coulomb/fin-hub
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

feat: publish unblended AI-plan effectiveness series

Browse source 
Report booked cost, entitlement, token coverage, and work as three
series: work per measured token, work per measured+estimated token,
and work per euro. Months below 50% coverage are unfit for token
trends. There is no blended efficiency number.
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-08-15 19:53:28 +02:00
parent ee90ba2873
commit 033ad3f41f
12 changed files with 512 additions and 6 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

8
workplans/FIN-WP-0007-ai-plan-token-effectiveness.md
View file

@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ as `AllocationEvidence` and does not change booked totals.
```task
id: FIN-WP-0007-T06
status: todo
status: done
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "cea14702-faca-4024-b6f8-1ad221b70624"
```
@ -334,6 +334,12 @@ Done when two fixture months with different coverage cannot produce a
chart in which the worse-measured month looks cheaper per unit of
work unless that is also true on the measured-only series.
Completed 2026-08-15: `ledger effectiveness` and `GET /effectiveness`
publish the three series and mark coverage below 0.50 as `unfit`.
Implied €/token is labelled inferred. A low-coverage month cannot be
ranked cheaper on a token series; there is no blended efficiency
field.
## Send canon feedback
```task