fluid-core/workplans/FLUID-WP-0006-fluid-science.md

136 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

---
id: FLUID-WP-0006
type: workplan
title: "FLUID Science - the adaptation loop closes (Blueprint Phase C)"
domain: infotech
repo: fluid-core
Add science control APIs and the hypothesis, experiment and promote CLI Completes FLUID-WP-0006. The loop now runs end to end from the command line: two competing presentation hypotheses, an experiment that issues a routing policy rather than touching traffic, an amendment, a stop that returns traffic to the default, a confirmed outcome, a resolved competition, and a promotion the gate can refuse. Starting or stopping an experiment returns the routing policy for the operator to install rather than installing it. Blueprint 17 keeps the controller out of the traffic path, and installing from the handler would put it straight back in; emitting the document keeps the separation visible instead of implied. `fluid audit trace` now answers the section 25 questions from events rather than summary records, and names the rivals a hypothesis beat: an audit asking which hypotheses were considered is not answered by naming only the winner. Two fixes found by driving the CLI rather than only the tests. Go's flag package stops at the first positional, so ids given after flags silently swallowed them; ids are now taken before parsing. And there was no way to attach a revision to the hypothesis that produced it, which left `audit trace` unable to say why a revision existed -- `hypothesis attach` closes that. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014KmVxhJ35tCo7rE7UnLwWu Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 1116572@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 8ba9bb93-a72a-4883-b189-2499cce5c400
2026-09-04 06:44:47 +02:00
status: done
owner: worsch
topic_slug: fluid-core
created: "2026-09-04"
updated: "2026-09-04"
planning_priority: high
planning_order: 5
depends_on:
- FLUID-WP-0005
state_hub_workstream_id: "b7096155-2641-5df2-857b-13d4240e7e3f"
---
# FLUID-WP-0006 - FLUID Science
Hypotheses, experiments, fitness and promotion. Entirely human-driven — the
Daimon is deliberately absent. Blueprint §50 says the success criterion is
proving this loop works cleanly and safely, not autonomous coding.
## T01 - Hypothesis records and lifecycle
```task
id: FLUID-WP-0006-T01
Add science control APIs and the hypothesis, experiment and promote CLI Completes FLUID-WP-0006. The loop now runs end to end from the command line: two competing presentation hypotheses, an experiment that issues a routing policy rather than touching traffic, an amendment, a stop that returns traffic to the default, a confirmed outcome, a resolved competition, and a promotion the gate can refuse. Starting or stopping an experiment returns the routing policy for the operator to install rather than installing it. Blueprint 17 keeps the controller out of the traffic path, and installing from the handler would put it straight back in; emitting the document keeps the separation visible instead of implied. `fluid audit trace` now answers the section 25 questions from events rather than summary records, and names the rivals a hypothesis beat: an audit asking which hypotheses were considered is not answered by naming only the winner. Two fixes found by driving the CLI rather than only the tests. Go's flag package stops at the first positional, so ids given after flags silently swallowed them; ids are now taken before parsing. And there was no way to attach a revision to the hypothesis that produced it, which left `audit trace` unable to say why a revision existed -- `hypothesis attach` closes that. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014KmVxhJ35tCo7rE7UnLwWu Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 1116572@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 8ba9bb93-a72a-4883-b189-2499cce5c400
2026-09-04 06:44:47 +02:00
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "93dd0a6d-3f46-5da5-857d-e0bd49c356db"
```
Schema doc §2: DRAFT, READY, PRIORITIZED, DESIGNING, EXPERIMENTING, EVALUATING,
then ACCEPTED, REJECTED, SUPERSEDED or DEFERRED. Keep observation, explanation,
prediction, intervention and result separate — schema doc §18 warns that
collapsing them into one narrative destroys criticism and auditability.
## T02 - Competition groups
```task
id: FLUID-WP-0006-T02
Add science control APIs and the hypothesis, experiment and promote CLI Completes FLUID-WP-0006. The loop now runs end to end from the command line: two competing presentation hypotheses, an experiment that issues a routing policy rather than touching traffic, an amendment, a stop that returns traffic to the default, a confirmed outcome, a resolved competition, and a promotion the gate can refuse. Starting or stopping an experiment returns the routing policy for the operator to install rather than installing it. Blueprint 17 keeps the controller out of the traffic path, and installing from the handler would put it straight back in; emitting the document keeps the separation visible instead of implied. `fluid audit trace` now answers the section 25 questions from events rather than summary records, and names the rivals a hypothesis beat: an audit asking which hypotheses were considered is not answered by naming only the winner. Two fixes found by driving the CLI rather than only the tests. Go's flag package stops at the first positional, so ids given after flags silently swallowed them; ids are now taken before parsing. And there was no way to attach a revision to the hypothesis that produced it, which left `audit trace` unable to say why a revision existed -- `hypothesis attach` closes that. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014KmVxhJ35tCo7rE7UnLwWu Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 1116572@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 8ba9bb93-a72a-4883-b189-2499cce5c400
2026-09-04 06:44:47 +02:00
status: done
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "81f6a22f-929e-5c94-bc61-f4e06ad7de16"
```
Rival explanations of one pressure coexist (schema doc §6). Preserving
uncertainty is a feature.
## T03 - Hypothesis API
```task
id: FLUID-WP-0006-T03
Add science control APIs and the hypothesis, experiment and promote CLI Completes FLUID-WP-0006. The loop now runs end to end from the command line: two competing presentation hypotheses, an experiment that issues a routing policy rather than touching traffic, an amendment, a stop that returns traffic to the default, a confirmed outcome, a resolved competition, and a promotion the gate can refuse. Starting or stopping an experiment returns the routing policy for the operator to install rather than installing it. Blueprint 17 keeps the controller out of the traffic path, and installing from the handler would put it straight back in; emitting the document keeps the separation visible instead of implied. `fluid audit trace` now answers the section 25 questions from events rather than summary records, and names the rivals a hypothesis beat: an audit asking which hypotheses were considered is not answered by naming only the winner. Two fixes found by driving the CLI rather than only the tests. Go's flag package stops at the first positional, so ids given after flags silently swallowed them; ids are now taken before parsing. And there was no way to attach a revision to the hypothesis that produced it, which left `audit trace` unable to say why a revision existed -- `hypothesis attach` closes that. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014KmVxhJ35tCo7rE7UnLwWu Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 1116572@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 8ba9bb93-a72a-4883-b189-2499cce5c400
2026-09-04 06:44:47 +02:00
status: done
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "0050d3e4-cc5c-5e1d-9d29-d14bace0e1cf"
```
Blueprint §44.3: create, compare, prioritize, attach candidate, record outcome.
## T04 - Experiment controller
```task
id: FLUID-WP-0006-T04
Add science control APIs and the hypothesis, experiment and promote CLI Completes FLUID-WP-0006. The loop now runs end to end from the command line: two competing presentation hypotheses, an experiment that issues a routing policy rather than touching traffic, an amendment, a stop that returns traffic to the default, a confirmed outcome, a resolved competition, and a promotion the gate can refuse. Starting or stopping an experiment returns the routing policy for the operator to install rather than installing it. Blueprint 17 keeps the controller out of the traffic path, and installing from the handler would put it straight back in; emitting the document keeps the separation visible instead of implied. `fluid audit trace` now answers the section 25 questions from events rather than summary records, and names the rivals a hypothesis beat: an audit asking which hypotheses were considered is not answered by naming only the winner. Two fixes found by driving the CLI rather than only the tests. Go's flag package stops at the first positional, so ids given after flags silently swallowed them; ids are now taken before parsing. And there was no way to attach a revision to the hypothesis that produced it, which left `audit trace` unable to say why a revision existed -- `hypothesis attach` closes that. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014KmVxhJ35tCo7rE7UnLwWu Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 1116572@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 8ba9bb93-a72a-4883-b189-2499cce5c400
2026-09-04 06:44:47 +02:00
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "36391a67-6a3e-54c9-afc5-181e0b968f85"
```
Blueprint §16. Declares hypothesis, control, candidate, cohorts, allocation,
metrics, guardrails, start and stop conditions, maximum duration. Per §17 it
must not touch traffic directly: it writes routing policy the router consumes.
Experiments are interruptible.
## T05 - Experiment API
```task
id: FLUID-WP-0006-T05
Add science control APIs and the hypothesis, experiment and promote CLI Completes FLUID-WP-0006. The loop now runs end to end from the command line: two competing presentation hypotheses, an experiment that issues a routing policy rather than touching traffic, an amendment, a stop that returns traffic to the default, a confirmed outcome, a resolved competition, and a promotion the gate can refuse. Starting or stopping an experiment returns the routing policy for the operator to install rather than installing it. Blueprint 17 keeps the controller out of the traffic path, and installing from the handler would put it straight back in; emitting the document keeps the separation visible instead of implied. `fluid audit trace` now answers the section 25 questions from events rather than summary records, and names the rivals a hypothesis beat: an audit asking which hypotheses were considered is not answered by naming only the winner. Two fixes found by driving the CLI rather than only the tests. Go's flag package stops at the first positional, so ids given after flags silently swallowed them; ids are now taken before parsing. And there was no way to attach a revision to the hypothesis that produced it, which left `audit trace` unable to say why a revision existed -- `hypothesis attach` closes that. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014KmVxhJ35tCo7rE7UnLwWu Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 1116572@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 8ba9bb93-a72a-4883-b189-2499cce5c400
2026-09-04 06:44:47 +02:00
status: done
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "2c2a1ff5-f908-565f-ae5b-c0eb469e6482"
```
Blueprint §44.4: create, start, change bounded allocation, stop, record metrics,
finalize.
## T06 - Fitness evaluation against hypotheses
```task
id: FLUID-WP-0006-T06
Add science control APIs and the hypothesis, experiment and promote CLI Completes FLUID-WP-0006. The loop now runs end to end from the command line: two competing presentation hypotheses, an experiment that issues a routing policy rather than touching traffic, an amendment, a stop that returns traffic to the default, a confirmed outcome, a resolved competition, and a promotion the gate can refuse. Starting or stopping an experiment returns the routing policy for the operator to install rather than installing it. Blueprint 17 keeps the controller out of the traffic path, and installing from the handler would put it straight back in; emitting the document keeps the separation visible instead of implied. `fluid audit trace` now answers the section 25 questions from events rather than summary records, and names the rivals a hypothesis beat: an audit asking which hypotheses were considered is not answered by naming only the winner. Two fixes found by driving the CLI rather than only the tests. Go's flag package stops at the first positional, so ids given after flags silently swallowed them; ids are now taken before parsing. And there was no way to attach a revision to the hypothesis that produced it, which left `audit trace` unable to say why a revision existed -- `hypothesis attach` closes that. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014KmVxhJ35tCo7rE7UnLwWu Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 1116572@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 8ba9bb93-a72a-4883-b189-2499cce5c400
2026-09-04 06:44:47 +02:00
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "7223f795-a005-5fe0-9abb-45e4803a3091"
```
Wire the fitness engine to experiments. Success criteria may not be changed
after results are visible without recording the amendment (§18).
## T07 - Promotion controller
```task
id: FLUID-WP-0006-T07
Add science control APIs and the hypothesis, experiment and promote CLI Completes FLUID-WP-0006. The loop now runs end to end from the command line: two competing presentation hypotheses, an experiment that issues a routing policy rather than touching traffic, an amendment, a stop that returns traffic to the default, a confirmed outcome, a resolved competition, and a promotion the gate can refuse. Starting or stopping an experiment returns the routing policy for the operator to install rather than installing it. Blueprint 17 keeps the controller out of the traffic path, and installing from the handler would put it straight back in; emitting the document keeps the separation visible instead of implied. `fluid audit trace` now answers the section 25 questions from events rather than summary records, and names the rivals a hypothesis beat: an audit asking which hypotheses were considered is not answered by naming only the winner. Two fixes found by driving the CLI rather than only the tests. Go's flag package stops at the first positional, so ids given after flags silently swallowed them; ids are now taken before parsing. And there was no way to attach a revision to the hypothesis that produced it, which left `audit trace` unable to say why a revision existed -- `hypothesis attach` closes that. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014KmVxhJ35tCo7rE7UnLwWu Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 1116572@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 8ba9bb93-a72a-4883-b189-2499cce5c400
2026-09-04 06:44:47 +02:00
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "59188ee2-81e6-5331-a0f6-673b7daf871e"
```
PROMOTE, EXPAND_EXPERIMENT, RETAIN_AS_OPTION, MODIFY, REVERT, ABANDON, DEFER
recorded as decisions with an authorizing actor (§19). Human authority only.
## T08 - Append-only event log
```task
id: FLUID-WP-0006-T08
Add science control APIs and the hypothesis, experiment and promote CLI Completes FLUID-WP-0006. The loop now runs end to end from the command line: two competing presentation hypotheses, an experiment that issues a routing policy rather than touching traffic, an amendment, a stop that returns traffic to the default, a confirmed outcome, a resolved competition, and a promotion the gate can refuse. Starting or stopping an experiment returns the routing policy for the operator to install rather than installing it. Blueprint 17 keeps the controller out of the traffic path, and installing from the handler would put it straight back in; emitting the document keeps the separation visible instead of implied. `fluid audit trace` now answers the section 25 questions from events rather than summary records, and names the rivals a hypothesis beat: an audit asking which hypotheses were considered is not answered by naming only the winner. Two fixes found by driving the CLI rather than only the tests. Go's flag package stops at the first positional, so ids given after flags silently swallowed them; ids are now taken before parsing. And there was no way to attach a revision to the hypothesis that produced it, which left `audit trace` unable to say why a revision existed -- `hypothesis attach` closes that. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014KmVxhJ35tCo7rE7UnLwWu Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 1116572@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 8ba9bb93-a72a-4883-b189-2499cce5c400
2026-09-04 06:44:47 +02:00
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "8eb2e90c-6c65-5ef5-be19-d42c2b091d8c"
```
Every transition above as a `fluid_event` (schema doc §15). FLUID evolution is
itself a system behavior that must remain reconstructable.
## T09 - Audit trace command
```task
id: FLUID-WP-0006-T09
Add science control APIs and the hypothesis, experiment and promote CLI Completes FLUID-WP-0006. The loop now runs end to end from the command line: two competing presentation hypotheses, an experiment that issues a routing policy rather than touching traffic, an amendment, a stop that returns traffic to the default, a confirmed outcome, a resolved competition, and a promotion the gate can refuse. Starting or stopping an experiment returns the routing policy for the operator to install rather than installing it. Blueprint 17 keeps the controller out of the traffic path, and installing from the handler would put it straight back in; emitting the document keeps the separation visible instead of implied. `fluid audit trace` now answers the section 25 questions from events rather than summary records, and names the rivals a hypothesis beat: an audit asking which hypotheses were considered is not answered by naming only the winner. Two fixes found by driving the CLI rather than only the tests. Go's flag package stops at the first positional, so ids given after flags silently swallowed them; ids are now taken before parsing. And there was no way to attach a revision to the hypothesis that produced it, which left `audit trace` unable to say why a revision existed -- `hypothesis attach` closes that. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014KmVxhJ35tCo7rE7UnLwWu Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 1116572@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 8ba9bb93-a72a-4883-b189-2499cce5c400
2026-09-04 06:44:47 +02:00
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "7dd49f06-9cc7-5791-abfb-33b27649ba8a"
```
`fluid audit trace <revision>` reconstructs pressure, hypothesis, revision,
experiment, fitness and decision, answering all eleven questions in API
Standards §25.