Ground the repo docs and move presence provisioning to a declared spec
Align AGENTS.md with the FT-WP- prefix the hub already registered, and rewrite INTENT.md and SCOPE.md, which were still the generated stubs and carried none of the composed-post framing the interface is built around. Fix two artifact inconsistencies: R-1's retry comment still described POST /v1/hall-entries idempotent on entry_id, from before the reframe to composed posts; and the seed pressure record listed only one of the two hypotheses that cite it. Rename it to match its id. Replace the manual T01-T03 route with FT-WP-0002. The Bot API cannot create a bot or a channel, so provisioning is an MTProto client acting as a designated operator account (Canon INT-03), driven from a declared presence spec owned by the campaign. One bounded human bootstrap remains and docs/provisioning.md says why it cannot be removed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0172sgCZEEDJcnQmr4SGDvKa Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 1361245@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: b3b428ef-f3e6-4688-b091-01f71461d66a
This commit is contained in:
parent
3dae4ae74c
commit
5a785b9d9f
11 changed files with 670 additions and 46 deletions
|
|
@ -27,8 +27,8 @@ revision:
|
|||
# failing fast would turn a rate limit into a lost entry.
|
||||
timeout_ms: 30000
|
||||
retry:
|
||||
# Only GET is retried by the connector; POST /v1/hall-entries is
|
||||
# idempotent on entry_id, but the retry decision stays with the adapter,
|
||||
# Only GET is retried by the connector. POST /v1/channel-posts is
|
||||
# idempotent on post_id, but the retry decision stays with the adapter,
|
||||
# which knows whether Telegram accepted the message.
|
||||
max_attempts: 1
|
||||
circuit_breaker:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue