FLUID-WP-0006 T01, T02, T04, T07. The lifecycle graph is explicit because the states carry meaning a reader relies on: a hypothesis that jumped from DRAFT to ACCEPTED would claim evidence it never gathered and the audit trail would show nothing wrong. Drafting stays cheap and completeness is checked at READY, which is the claim that an idea is worth someone's time. Competition membership is symmetric, so a reader looking at one hypothesis cannot miss that a rival exists. Losing a competition supersedes rather than rejects: rejection says the explanation was wrong, superseded says a better one won, and the distinction matters when the winner is later refuted. The experiment controller never touches traffic. Start returns a routing policy for the router to consume and Stop returns one with no rules, so interrupting an experiment is a document replacement rather than an unwind. Allocation must sum to one, or matching traffic would fall through to the default and quietly contaminate the control arm. Promotion consults the gate and never bypasses it. A human may promote against an inconclusive verdict, but only with an acknowledged override that is recorded as one; outcomes that reduce exposure need no gate at all, since requiring permission to stop would point a safety property the wrong way. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014KmVxhJ35tCo7rE7UnLwWu Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 1116572@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 8ba9bb93-a72a-4883-b189-2499cce5c400
262 lines
8.4 KiB
Go
262 lines
8.4 KiB
Go
// Package promotion records decisions about whether a candidate may progress.
|
|
//
|
|
// ArchitectureBlueprint.md section 19 lists the possible outcomes and section
|
|
// 28.1 keeps promotion authority separate from code-generation authority. This
|
|
// package records a decision and its justification; it does not make one. The
|
|
// deterministic policy gate decides what is permissible, a human or a policy
|
|
// decides what is wanted, and this is where that decision becomes evidence.
|
|
package promotion
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"context"
|
|
"encoding/json"
|
|
"errors"
|
|
"fmt"
|
|
"sort"
|
|
"time"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/tegwick/fluid-core/internal/contract"
|
|
"github.com/tegwick/fluid-core/internal/evidence"
|
|
"github.com/tegwick/fluid-core/internal/fitness"
|
|
"github.com/tegwick/fluid-core/internal/policy"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// Outcome is a promotion decision.
|
|
type Outcome string
|
|
|
|
const (
|
|
Promote Outcome = "PROMOTE"
|
|
ExpandExperiment Outcome = "EXPAND_EXPERIMENT"
|
|
RetainAsOption Outcome = "RETAIN_AS_OPTION"
|
|
Modify Outcome = "MODIFY"
|
|
Revert Outcome = "REVERT"
|
|
Abandon Outcome = "ABANDON"
|
|
Defer Outcome = "DEFER"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// Valid reports whether o is a defined outcome.
|
|
func (o Outcome) Valid() bool {
|
|
switch o {
|
|
case Promote, ExpandExperiment, RetainAsOption, Modify, Revert, Abandon, Defer:
|
|
return true
|
|
}
|
|
return false
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Decision is a recorded promotion decision.
|
|
type Decision struct {
|
|
ID contract.DecisionID `json:"id"`
|
|
Revision contract.RevisionID `json:"revision"`
|
|
Outcome Outcome `json:"outcome"`
|
|
Reason string `json:"reason"`
|
|
Actor contract.Actor `json:"actor"`
|
|
DecidedAt time.Time `json:"decided_at"`
|
|
|
|
// Experiment and Hypothesis tie the decision back to the evidence it rests
|
|
// on, so a later reader can check the reasoning rather than take it.
|
|
Experiment contract.ExperimentID `json:"experiment,omitempty"`
|
|
Hypotheses []contract.HypothesisID `json:"hypotheses,omitempty"`
|
|
|
|
// FitnessVerdict is the evaluator's reading at decision time.
|
|
FitnessVerdict fitness.Verdict `json:"fitness_verdict,omitempty"`
|
|
// GateDecision is the deterministic gate's verdict at decision time.
