Close FLUID-WP-0009 T03 and mark blocked workplans as such
Some checks failed
ci / build (push) Failing after 3h10m20s

Audited fluid-core for accidental coupling to the Hall of Helix campaign
(redaction defaults, classifier thresholds, fitness metric names,
examples/echo-interface): none found beyond the deliberate conformance
handover test. Generalized one stray "hall-of-helix" example in a
connector.go comment.

FLUID-WP-0008 and FLUID-WP-0009 have no remaining tasks this repo can
act on — the rest are blocked on human steps (BotFather, Telegram
channel creation) or on other repos (fluid-telegram FT-WP-0001 T12,
a second fluid-x/fluid-substack interface) — so both move to status:
blocked.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: sonnet
Assistant-Process: 251457@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: fbcdbf1e-8619-4c11-a73f-2fd270008c35
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-09-27 22:09:49 +02:00
parent cd06c83413
commit 3c4eb1125d
3 changed files with 31 additions and 6 deletions

View file

@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ func (c *Connector) Call(ctx context.Context, rev contract.Revision, r *http.Req
}
// Only idempotent methods are retried. Replaying a POST because an adapter
// was slow would publish the same hall-of-helix entry twice.
// was slow would create the same resource twice.
if !idempotent(r.Method) {
attempts = 1
}

View file

@ -4,12 +4,12 @@ type: workplan
title: "Handover: HelixForge Telegram identity and hall-of-helix channel"
domain: infotech
repo: fluid-core
status: active
status: blocked
flavor: implementation
owner: worsch
topic_slug: fluid-core
created: "2026-09-04"
updated: "2026-09-04"
updated: "2026-09-27"
planning_priority: high
planning_order: 7
depends_on:

View file

@ -4,12 +4,12 @@ type: workplan
title: "Establish the pr- campaign repository pattern and reduce hall-of-helix to an example"
domain: infotech
repo: fluid-core
status: active
status: blocked
flavor: implementation
owner: worsch
topic_slug: fluid-core
created: "2026-09-04"
updated: "2026-09-04"
updated: "2026-09-27"
planning_priority: medium
planning_order: 9
depends_on:
@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ interface reports.
```task
id: FLUID-WP-0009-T03
status: todo
status: done
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "d9c69244-19ef-5eaf-9f43-d0374d6278de"
```
@ -124,6 +124,31 @@ the classifier's thresholds, the fitness metric names, and whether
`examples/echo-interface` is doing enough work to be the general example it
claims to be.
**Audited (2026-09-27).** No accidental coupling found:
- `internal/observation/redact.go` `DefaultRedactionPolicy` — patterns target
bearer tokens, emails and connection strings; nothing Telegram- or
hall-of-helix-specific.
- `internal/observation/classify.go` `DefaultClassifierOptions` — thresholds
(`RepeatThreshold`, `MinConsumers`, `ErrorRateThreshold`) are generic
interaction-shape numbers, not tuned to one interface's traffic.
- `internal/fitness/fitness.go` — metric names are caller-supplied strings
(`MetricSpec.Name`); the package carries none of its own.
- `examples/echo-interface` — already the general §33 worked example
(`GET /v1/entries` / `GET /v1/entries/latest`); it has no dependency on the
Telegram case and is deliberately kept separate from it.
- One accidental reference: a comment in `internal/runtime/connector.go`
naming "hall-of-helix" as the illustrative example for why non-idempotent
methods aren't retried. Generalized to "the same resource" — no functional
coupling, just a stray name in prose.
- The only deliberate coupling is the conformance handover test
(`conformance/loop/loop_test.go`, `internal/control/api_test.go`) using
`hall-publishing` as its interface ID, exactly as this task already expected.
Conclusion: fluid-core does not quietly assume the Hall of Helix campaign.
T05's second-interface test remains the real proof, but nothing found here
would block it.
## T04 — Reduce the Telegram case to a documented example
```task