Completes FLUID-WP-0005. Normalization and redaction live on one path,
shared by the in-process emitter and the ingest endpoint: two paths with
two normalizations would eventually disagree, and the disagreement would
surface as a pressure finding that is really a pipeline bug.
Telemetry kind is inferred from event shape rather than defaulting to
"request", since an error filed as a request understates the interface's
failure rate. A malformed event in a batch does not discard the rest.
Feedback is stored as evidence and creates no pressure and no hypothesis
on its own, per API Standards 15, with the consumer recorded as the
actor so their untrusted status stays visible in the audit trail. The
feedback endpoint is the only consumer-reachable part of the control
plane.
The observation endpoints are not served at all when no pseudonymization
salt is configured, rather than served with a generated one: a salt that
changed per run would make the same consumer look new every time and
every cohort count wrong.
Adds an end-to-end test driving real traffic through the gateway and
confirming it becomes a classified pressure record, with no raw consumer
identity reaching the store.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014KmVxhJ35tCo7rE7UnLwWu
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 1116572@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 8ba9bb93-a72a-4883-b189-2499cce5c400
Completes FLUID-WP-0004. The Revision and Intent APIs (Blueprint 44.1
and 44.5) are served by fluid-control, which is deliberately off the
request path and must never be reachable by interface consumers: it is
the mechanism that evolves the interface in response to their behaviour.
Intent amendment is a proposal, never an edit. Rewriting a recorded
version returns 409, because changing what a version says would change
what already-published revisions were governed by.
A rejected candidate comes back as 422 with its full stage report rather
than as a server fault. Rejection is a normal outcome (invariant 14) and
the reasons are the evidence a later hypothesis needs.
Also closes a real hole this workplan opened: `fluid revision publish`
previously wrote straight into the evidence store, which was a way
around the deterministic policy gate for anyone with shell access. It
now runs the same pipeline the control plane does and requires a signing
key.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014KmVxhJ35tCo7rE7UnLwWu
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 1116572@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 8ba9bb93-a72a-4883-b189-2499cce5c400