|
|
GateAllowed bool `json:"gate_allowed"`
|
|
GateReasons []string `json:"gate_reasons,omitempty"`
|
|
// Override marks a decision taken against the evidence or the gate.
|
|
Override bool `json:"override,omitempty"`
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Controller records promotion decisions.
|
|
type Controller struct {
|
|
store evidence.Store
|
|
gate *policy.Gate
|
|
now func() time.Time
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// NewController returns a promotion controller.
|
|
func NewController(store evidence.Store, gate *policy.Gate) *Controller {
|
|
return &Controller{store: store, gate: gate, now: time.Now}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
var (
|
|
// ErrGateRefused reports a promotion the deterministic gate forbids.
|
|
ErrGateRefused = errors.New("the deterministic policy gate refuses this promotion")
|
|
// ErrNoEvidence reports a promotion with nothing behind it.
|
|
ErrNoEvidence = errors.New("promotion requires a fitness verdict")
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// Request is a proposed promotion.
|
|
type Request struct {
|
|
Revision contract.RevisionID
|
|
Outcome Outcome
|
|
Reason string
|
|
Actor contract.Actor
|
|
Experiment contract.ExperimentID
|
|
Hypotheses []contract.HypothesisID
|
|
|
|
// Evaluation is the fitness reading the decision rests on.
|
|
Evaluation *fitness.Evaluation
|
|
// GateInput lets the controller re-run the deterministic gate at decision
|
|
// time rather than trusting a verdict computed earlier, since the intent or
|
|
// the limits may have changed since.
|
|
GateInput *policy.Input
|
|
|
|
// AcknowledgeOverride is required to promote against the evidence. It does
|
|
// not disable the gate — nothing does — but it does permit promoting a
|
|
// candidate whose fitness verdict was not a success, with the override
|
|
// recorded as such.
|
|
AcknowledgeOverride bool
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Decide records a promotion decision.
|
|
//
|
|
// The gate is consulted, never bypassed. A human may promote a candidate whose
|
|
// experiment was inconclusive — that is a legitimate judgement call — but they
|
|
// may not promote one the gate refuses, and choosing to act against the
|
|
// evidence is recorded as an override rather than washed into the reason text.
|
|
func (c *Controller) Decide(ctx context.Context, req Request) (Decision, error) {
|
|
if !req.Outcome.Valid() {
|
|
return Decision{}, fmt.Errorf("unknown promotion outcome %q", req.Outcome)
|
|
}
|
|
if req.Reason == "" {
|
|
return Decision{}, errors.New("a promotion decision requires a reason")
|
|
}
|
|
if req.Actor.ID == "" {
|
|
return Decision{}, errors.New("a promotion decision must name its actor")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
d := Decision{
|
|
ID: contract.DecisionID(fmt.Sprintf("D-%s-%d", req.Revision, c.now().UnixNano())),
|
|
Revision: req.Revision,
|
|
Outcome: req.Outcome,
|
|
Reason: req.Reason,
|
|
Actor: req.Actor,
|
|
DecidedAt: c.now().UTC(),
|
|
Experiment: req.Experiment,
|
|
Hypotheses: req.Hypotheses,
|
|
GateAllowed: true,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if req.Evaluation != nil {
|
|
d.FitnessVerdict = req.Evaluation.Verdict
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Only outcomes that widen exposure need the gate. Reverting, abandoning
|
|
// or deferring reduce risk, and requiring permission to stop would be a
|
|
// safety property pointed the wrong way.
|
|
if wideningExposure(req.Outcome) {
|
|
if req.GateInput == nil {
|
|
return d, errors.New("promoting requires gate input describing the candidate")
|
|
}
|
|
decision := c.gate.Evaluate(*req.GateInput)
|
|
d.GateAllowed = decision.Allowed
|
|
d.GateReasons = decision.Reasons
|
|
|
|
if !decision.Allowed {
|
|
// Record the refusal before returning: an attempted promotion that
|
|
// the gate blocked is exactly the kind of thing an audit wants.
