-endpoint question goes to zone-engine. A two-case rerun on this seal
has Codex, Claude, and Grok name zone-engine for that endpoint question and
glas-harness for the reload. They do not use the fixture role label
session-owner. The rerun is not a full 28-case probe, not compaction proof,
and not acceptance of RISK-F-0015. 0.2.4 route results do not certify this
wording.
zone-endpoint question goes to zone-engine. The first two-case rerun on this
seal has Codex, Claude, and Grok name zone-engine for that endpoint question
and glas-harness for the reload. They do not use the fixture role label
session-owner. A later two-case rerun, after the probe prompt named the token
session-owner, has all three record that route and keep glas-harness in
sources. Some source lists also name other card or envelope owners. Neither
rerun is a full 28-case probe, compaction proof, or acceptance of
RISK-F-0015. 0.2.4 route results do not certify this wording.
The draft is unsubmitted. The proposed memo class and review group must be
confirmed by the owner; a synthetic test grant proves format only. INFD-WP-0005