coulomb/emergent-security
5
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Reconcile published offline intake in knowledge 0.2.4

Browse source 
Informed Decision 15c330cc documents an offline intake service with empty
registries and no live listener. The decisions card carries those limits.
The unsigned draft binds the new digest and is not submitted.
EMERGENT-WP-0002 stays blocked.

Assistant: grok
Assistant-Session: 01a10286-9185-7bb2-b411-89cf6ab4c0c6
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-10-03 20:14:41 +02:00
parent 5cdb4d39f6
commit ee2e17a2d2
16 changed files with 208 additions and 58 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

14
tools/build_adoption_draft.py
View file

@ -38,12 +38,14 @@ Changing the reviewed package requires a new review, not reuse of this answer.
Evidence: knowledge/sources.yaml; docs/decision-runbook-integration.md;
docs/operational-contracts.md; docs/adoption-review.md; docs/evidence/.
Earlier provider reports and owner reviews retain their original release pins.
Whitehat's separately authored offline 0.2.1 review found loaded-package binding
and lifecycle gaps; 0.2.2 addresses them with local regressions. Review close-out
and clean independent acceptance remain incomplete. No full Grok validation is claimed.
Actual compaction/harness proof and wider adoption remain open in EMERGENT-WP-0002.
0.2.3 re-pins Informed Decision at f0c60637 after its workplan recorded the
unadmitted 0.2.2 route. No intake, grant, schema, or authority change is included.
Whitehat's offline review accepted remediation of the two loaded-package library
findings on the 0.2.3 digest, with disclosed shared-session limits. Provider
routing renewal, continuity, and harness proof remain open. No full Grok
validation is claimed.
0.2.4 reviews Informed Decision at 15c330cc. An offline intake service, ledger,
and doctrine constraints are documented there. No listener, submitter grant,
custody, or live route is claimed. A creating approval without a retained
receipt is not retried.
The draft is unsubmitted. The proposed memo class and review group must be
confirmed by the owner; a synthetic test grant proves format only. INFD-WP-0005