|
|
_ = c.record(ctx, d, "PROMOTION_REFUSED")
|
|
return d, fmt.Errorf("%w: %v", ErrGateRefused, decision.Reasons)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if req.Evaluation == nil {
|
|
return d, ErrNoEvidence
|
|
}
|
|
if req.Evaluation.Verdict != fitness.VerdictSucceeded {
|
|
if !req.AcknowledgeOverride {
|
|
return d, fmt.Errorf(
|
|
"fitness verdict is %s, not %s: pass an acknowledged override to promote anyway (%v)",
|
|
req.Evaluation.Verdict, fitness.VerdictSucceeded, req.Evaluation.Reasons)
|
|
}
|
|
d.Override = true
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if err := c.put(ctx, d); err != nil {
|
|
return d, err
|
|
}
|
|
return d, c.record(ctx, d, "PROMOTION_DECIDED")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// wideningExposure reports whether an outcome increases a candidate's reach.
|
|
func wideningExposure(o Outcome) bool {
|
|
switch o {
|
|
case Promote, ExpandExperiment:
|
|
return true
|
|
}
|
|
return false
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Get returns one decision.
|
|
func (c *Controller) Get(ctx context.Context, id contract.DecisionID) (Decision, error) {
|
|
body, err := c.store.Record(ctx, contract.KindDecision, string(id))
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return Decision{}, err
|
|
}
|
|
var d Decision
|
|
if err := json.Unmarshal(body, &d); err != nil {
|
|
return Decision{}, fmt.Errorf("decode decision %s: %w", id, err)
|
|
}
|
|
return d, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ForRevision returns the decisions taken about a revision, oldest first.
|
|
func (c *Controller) ForRevision(ctx context.Context, rev contract.RevisionID) ([]Decision, error) {
|
|
records, err := c.store.Records(ctx, contract.KindDecision)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
var out []Decision
|
|
for _, body := range records {
|
|
var d Decision
|
|
if err := json.Unmarshal(body, &d); err != nil {
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
if d.Revision != rev {
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
out = append(out, d)
|
|
}
|
|
sort.Slice(out, func(i, j int) bool { return out[i].DecidedAt.Before(out[j].DecidedAt) })
|
|
return out, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (c *Controller) put(ctx context.Context, d Decision) error {
|
|
body, err := json.Marshal(d)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return err
|
|
}
|
|
return c.store.PutRecord(ctx, contract.KindDecision, string(d.ID), body)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (c *Controller) record(ctx context.Context, d Decision, kind string) error {
|
|
inputs := make([]string, 0, len(d.Hypotheses)+1)
|
|
for _, h := range d.Hypotheses {
|
|
inputs = append(inputs, string(h))
|
|
}
|
|
if d.Experiment != "" {
|
|
inputs = append(inputs, string(d.Experiment))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
reason := d.Reason
|
|
if d.Override {
|
|
// The override is part of the record, not a footnote in the prose.
|
|
reason = fmt.Sprintf("[override: fitness verdict was %s] %s", d.FitnessVerdict, reason)
|
|
}
|
|
if !d.GateAllowed {
|
|
reason = fmt.Sprintf("[gate refused: %v] %s", d.GateReasons, reason)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return c.store.AppendEvent(ctx, contract.FluidEvent{
|
|
SchemaVersion: "0.1",
|
|
ID: contract.EventID(fmt.Sprintf("EV-%s-%d", d.ID, c.now().UnixNano())),
|
|
OccurredAt: d.DecidedAt,
|
|
EntityType: contract.FluidEventEntityTypeRevision,
|
|
EntityID: string(d.Revision),
|
|
EventType: fmt.Sprintf("%s_%s", kind, d.Outcome),
|
|
Actor: d.Actor,
|
|
Inputs: inputs,
|
|
Reason: reason,
|
|
})
|
|
}
|